Andrew Bolt's Blog, 8/6/17; Mr Violence and his Mona Lisa Smirk; If George Columbaris was charged for a shove shouldn't Bolt be charged?

 

NO MORE SYMPATHY, PLEASE

TO ALL those who called me with sympathy for being attacked on Tuesday by masked protesters: stop it. Sympathy is for losers. And we must be losers no more.  

 

 Self adulation , trivializing danger what Bolt did was to try to king hit a prankster. Someone  that threw glitter at him and he's taken to center stage to distort the event. It's going to a circus folks because he's back peddling and avoiding be charged. George Colombaris was charged for pushing someone. Bolt tried knuckle the man.

Bolt remind me of the self adulating bully Biff in Back to the Future.

Andrew Bolt defied the advice of all Security experts of removing yourself from the situation in order not to provoke unnecessary violence. Bolt's true character was revealed in this moment he might hve well covered his head in the Australian Flag because he attacked like any Bogan.  The terrorists of glitter suddenly found they had to defend themselves from the attack of this aging pit-bull. Had any of his punches connected he could have killed somebody's son a glitter thrower.

 

CAN'T TRUST THE ABC TO WRITE ONE ACCURATE WORD ABOUT ME

There is a maxim in journalism: the fastest way to destroy a reader's trust is to write on a topic they actually know intimately. But I always knew the ABC, a too-powerful state broadcaster, would put whatever happened to me in the most malevolent light. Here's the latest example. God spare me from the ABC's spite should I one day truly err.

  George Colombaris was charged for reacting shoving the man in the chest at a football match. Andrew Bolt wants to play self adulating hero  and he attempted to king hit, one punch a person who glittered him. He knows he did the wrong thing he's using his platform to avoid what happened to George. However if George was charged shouldn't Bolt be instead of providing himself with his own media stage to bow on?

Biff Tannen Back to the Future Conservative

WHY I PUNCHED AND WHY I DON'T WANT YOUR SYMPATHY

Apologies for making a deal about punching a protester. But there is a reason for me doing this. We must intimidate and humiliate the enemies of free speech, and not let them intimidate and humiliate us. My editorial from The Bolt Report:

Prankster protesters tag Andrew Bolt and he tried to king hit them The truth of the matter is that Bolt was the most violent person at that scene. Punching kicking and yet trying to claim victim-hood after the event. Naming calling kids Fascist Left flipping the whole meaning of the term Fascist. 
Bolt gloated yesterday making out he gave as good as he got. The man got glittered he was neither punched nor kicked. It seems he had a camera man present for his grand entry into a restaurant book launch  in Carlton. The camera man didn't seem too concerned for Bolt's safety from the video and  nobody was  outside to meet or greet Bolt. By the looks of it a few stragglers a woman wanting a selfie and an unmasked young man taking a snap with his phone. Poor bastard was accused by Bolt for being part of the gang. How dumb is Bolt?
Bolt has now gone from "Oh don't call me victim" and we haven't  to turning it into a "celebrity event" an auctioning of a suit for Charity. How very paparazzi of him given that he in fact is the one  who could be sued for getting physical and trying to one punch a kid. We know how many people have been killed recently in those circumstances. Nobody threw anything but glitter at Bolt
Lest we forget  charges were brought against Mick Gatto for murder  in Carlton. He cried victim too and had to prove it in court. He may have won but if Bolt had to prove his case of assault  in court  his video evidence raises more questions than his claim of innocence.
Bolt had the gall to blame some unmasked passer by with a phone as a co-conspirator of a gang when his camera man seemingly  un-phased kept filming was he a conspirator too?. More than likely it seemed a publicity stunt to me ,concocted before or after the event I don't know but look at the picture with the suit and the Barnum and Bailey announcement of an auction and it  convinces me it was  even more. I won't help advertise this circus. I believe Bolt should be charged for attempting to king hit a kid a prankster maybe  but that's all. Alan Joyce didn't get violent.

 

NO MORE SYMPATHY, PLEASE. UPDATE: PHOTOGRAPHER CLAIMS INNOCENCE IN BRAWL

To all those who called me with sympathy for being attacked on Tuesday by masked protesters: stop it. Sympathy is for losers. And we must be losers no more. UPDATE: The photographer who was with the attackers claims he wasn't part of the ambush. I have trouble believing him, given how little  my attendance was publicised.  Watch his film here.  

  "The photographer who was with the attackers claims he wasn't part of the ambush. I have trouble believing him, given how little my attendance was publicised."

Bolt is continuing to blame the bystander who turns out to be a professional photographer.  However no word from the woman or even his camera man. The stroy as we know it so far is just a one-way street called Bolt. The photographer  ran away of course he did when Bolt the bull visciously charged tried to king hit the kid and kicked him in the balls. I'd have got out of there quick smart too.

