Friday, 9 November 2018

Andrew Bolt's Blog,9/11/18; Bolt the hypercritical Galahad; You have to laugh; From one day to the next Bolt stirs mud to dumbdown the Conservatives;








Image result for illustrations of women pilloried

43m
As usual, Bolt fails to look in the mirror when he conflates two cases presenting them as if they were the same. Generally, he prefers to argue that the "me too" movement is just a bunch of frightbats victimising men. However here he is pretending to be Galahad their defender at the hands of what"some other men do do". We can actually add Bolt to his characterization of ugly men who simply call women liars when called out? Yes, didn't Bolt tell us he was once the " A minder to a belly dancer"?  When that dancer said she was really his fiance he denied it saying it wasn't true, that she was a liar? It didn't go to court because when Bolt was threatened he folded like a cheap suit admitting he was a cad lying about her and to his wife.
 Bolt's problem conflating the Rush and Foley cases is they are significantly different. Rush isn't suing Norvill he's suing News Corp's The Daily Telegraph his employer. A mega-Corporation has forced Norvill into court to defend itself and in doing so has made her the meat in the sandwich. Rush is only doing what he's entitled and that's to defend himself and do it vigorously. Norvill was subpoenaed by Murdoch Media to be pilloried and she was prepared by their lawyers for their defence. Murdoch media are hiding behind the woman's skirts. Who, given their track record aren't innocents when it comes to being sued for questionable tabloid sensationalism. Their headline alone King Leer shows what they are capable of when it comes to selling papers. The judge has pointed out that in the context of theatre history and actors there is valid room for ambiguity which the Telegraph took advantage of and Bolt seems to suggest is biased.
Foley's case, on the other hand, is really about the misuse and abuse of Parliamentary Privilege and the underhanded immoral tactic intentionally used by a Liberal Party MP David Elliot. The complete abuse of a woman's privacy. The Liberals are the masters of dirty politics modelled on Abbott and today Trump and supported by none other than the media again. Nobody has been sued yet because it's complicated but an institution and a woman have been tarnished by a party without scruples and Bolt is deflecting attention away from that.
What is common to both here and what Bolt ignores is that 2 women have been commodified treated as bait by less than moral organizations for their profit alone and not in the service of anyone else. One for the Daily Telegraph's benefit, not such a reputable paper and the other by the Liberal Party also currently low on any reputational ladder. Both have treated and used the women objects for their personal gain and gratification, penetrated their privacy in a  form symbolic of social rape if you like to think about it. Something Bolt totally ignores. He's no hero or SNAG as he did much the same to his ex-fiance treating her as an object for his own personal aggrandisement. Nevermind that he ran into a brick wall he was forced to publicly apologise rather than be taken to court. 
The moral of these 2 stories that Bolt overlooks in his editorial is that Rush and Norvill are both victims of  Institutional Political and Corporate greed and ambition. Foley and the female Journalist are both victims of the moral and ethical misuse of Institutional standards. Parliamentary privilege in one and Media the other. The outcomes for the individuals involved here are dire and not just for both men and women and trivial for the MP and Journalist. 'Reckless, cruel irresponsibility': Rush barrister slams Telegraph

 

 Putin Admits He Forgot To Vote In Midterms – The Shovel

  Image result for Image of stirring mud


8m
Polling showed that the coalition hadn't been in a better position before Turnbull was ousted. However Conservative media on 2GB and Sky News kept saying he was out of touch and lost their supporters to One Nation. Bolt was adamant only Abbott could win them back yet yesterday he claimed One Nation had taken the ALP base and that's why Mark Latham was a good fit for Pauline Hanson. How many voters does Bolt think One Nation commands? The man is talking BS. Bolt really does speak through his butt hole, doesn't he? Even Mattias Corman agreed that the Liberal Party were on the up and were back in the race. "has conceded the Coalition had improved its electoral position just before his colleagues knifed their leader. The Age According to Bolt he never said this.

