" Obsessive Abbott-hater Niki Savva once admitted she was a liar. Her
latest column - yet again attacking Abbott - contains some more
astonishing distortions."Bolt Andrew Bolt the convicted liar who refuses to admit it. The daily hate monger who uses a malevolent tone to make his lies seem larger than Peter Fosters calls Nikki Savva and "obssesive hater and liar" when she confesses not to what she did as a columnist but what she did as Costello's press secretary Bolt the pimply faced schoolyard bully jumps on her and starts slinging insults. Bolt throws dirt at the media's finest for no reason other than he's a sewer rat who garners no respect whatsoever from anyone in his profession. The man goes back to 2010 cuts and pastes a Savva comment out of context taken from his "losers" file to make a point in 2017 . Anybody in the media business who didn't make it to Andrew Bolt's losers file I should imagine would be disappointed and that's a given.Unlike Bolt who spends such energy trying to save the unsaveable Abbott, Hirsi-Ali, Hanson etal from verified media facts Savva provides informed comment. All Bolt packs into his blogs and writing tends to be abuse, mockery, unverified heresay and lies. I suggest one simply look at today's offerings and read my comments and tell me I'm wrong. The only reason olddgothoughts came about Bolt moderated all comments out of his blogs simply because I disagreed with what he was doing and that is distorting the truth
ANZAC DAY TERRORIST ALERT FOR GALLIPOLI
Another terrorist alert: "The federal
government has received advice terrorists may target Anzac Day
commemorations in Gallipoli this year." But will Muslim activists will
go back to telling us what a menace Ayaan Hirsi Ali instead, with her
warnings that Islam endorses terrorism?
Will Bolt explain this sentence "But will Muslim activists will go back to telling us what a menace Ayaan
Hirsi Ali instead, with her warnings that Islam endorses terrorism?" Bolt
Muslim activists are everywhere as far as Bolt is concerned so much so he jabbers incoherently. Bolt who doesn't believe a word Julie Bishop says is quoting her here. Tomorrow he'll call her a liar. Given this why should we believe Andrew Bolt?
"absurd attempt to draw crude divisions of race between Australians, but
our Racial Discrimination Act makes dangerous a frank debate about the
new tribalism:"(No comments. The Racial Discrimination Act makes free discussion of this issue a legal minefield.)BoltA Bolt lie it's not the case He's the boy who cried wolf to many times to be believed.Yes we are meant to be all equal citizens of one nation Australia but we are a multiracial and multicultural mix and we are not all treated equally. We are not one race nor are we one culture to say we are is to allude to a reality and history that doesn't exist. To pretend to be fearful of what doesn't exist is to feign reverse racism which as far as Andrew Bolt is concerned is non existent. To pretend that he's been shut down, gagged and unable to speak is to admit he's a liar and that's why he was convicted in the first place. Lying with intent is not a strange activity for Andrew Bolt and Mordecai Bromberg told him just that. Bolt has found himself costing News Corp lawyer's fees far in excess of Mark Latham and Bolt still has his job which is a great disappointment to most Australians because they feel we a far fairer Nation than Bolt advocates we should be.If Aborigines camped on Bolt's front lawn without permission recognition or acknowledgement of his title of right Bolt would be up in arms demanding his rights be recognized. However he pays no respect recognition or acknowledgement to the first peoples of this land if their ancestors graves a dug up. In fact they are no different from Bolt but only playing at being different for money that should be fine because Bolt does the same. Free Speech allows all Australians to seek their rights doesn't it Bolt certainly seeks his doesn't he on a daily basis whinging all the time and claiming victim-hood in the process. Why is the man such a whinger when he's wealthy and has cultural capital to boot? Why is he still here if he hates the place so much? We watched the first peoples of Australia welcome Andrew Bolt to their lands on the ABC but have we ever seen Andrew Bolt welcome an Aboriginal Australian to his place? He keeps telling us he once had a bestie who was blackfella but he's never told us what he's doing today has he. He also says some of his best friends are Jews. He sounds like the bullshitter that said to the girls "I promise I'll put it in a little if it hurts I'll take it out" Judge Mordecai Bromberg knew exactly who Andrew Bolt was and still is today. Why has he posted Dan Turnbull's photo one might well ask?
TURNING HIRSI ALI INTO THE ":EXTREMIST"
Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s decision this week to pull out of her Australian tour
should shame us. The attacks on her have been so vicious that they make
clear that having a debate has become too dangerous for the safety of
us all.
Column
6 A
Who is Andrew Bolt defending?
1) Hirsi Ali 's parents said she was lying her response they were lying Bolt believes her why? Because she fits his anti- Islamic bigotry.
2) The Dutch Government said Hirsi Ali lied on her application for asylum. Bolt fails to mention it why it doesn't suit his portrayal of a heroine
3) Think Inc Have refused to comment on Ali's non appearance there seem to be commercial questions un answered which Bolt ignores but prefers exaggeration instead 5000 demonstrators.
4) In todays instant internet links Bolt cries he was to have her on his show but fear stepped 21rst Century fake news.
5) Hirsi Ali has been publicizing herself for 10 years with the help of Murdoch media. Bolt talks of threats here sponsors hav denied receiving any .