What we see is Bolt who knows there were more victims there than he'd like to mention. Bolt calling now for high fives is calling for the UPF, Reclaim or any other f'wits to do the same. I hope the police actually take a closer look at who was the most violent under the circumstances.

For heavens sake how out of control is Bolt  at home when he loses it?

 

ANTIFA CLAIMS MY ATTACKERS WERE IT'S "FAMILY"

The violent Antifa group has claimed  indirect responsibility for the attack on me. It confirms it is what it condemns - fascist,  hate-speaking and even the victim: "Some of our family in solidarity were attacked by Andrew Bolt while they were protesting today. Why he isn't in prison for his horrendous, violent language yet is beyond me."

  "I can't believe he was not tipped off. I have never seen him at any other event I have attended. How convenient that he turned up for this one."Bolt
Bolt seems really concerned that if he gets too much attention he just might be charged the denies the words of an Australian professional photographer but not the words of ISIS who claim anything and everything as their own with Bolt's support. Bolt who usually rejects anything that ANTIFA says has jumped the fence and supports them too why because by saying they supported the protesters Bolt then can say they are one and the same. The fact however is that's a total deflection of what occurred. Bolt was violated with glitter the protesters were violated with fists and boots that's a big difference. Remember Bolt has a history being loose with the facts. It makes me believe the man is clutching at straws  celebrating himself  and justifying it just in case.

 

AND STILL THEY WON'T SHUT THE GATE

Three weeks ago ASIO boss Duncan Lewis told a Senate committee on oath: “I have absolutely no evidence to suggest there is a connection between refugees and terrorism.” But last Sunday, Somali-born Yacqub Khayre became the latest refugee terrorist to prove him wrong.  Yet still our politicians won't shut the gate.

  " “I have absolutely no evidence to suggest there is a connection between refugees and terrorism.”  Duncan Lewis

The head of Tony Abbott's newly supported financed and strengthened  ASIO  made that statement to the Senate committee and he's been publicly supported by the AFP, and Peter Dutton. The statement is the result of intelligence gathering Australia wide. Andrew Bolt with his little list of variously but specifically defined cases cases selected by him as acts of terrorism claims Duncan Lewis is Australia's James Comey .

Selected cases all 6 are Bolt's proof a recent example being Khayre The police were "treating" it as a terrorist event. Bolt says it was because ISIS claimed it. He's been ISIS's greatest supporter in Australia providing the attention they want

 Khayre was an Australian citizen whose been here for 24 years since he was 7 in fact . Bolt  sets citizenship  aside in defining who is or isn't Australian. Bolt basically says he was a refugee an asylum seeker and a Muslim and that's what defined him. However Curtis Cheng a victim was Australian. What I'm getting at Bolt swaps and changes his definitions in order to arrive at his preordained conclusions. The only thing in common it seems with Bolt's case studies is ISIS claims them and Bolt who is the first to agree.

ISIS are Sunni radicals Man Monis was a Shia with 43 sex charges against him along with an accessory to murder charge out on bail with a severe psychiatric condition. None of Bolts terrorists could have spent a day together let alone had a common cause mad bad and ugly applies to Multicultural Australia Multiculturalism isn't the cause of bad behavior being a refugee isn't the cause of terrorism Islam isn't either Bolt just has the cart before the horse and Duncan Lewis is stating the fact that ASIO research and statistics out weigh anything Bolt has to say in promoting stupidity

 By the way was Khayre for ISIS or Al Qaeda? They are enemies and he didn't seem to know the difference. It seems he was as much a radicalized terrorist as Bolt is an informed commentator.

 

ISLAMIC COUNCIL WANTS SAFE SPACE FOR HATE SPEECH. AND WE MUST PAY

The Islamic Council of Victoria, which runs the state's deradicalisation program, has lost the plot : "Muslim young people are feeling more emotionally overloaded. A safe space is needed for them to meet and talk about a range of issues in emotional terms, where they can be frank and even use words which in a public space would sound inflammatory."

  Bolt obviously knows the meaning of "hate speech" he usually calls it restricted "free speech" Bolt is "flipping" he hates to see Muslims agree with him or fight for a platform of any kind let alone an equal one. 

Wasn't his self adulation about trying to king hit a kid   justified by Bolt's right to enter a safe space for the purpose of giving a speech?  He calls it "His Battle for Free Speech".Aside from the fact that's BS and it had nothing to do with that.  Bolt wasn't talking he was simply too busy assaulting a protestor who glittered him he never even bothered to stop and  ask why? 

By the way his suit could have been cleaned. No principle just the side. If Bolt isn't charged can George Colombaris plead the Bolt defense?