Andrew Bolt's blog, 14/5/16; Bolt's political stance Nope! Nope! Nope! !, The Rolling Stones had Sympathy for the Devil I don't!!; Bolt says his Sky News got it wrong and Shorten won;

 

Posturing then - or now? Another Labor candidate confronted

In Bolt's world any politician changing ones vote is deemed traitorous. The 54 Liberal politicians will suffer the curse of Abbott and according to Bolt should be given the John Stone revenge vote. Any labor Politician should be treated equivalently. That's Bolt's heavy handed warning to not only politicians but all Australians seen to adopt a change of mind. Labor's Peta Murphy is about to be handed the Bolt belt for adopting the ALP policy on Security today and not having beliefs she once held in 2009. Remember when Tony Abbott voted against the Malaysia Solution. He then changed his mind. He did that on quite a few issues in a much shorter period of time and was labeled a liar. Bolt seems to hold different standards for him.

Bolt claims to work 70 hours a week and somehow demands  our respect for the standard of work he achieves the quality of which we can find below has to be sub-standard doesn't it?

"It is all very well for Murphy to belatedly claim the terrorism threat is clear, but her ground stood in the way of those who say the threat long before she did and tried to make us safe - only to be mocked and demonised by the left for trying."

All the evidence listed by Bolt happens to have occurred after the 2009 Liberty Victoria Submission and makes out as if the document was written in concrete and inflexible listing of organizations such as the PKK as a terrorist organization when they were regarded as allies in our fight against ISIS reeks of hypocrisy. As does his argument that all Australians need to be treated equally under our laws. Bolt continually maintains that all Australians are equal under our constitution and laws. However Bolt has a private list of exceptions. That would allow for anyone to be detained at the governments pleasure, not charged or even informed of the reasons why. They would have no access to a lawyer or even be able to contact relatives. It's strangely similar to what occurs in all facist regimes where people are simply disappeared.

  Bolt also disagrees with the premise that having served your time for any crime  or held in such detention it should never be forgotten or expunged from the record. Welcome to the world of General Pinochet. Bolt's underlying values are the same.

Bolt knows why New York trip ends in mystery deportation for Melbourne artist Hamishi Farah  Nope Nope Nope piss off or we will detain you reasons unnecessary.

 

 

 

 

 

On last night’s debate: Shorten needs more mongrel, Turnbull needs more heart

 

  Why is Bolt always so  dour glum not a positive word to say. He even tells viewers they missed nothing by not watching Sky News Channel on Friday night he simply bags everyone but himself.  Bolt says Turnbull was "bad" which  if compared with Tony Abbott is an outright compliment. Even when seeming to criticize Shorten  Bolt  runs off at the mouth on a tangent  spewing his venom on Turnbull. Is there any wonder he has a viewing audience 85% smaller on pay TV. Miranda Devine was right in questioning his sanity.

"Here is what Shorten got wrong: He went low key, when Turnbull’s weakness is his massive pride and impatience. More scorn and attack is necessary. " Bolt

 "Here is what the debate got wrong:"Bolt

Sky News  got it wrong and were slammed. David Speers got it wrong he wasn't a moderator.  Nobody directed the questions or answers in order to influence the outcome, as Bolt does therefore the whole night was a failure. In short Bolt's plea is to tell whoever is reading his blog Don't watch Sky News in future.

Bolt almost sounds sorry Labor hasn't forged ahead  this morning, but hey they are winning in Victoria thanks to Tony Abbott's attempted blackmail  in 2013. Bolt called holding back $3bill forceful leadership Andrews called it thanks!!

Even The Australian's Paul Kelly isn't as astute as our man Bolt is and is told he got it wrong wrong. Turnbull was as slippery as an eel. Shorten had it over him. You see the Western Suburb audience voted Shorten won 42 to 29 and Bolt seemed to write defending their conclusion. Because he sure as hell wouldn't cross the road to piss on Turnbull if he was on fire. Source: Shorten wins first debate

The Subtext & Conclusion given Bolt's summary:  Don't bother to watch SKY NEWS ever again and Vote Labor.