"Senator Cormann said he had not seen internal party polling showing the Coalition ahead 52 to 48 in key marginal seats - polling Mr Turnbull revealed in his appearance on the ABC's Q&A program on Thursday night." Bolt quoting Murdoch Media

Tell me that this doesn't show why conservatives are out of touch with reality for simply tuning into this sort of media and daily listening to Andrew Bolt whose effort is to blind them from what is really going on. 
The ALP sits back says nothing because they certainly aren't in the business of popping the neocon's fantasy bubble. If Corman is supposed not to have seen any internal polling how is it he declared to Fairfax that he had. That Party polls showed they were doing so well. "Finally" Bolt begins when all he's doing is stirring mud his intention to disguise any truth with a mountain of crap. 

 

CAR EXPLODES IN MELBOURNE, KNIFEMAN ATTACKS

Victorian police were brave in tackling a knife-wielding man who stabbed two people after his car exploded in Melbourne's Bourke St today.  Should police be quicker to shoot to save themselves? The man's complexion and head covering suggests something too familiar.

4mLink

"A relative of the man was arrested on terror-related charges last year. However, sources said there had been no intelligence from counter-terror authorities about any serious threat. " Police
Matthew Guy's response "enough is enough" in a city of 4 mill sounds like he will use this single event to politcize something that in fact is not out of control but whipping up fear is Abbottesque politics and Murdoch media will be there to assist.

Last week Andrew Bolt tried his best to warn us of the Left's violence in the USA totally ignoring the facts that the recent spate of shootings and mass murders tended to be committed by white men who were Trumpsters. Melbourne has been quiet in recent times so Bolt seems to have the need to make things up to prove his fake narratives. He's back in business and suddenly has something to draw our attention to "The man's complexion and head covering suggests something too familiar."Bolt. What head covering Andrew Bolt? 
 All this is to continue his fake media driven stereotyping generalisations about specific Australian minorities. Andrew Bolt not only has a personal dislike for what he regards as unsuitable Australians but a systemic racist aloofness he was taught as a child and seems normal to him. Bolt believes in a hierarchy shown it against the Sudanese Lebanese and other Australian communities he regards as underclass.
He totally ignores the statistics that reveal he's wrong. He ignores or declares a conspiracy when police deny his accusations and he ignores the statistics that clearly show he's wrong. But that is of no concern to Bolt when an election is coming this month and the Liberals are so far behind. Lying means nothing to Bolt when politics are involved. He willingly is prepared to destroy each and every institution the Australian public believes in. He simply does what every Nazi propagandist did in the 30s while wearing fine suits appreciating the opera, art, fine wine and food. Dorian Gray lives in real life and his name is Andrew Bolt. 12 people were shot in a Californian Bar yesterday something too familiar that being Bolt who totally ignored it because the shooter didn't fit his desired profile.







38m





What can be assured of is wherever Andrew Bolt declares something is False it's in fact true. For example, Matthew Corman was quoted in saying he agreed with Turnbull that the Liberal Party's internal polling was extremely good prior to Turnbull's ousting. They were back in the race. According to Bolt " As for that alleged internal polling, Mathias Cormann, the Government's leader in the Senate, says he never saw it." significantly different from what was reported in the Age. Who do you believe has the most trustworthy reporting record and who has the most twisted? 
 I might add Chris Kenny is Bolt's Tweedle-dee to Bolt's dumb two grieved observers that they will never have the opportunity to do for Australians what the ABC has.
Let it be said Turnbull isn't more than a citizen today with little influence. That's significantly different from Tony Abbott who was warned by his peers to change. He promised he would but failed and was voted out only to go to the backbench and really set out to destroy the Party which he continues to do today at every opportunity.
As for his brilliant ideas, he fucked the NBN, put his hands in his pocket when it came to infrastructure, Spent money on another war which we are losing, and passed the least number of Bills since John Gorton who never wanted to be PM in the first place. As long as Tony Abbott remains in the Liberal Party the Party will remain dead in the water to Australians.
3h9
Bolt also identified himself as a minder to a belly dancer and boy wasn't he put back in his box?

No comments: