Exclusive
Climate policy
Voters want Australia to set a net zero 2050 emissions target, but no carbon tax
A majority of Australians want the federal government to cut greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2050 but do not want a carbon price as part of the plan.
The question asked "do you support a new tax or new technologies" hardly represents a true indication of what Australians really do support. "do you support the most effective way to achieve net zero" or" should the largest carbon emitters pay a price for their emissions" might have derived different responses. This has been a hardly unbiased poll was it first tested out on a focus group in order get the response wanted?
The question itself is no longer a valid sovereign one and is really one that needs a combined global focus such as a the recent global tax on corporations. A tax on the single largest carbon emitters per person or the largest companies might be more effective. The Dutch lead the way with it's recent demands on Shell. Currently Australia stands in opposition to the G7.
Is it any wonder Biden cancelled his and Morrison's one on one scheduled meeting? Morrison in the eyes of Americans is more a Trumper Republican than a Biden Democrat and his links with QAnon. That and his policies on climate change certainly certainly wouldn't endear him to Biden.
All these Labs aren’t in China. Just how many secrets does this
government refuse to reveal? Timor Leste is just one that comes to mind.
Morrison is hardly promoting an in-principle argument here that he
abides by.
Scott Morrison’s support for President Biden’s assertion that there is an urgent need to bolster and accelerate efforts to identify the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic and further that there is a need to ensure that the World Health Organization is independent and invested with stronger surveillance powers, seems on the face of it more than reasonable. Is it?
But nonetheless, the lab scenario should worry us. Governments around the world operate labs that create and study viruses. One could claim that this is a disinterested pursuit of scientific knowledge but somehow, I doubt that funding such research is motivated by lofty altruistic motives. The laboratories working on various biohazardous research are graded from 1-4 according to their potential risk. Fifty or so laboratories worldwide come into category 4. Category 4 laboratories are highly regulated and often top-secret establishments. One cannot help but infer from that level of secrecy that governments fund that research out of their defense budgets.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86dcb/86dcbc596011784215af2f5d7e5e3133e996ac7b" alt="3 Qs"
Source: COVID-19 origin: a search or a witch hunt? – » The Australian Independent Media Network
NBN problems a result of Coalition Government's cost-cutting policies
Moving away from the debate about what is or isn’t “critical race theory” and instead focusing on what lawmakers are actually trying to do — replace factual information with fake history — helps recenter the debate on what’s really going on. After all, the only reason Republicans and right-wing pundits lie about what is and isn’t in the public school curriculum is because they know they can’t win the debate by being honest. The truth terrifies them, which is why they go to such lengths to conceal it both in public debate and in our public schools.
Why isBruce Pascoe an Andrew Bolt pathological obsession?
Source: Why the panic over “critical race theory” is the perfect right-wing troll | Salon.com
The Israeli military confirmed it attacked the Gaza Strip on Tuesday, marking the definitive end of a cease-fire that followed 11 days of violence last month in which over 250 people were killed, most of them Palestinians. In a statement, the Israel Defense Forces said it had attacked Hamas’ armed compounds in Gaza City in response to the reported launching of incendiary balloons from the territory, which the Israeli fire brigade said caused 20 fires in open fields near the Gaza border but apparently no casualties. HuffPost has not been able to confirm whether Hamas militants were responsible for the balloons. Advertisement The IDF said it was “ready for all scenarios, including renewed fighting in the face of continued terrorist attacks emanating from Gaza.”
Balloons and some fires in paddocks vs a reign of bombing and terror from the skies
No comments:
Post a Comment