How much of this blog was actually compiled by Andrew Bolt the man who says he works 70 hours a week  10minutes? It was put together by his Troll Peter BH.

 

Bolt complained about Amanda Meade of the Guardian bagging his Bolt Report on Sky News as a flop Bolt called her a liar. Guess Ebony Bowden  of SMH is a liar too  when she actually put out his new rating figures Andrew Bolt's The Bolt Report finds little love on Sky, averages 23,000 ...

Yes, of course I am starting small. But, damn, this is great - and growing 

 

Yes Bolt's right Sky News did get something wrong didn't they employed him. But then they weren't  given an option. Without Hancock and Murdoch on the board of Ch10 even as a production freebie News Corp didn't want to pay for the time slot any longer. So Bolt's Report was hand-balled to Sky for an instant 85% ratings drop.

Bolt's attitude is not new it's been around a long time.

Rolling Stones : Sympathy for the Devil 

 Please allow me to introduce myself
I'm a man of wealth and taste
I've been around for a long, long year
Stole many a man's soul and faith
And I was 'round when Jesus Christ
Had his moment of doubt and pain
Made damn sure that Pilate
Washed his hands and sealed his fate
Pleased to meet you
Hope you guess my name
But what's puzzling you
Is the nature of my game

 https://soundcloud.com/discografika-emanu-el/sympathy-for-the-devil-by-the

I might have sympathy for the devil but I've none for Andrew Bolt

Andrew Bolt's Blog 24/2/15; Hate for Abbottt and the ratings on NS do improve; The Liberal Party's internal war shush; Widodo vs Abbott; Marcia; Call Them Out, forget the truth, be like me, coaching from Bolt's Bleachers; 47:53

 

 

 

Mark Scott shows his ABC how to mock Liberals

Mark Scott once Liberal adviser now CEO of the ABC who was highly recommended by Mr Newman a current Liberal adviser  for his job has drawn the ire of Andrew Bolt yet a distant but wannabe Liberal adviser . These Liberal supporters just can't get it together can they inside or outside of the party. Bolt's complaint wont be heard as he has a habit of crying Wolf whenever he has the chance. He just has to be seen doing Murdoch's will. Sling mud at the ABC the most trusted Australian media outlet.

 

Triggs evidence:  inquiry called in part to get around Sovereign Borders. UPDATE: Brandis blasts

The best Bolt's UPDATE provides is a declaration that Prof Triggs is lying evidence none other than Brandis's Department Secretary Chris Moriatis backed by Brandis himself. Given the nature of the lie the promise of  the  offer of another government job if  she resigned seems like a bribe.

 Brandis doesn't deny the offer of a job to Triggs but not the condition of resignation. Sorry it makes no sense. Doesn't a job offer imply a resignation from the status quo? Or was the job offer because of a job thought well done to be taken up after her current term ended? Brandis and his messenger Moriatis seem to have been caught out given  Craig Laundy back bencher  raised concerns about his Government's treatment of  Triggs. Mr Laundy told colleagues he was just echoing the concerns of people in his electorate. This is something Bolt's narrative has omitted. I guess the best question to ask who stood to gain by Professor Trigg's resignation?

George Brandis wants Gillian Triggs to resign as Human Rights Commission president - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation).

 

Triggs admits: her inquiry called in part to get around Sovereign Borders

Here is the lack of due care 190 kids in detention and in pain NOW!!

UPDATE

Brandis admits to asking Triggs to resign but Moriatis says he didn't use the word. The two are on the same team but cant agree.

 

 Fact check: Triggs correct on the length of time children spent in detention - Fact Check - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation).

 Forget them let's talk about last year or whenever but forget what's going down Now!! Because "what you want me to talk about is embarassing me." Is that a natural human response from someone who claims to give a damn whose human? Or is it the the deranged response of an egocentric after some reward and now on the back foot because of his foot in mouth disease? You won the argument about the boats moron  look at the polls.

 Triggs didn’t formally decided hold an enquiry until December 2013. Why? Because the elections were on. Had she held it before Andrew and Tony would have complained. So it was held after the elections Andrew and Tony complain. A fuck up they now wished they hadn't.

