Bushfire disaster blame falls on coal companies
Our government's insistence on using coal as an energy source can be directly linked to the catastrophic bushfire situation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3dcee/3dceebe397bcc50f72d1c5baaa3a196f2713dd2b" alt=""
Worker takes a few days off to help dad save home from bushfires, then gets the sack
-
With catastrophic conditions looming and a friend already having lost his house, Beau Carroll sent work a text saying he needed to defend the family home. After three days battling blazes, he found out he was fired.
Newcastle Council said it "rejects Mr Carroll's suggestion that his short-term contract ended due to him fighting fires."
Newcastle Council is run by idiots it appears who have little or no consideration or care for what was occurring at the time were they on fire? They were certainly in a rush it would appear. (ODT)
Storm brewing over cyclone insurance proposal
Insurance companies are pressing for stronger action on climate change to deal with soaring premiums for Australians exposed to natural disasters.
In the meantime deniers and media spruikers from the Murdoch stable are telling Australia there are "fewer cyclones" doing less damage and harm than ever before. While the government denying emissions are part of the problem wants the whole country to pay for the resultant damage as if it were normal rather than exceptional and subsidize these weather extremes. Rather than do anything about climate change. (ODT)
FAKE AND TWISTED NEWS
CATASTROPHIC! IS THIS NEW ALARMIST LANGUAGE HEALTHY?
Another day of warnings of "catastrophic" fire conditions, this time in South Australia. No one dead, thank God, and property losses limited. The damage is bad, but this language of catastrophe seems deliberately alarmist and can't be healthy. But it lets Leftist media overseas use these fires to keep up the warming scare. From The Bolt Report.
No comments:
Post a Comment