Fighting Fake News with REAL, 17/9/23, No hint of Humanity, Institutionalised Racism, The colorless No, Andrew Bolt and Racial Vilification,

 

 

 Information provided by spoke persons they have elected not by speakers 

 like  Jacinta Price and Warren Mundine who they they haven't. Why are these

 non elected Indigenous individuals less than 1% given more  media time than

 any that do represent the majority of Indigenous Australians?

 

The fullest acknowledgment of humanity is to say, I see you and I hear you.

Contrary to the constant refrain of the No campaign, this referendum has not divided us. We were already divided. What it has done is exaggerate gaps and fissures that already existed.

If we vote No on October 14, it will not suddenly reveal Australia as a deeply racist nation – all it will do is prove it.

Source: Voiceless – The Shot

Listening is a radical change never guaranteed by governments for 240 years. It’s Time

Institutionalized racism has sabotaged respectful listening to First Nations perspectives.

. Racism is one of the factors that explains a measurable gap between outcomes for Indigenous Australians and the rest of the population.

 

Talking about racism is a trap. When Indigenous leaders and other people of colour express frustration about its dogged persistence, they are often subjected to tone policing. They can be caricatured as angry, ungrateful, shrill. And gratuitous characterisations – the pernicious stereotypes of the angry black man or the irrational black woman – are another form of silencing.

 

Ask Adam Goodes, Stan Grant,

Source:  The Guardian

 

 99% Whites here have united to stand 100% behind 0.00001%  Jacinta and Warren and deny 800,000 Indigenous Australians a Voice

 The World is Watching…. A No vote will mean that Australians don’t want to recognise the oldest continuous cultural connection to a country in the world in their Constitution and that Australians don’t want to hear what they have to say on matters which concern their people. (Tony Windsor)

Listening is a radical change that’s never been guaranteed by governments for 240 years. It’s Time to say Yes. Because isn't saying No Racial Vilification under the Act?

• Institutionalized racism has sabotaged respectful listening to First Nations perspectives.

• . Racism is one of the factors that explains a measurable gap between outcomes for Indigenous Australians and the rest of the population.

• Talking about racism is a trap. When Indigenous leaders and other people of colour express frustration about its dogged persistence, they are often subjected to tone policing. They can be caricatured as angry, ungrateful, shrill. And gratuitous characterizations – the pernicious stereotypes of the angry black man or the irrational black woman – are another form of silencing.

 Some White Australians are determined to use Indigenous Australians as a Political Football and it’s not those that vote Yes. Stan Grant, Adam Goodes, are examples of those who have faced off against the power of institutionalized racism.

Murdoch Media’s Andrew Bolt. Bolt was declared guilty under the Racial Vilification Act when he defamed Marcia Langton and 4 others as being Fake Aborigines and then in his defense claimed his right of “free speech”. As if there was an equivalence between right and wrong. Judge Mordecai Bromberg decided otherwise and Murdoch Media’s legal team didn’t appeal and their silence was an acknowledgement of Bolt’s guilt and not a case of “reverse racism”

Source:  The Guardian