Who is bullshitting here and who has the reputation for doing just that Andrew Bolt
HOW THE BIASED ABC FRAMED HANSON
The ABC tried this week to destroy Pauline Hanson — again — in yet
another abuse of its massive power. And it didn’t only advertise its
Leftist bias in attacking a party of the Right. The ABC’s Four Corners also may have broken the law, airing a secretly taped phone call between Hanson and a One Nation senator.
The ABC report was not an editorial unlike Andrew Bolt's .
1) The electoral Commission is investigating the financial activities of One Nation. Andrew Bolt believes that should remain a secret as long as they aren't a Union.
2) Who bought the plane for $75,000. Who and for what purpose seems a reasonable question given the electoral rules and the emails revealed.
3) Why was James Ashby printing company have sole rights in a free market? Malcolm Roberts says he was the cheapest without proof typical of a Roberts statement. The printing was the printing done illegal unusable and not refundable? It's a fair question but that was biased reporting according to Bolt. Why was it fake Mr Bolt?
4) Hanson was writing what appeared to be franchise contracts wasn't that a legitimate question. It was a secret and private according to Bolt. It may have been except it was being done by a political party.
5) One Nation members of longer standing than even Pauline Hanson were kicked out of the party. According to Bolt their complaints shouldn't have been aired. They had no right to a voice.
The ABC did not print Fake News or Frame Hanson. She is under investigation and not just by the ABC
THE ONE NATION CANDIDATE THE ABC DID NOT WANT TO SHOW
Yesterday I said the ABC’s Four Corners
program had twisted the evidence to make One Nation seem it was
racist. The reporter went to a pub to find One Nation supporters and
seemed only to find people who really didn’t like foreigners. Now meet
the One Nation candidate she filmed for two days but then didn't
show. You may well guess why not.
How pathetic is Bolt he pulls an Asian Australian out of the box to show One Nation isn't Racist. It's quite simple "one sandwich doesn't make a picnic." "One Andrew Bolt doesn't make an Australian." " One kind guard on Manus doesn't make it paradise" However Andrew Bolt believes he is representative of Australians are and Mr Chang is representative of One Nation. History and context have no place in Bolt's disconnected world. It's why he sees himself as an indigenous Australian.
Just because these two men were on TV and in suits doesn't make either of them more believable. Pauline Hanson was against our immigration policies 25 years ago and she still is today her examples of what it means to be Australian may have changed but the underlying prejudice mirrored by her anti- multiculturalism hasn't. Andrew Bolt remains the same a Hanson doppelganger.
Hanson's history is best exemplified by her statements today that "Islam is a disease and is in need of vacination". It was Asians 25 years ago their impact and use as a stand out example may have passed her by. Today 35 different nationalities are now encompassed in her statement that Muslims are a disease. No Pauline they are Europeans, Australian converts, Asians people from the Middle East and elsewhere and they are all encompassed in her definition of a "disease" we proudly call Australia.
WHY THIS ANTI-WHITE RACISM?
What institutional privileges has white Australians lost none. What Institutional privileges have Indigenous Australians gained in 200 years simply look at any social indicators and you will find very few. What privileges have Muslim Australians taken from white Australians like Andrew Bolt? How many Muslims work at Sky? How many Andrew Bolt's are working in underpaid jobs? How many Andrew Bolt's are cleaners in out hospitals? When applying for a job how many does Abdul have to apply for before getting a hearing. How long does Fatima need to wait before she gets an interview. There is no reverse racism in Australia and I'm white and if I could act a racist against Andrew Bolt I would but all it would amount to is my anger and prejudice at extremely unlikable Australian a bigot and If I were black or Muslim I'd still be justified in my opinion of him without being a racist. My perjudice isn't systemic Institutional or cultural and doesn't influence Bolt in any substantial way but his attitude towards me an indigenous Australian does because he treats me as an Abo with 200 years of effect. Bolt is just another white prick who hasn't a clue.
LIBERAL HQ IN TURMOIL: TONY NUTT QUITS
Malcolm Turnbull and the Liberals have lost
their federal director, Tony Nutt, just 18 months after pushing out the
great Brian Loughnane, Tony Abbott's ally. It is sold as renewal but
looks like chaos.
I remember when Andrew Bolt kept telling us Tony Nutt was coming Tony Nutt was coming to fix Abbott's PMO and save Tony Abbott. It was like waiting for Godot Tony Nutt never came why? Bolt offered no explanation other than he was busy on the NSW state election. It seemed more like Tony Nutt saw Abbott as a lost cause and stayed away from the turmoil he had created in the party. Nutt didn't surface until Malcolm Turnbull ran for election.
There was never even an appearance of this backroom superhero to try to save Abbott & Credlin. It appears his time is over now as is the Liberal Party's because simply said. because Tony Abbott hasn't move on and his stench is ingrained. Oh Abbott put on his veil like a burka and has rocked the boat from behind the curtain as only he knows how. He is in opposition to his own party which he disregards unless it's his team. Nutt wants out to be remembered as a winner not a loser.
No comments:
Post a Comment