They believed it embarrassed Tony. Well it does now because ever body has jumped in to support Triggs even the United Nations not just Labour and the Greens. To shut up and release the remaining children was just too difficult for this lot of Simon Lagrees. ( Uncle Tom's Cabin)George Brandis wants Gillian Triggs to resign as Human Rights Commission president - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation).

 

 

MPs for hire

Pollie's with their noses in the trough.

 Doesn't Cory Bernardi have some questions to address at the moment about his time as a financial adviser and the online ads that were still running when he was minister. How is it the AFP only investigated Peter Slipper and not all the other rats that were allowed to throw money back? Isn't Ashby being investigated for perjury?

 

Mark Colvin reads between my lines to find my sinister silence

I only see one specific mention of Lyons here no multiples and if I remember correctly your Murdoch pal was hoodwinked by Liberal leakers. I guess it's a sort of slap and apology at the same time No outrage however of the sort Bolt dishes to non Murdoch men or even academics who are entitled personal opinion. However according to Bolt if they have one he doesn't favour not allowed go near students. 

 

The danger Labor refuses to see - or help avert

The problem has been Hockey and Abbott only attending to one side of the ledger spending. It was neither holistic nor easy to sell because it hit everybody as unfair. Their insistence and intransigence compound it. 

 https://wordpress.com/post/71622728/5184

They continue to reject any systemic fault in the finance industry that has carried on wholesale theft of peoples super funds far far outweighing blue collar crime. Corman says "forget it".

 NAB leaks: Senator’s push for white collar royal commission gains steam.

 

Spare me the outrage

" I’ve often heard Western leaders describe Islam as a ‘religion of peace’. I wish more Muslim leaders would say that more often, and mean it."

 Tony Abbott Wishes More Muslim Leaders Would Distance Themselves From Terrorism Like They “Mean It” | Junkee.

If you have a tin ear you just don't hear anything. Muslims have been saying on a daily basis around this country and the world that terror is not Islam. Daesh is not Islam and they throw their bodies on the front line to prove it. 

They don't get on 2GB to say it. Murdoch Press certainly doesn't report it.These media in fact run Abbott's  divisive line. "Why aren't Muslim leaders saying it more often"  They rattle on and publicise the entirely non representative Muslim line of terrorists. If these media mention Islam as a religion of peace at all it tends to be in fine print one line buried in the abuse. Read yesterday's column by Andrew Bolt. He rails on about the Grand Mufti support of vile terror groups and his disloyalty to this country find the  one line, the legal get out line to show  him not being a vilifier and an advocate of terror. It's there but like Wally see if you can find it.

"Yes, 40 Muslim groups and leaders denounced once of the worst terrorist attacks on our soil."

Read this blog you'll see the get out line and then take note of the rest of the blog. It's Mud Slinging at Muslims. Murdoch has 1.5 million readers that listen to this vilification and false outrage for little more than political point scoring. It's what Bolt says all Liberal MPs worth their metal should do. "Call them out" truth aside whisper the majority moderate line  but yell the heretic terrorist line.  Make sure you call it Islam even if their leaders don't. Spare me the outrage indeed. Waleed Aly makes Andrew Bolt look and sound mentally challenged which more often than not is the case.

What Muslims think in the war zone Iraq about ISIS  might just be revealing.

 

The Atlantic’s big Islam lie: What Muslims really believe about ISIS – Salon.com. 

 

 

Is this trash the best the media has to drag down Abbott? Is this really worthy of the profession?

 Talking of trash has anybody read Bolt's blog above this one?

Where there's smoke there's fire and unless all journalists are like News Corp and Bolt we the public will try to garner some sense from the rest. Bolt has the habit of calling 97% of the profession heretics including the APC the profession's representative body. Of the remaining 3% Bolt is one of the few brought before the courts and called out for his unprofessional conduct more than once. That alone says something about the man. On the advice of his Lawyers he's apologised quite a few times as well unreported.

Now he's crying foul and declaring Abbott a victim the very thing that upsets him when Muslims without media backing feel hard done by. In one breathe Bolt uses this as an argument against Muslims but in the same breath one for Abbott.Why didn't Abbott call out the truth that Muslims don't get the publicity they deserve for their support? It doesn't suit his politics.

"What does it say about Abbott’s Liberal leakers that false claims are peddled to bring him down? What does it say about many in the media that they are so gratefully received, believed and peddled? "

What does it say about the fact that a man thinks he stands alone in a profession he calls shysters. He is alone in a profession in which so many have won accolades and awards for their work. This sole figure stands up to degrade an destroy them like an extermist. He does have a Baghdaddi quality about him.

In the meantime there is a real war erupting in the administration of the Liberal Party demanding the resignation of the president Peta Credlin's husband Brian. It's about the blocking  and restricted communication within the party. Bolt certainly is not the man to make mention of it is he.

 Prime Minister Tony Abbott defends Peta Credlin after letters from Philip Higginson expose split in Liberal Party executive - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation).

 

Indonesian President tells anti-Abbott journalists not to “heat this up”

It's a pity that as a professional journalist Bolt doesn't doesn't hit spell check. It's as important as politicians "calling them out"

Anyway Widodo it seems has more diplomatic skills than Tony Abbott no matter what the circumstance. The press on the other hand do what the press do. If  true to their craft reporters look for the the truth with a critical eye. If they are just commentators working for the private press  like Bolt they operate in the best interests of their publishers or in his case corporate owners. If working for the ABC one would report Widodo's request coupled with the fact of what Abbott said in the circumstance. In addition that some conservative press were reporting it as just another "beat up"trying brush Abbott's lack of tact under the carpet.

 

Marcia was no category 5 cyclone, and was no warning of warming doom

We all haven't any doubt the reporters get things wrong we know they do. Commentators are even worse as some  have a vested interest  in what they do and say. Take Andrew Bolt's choice of words commenting on a singular event.

 "The global warming mania has turned many believers into catastrophists. Winds suddenly become hurricanes. Hot days are sold as as furnaces.Take Cyclone Marcia. The warmist New Scientist, aided by the Bureau of Meteorology, spruiked an epoch-defining catastrophe - a terrifying harbinger of global warming doom:" 

What is Bolt doing here initially he is commenting on  reporting and not on any scientific statement or the science.

 He tries to be authoritative by dragging a descriptive paragraph out of context about what has been a historical belief  to date. What he omits is latest predictions given the data & scientific research. That  in future things will get worse. It's what the paper Bolt is quoting from actually says. Is there any reason for this purposeful omitting? 

Then Bolt swings back to  Marcia and the reporting of it which has little or nothing to do with any research.We have Bolt arguing that the  history and reporting of weather events is all over the shop. The reporting of singular events or even the reporting of research is not and has nothing to do with the research and the work of climate science itself. Bolt is simply stating the obvious. That people like himself can't be trusted. 

 NY Times On Climate Denier #Fakexpert Willie Soon | Crooks and Liars. A Fox News Expert.

The closest thing to truth we have lies with the 97% of peer - reviewed  scientific experts in the field  the largest and most objective body of reasoned thinkers on the planet about the subject.

 

Call them out! Latest example - Peter Dutton vs the ABC’s Leigh Sales

Wow style before content is the message Bolt is putting out here from the bleachers. Be more like high school debaters . The Liberal party MP's need to learn how to get their points across rather than the points themselves. It's a matter of technique. They need to look like  Bolt.  Watch how he comes across on the Bolt Report false and plastic. Remember the time he tried to call someone out and got so befuddled in the calling out that he wound up in the solipsist argument that history only began from when he was born. Solipsism is the belief your the only person in existence. Bolt lives his life that way.

Newspoll: Liberals 47 to 53

Nothing was as bad as the Qld election to remind us how unwanted Abbott was. Is this the litmus that tells us Abbott has changed been more consultative and collegiate and this government is now historically the best we have ever seen as he promised?

According to Murdoch man Dennis Shanahan  Abbott's Phar Lap and in the pink.