Showing posts with label Victimology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Victimology. Show all posts

Sunday, 6 November 2016

Andrew Bolt's Blog, 6/11/16; Punching down and crying victim at the same time; Contrast Rowan Dean and Andrew Bolt Bolt wants to look Cool sitting next to the Todd Samson of conservatives; Eichman had a list too like Bolt's;






 

The politics of race: look, but do not comment

 The politics of race: look, but do not comment

This is bullshit and lets face it is this the history as told not by both sides but by one  telling of a contract made. Which tribal elder or artist drew the picture showing a white man screwing the natives. It's a colonial story told repeatedly by white men throughout history.

 Bolt certainly doesn't sound as if he's ready for a frank discussion by the tone of his language. The circumstances in the drawing aren't up for discussion but instruction. Isn't that a discussion  a parent  has with a child or a headmaster with a student.  It's more a power play than an inquiry. The words Bolt uses seems to indicate the hair raised on the back of his neck "demands" doesn't suggest there is a  "request" even Bolt's instruction to us sounds grim "you may observe but not comment". It has the sense of a statement from a person who is in  authority an attitude which automatically makes you suspect there's a hidden subtext and what is being said is bullshit. Even more  when Bolt is saying things like this he tends to don his symbolic suit on. His symbolic cape of authority  the uniform of the the top end of town. You have to recall that Bolt is the man lawyers have a tendency to laugh at when he tries to sound like them because he's been told he's a dimwit at the law.

 Here is a video regarding treaties and contracts that insists we need to reflect on ones that were supposed to have been made in the past and just how many times the powerless were stitched up. It calls for reflection on what actually happened and was justice served? one.https://www.facebook.com/1672663969717320/videos/1680448275605556/  Why Can’t Australians face their racist reality? Colonial Shame!




 

Wicked law stops me answering this Aborigine's complaint

 Image result for Images of Wicked laws

Bolt is such a hysteric, a golem or incomplete human who seems to find Bill Leak's cartoons not just amusing but in no way racist and full of justified meaning. Bolt wants us to be free to be  more American in  expressing ourselves in the way we approach our Indigenous First Peoples, women children or who ever we want without interference. However he doesn't really defend this position but only attacks Section 18C of the RDA using free speech as his justification.

 Just how bright is our public intellectual? He keeps letting us know he is as indigenous too even more than those Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders born after him. He has also told us he's a  Dutch man who  never really identified with Australia for the first 30 years of his life  even though born here.  It apparently took his White Aussie  father-in-law to introduce him to our unique but not multicultural diverse identities. It seems  if Andrew Bolt is any indication he was only introduced  to only a aspect of our culture a very narrow and blinkered one. So Bolt admits it takes time to adapt but that time given him he refuses others today

Bolt has learnt to Punch Down and laugh at those he isn't or wasn't drawn to. He really doesn't  care if they arc up because they might be offended if they do he maintains it proves his bigoted point. He doesn't care because he found through marriage he had the power and the Cultural Capital not to be offended by any powerless push back. Bill Leak and Andrew Bolt laugh at their smug stereotyping of others and find superiority in their own privilege. Yet they are offended by when stereotyped themselves demanding that they are individuals.  Treating others as they do they call their right of  free speech. However it's not free at all and it's a cost and an expense to Australia as a nation. It's a cost to Democracy and we can see it in the round in this election that's occurring in the USA in which more so than ever the media for business and business alone has dumbed down rather than informed the electorate by this very notion of Free speech from which to some extent we are protected by Section 18C, Sexual harrassment laws, the right to be a pedophile and many other situations on which Bolt is silent.

Andrew Bolt was found guilty of lying and being loose with facts it's something he avoids. Had be not he would not have been convicted don't for a moment think his speech rights were infringed on. What Bolt isn't saying is as important as what he is.

Image result for Bill Leaks cartoonImage result for Bill Leaks cartoonImage result for Bill Leaks cartoon
 
 Andrew Bolt seems to wish we were Americans able to be like Donald Trump and to be able to treat our first peoples as they do their Indians.  Basically it's the way the world  currently see them at  Standing Rock and the DAPL protests using attack dogs and a militarized police force to break a n otherwise peaceful protest
The videos linked to this post show just  put Andrew Bolt into perspective when he cries victim and  feels he has missed out on justice because of Section 18C. In fact the RDA has saved us from further humiliation  than we have already historically treated ourselves to as a Settler Nation. We too could have Standing Rock events forcing our first peoples off their land.  Like the Americans Andrew Bolt denies no ignores the history  of our Aborigines a history experienced today  and continued   from generation to generation and still being revealed in the cultural punching down we still see today. Bolt accepts the colonists version of history and is like a holocaust denier who fails to accept that victims version. Please Follow this link it's worth the journey and self reflection.   Andrew Bolt and some Australians miss these childhood memories that Americans are allowed to indulge themselves in.

Degree of complaint at Queensland University of Triggology

 Image result for Images of a conservative clown

 Rowan Dean is currently Andrew Bolts favored Australian satirist. The only thing funny about these two is when you put them next to each other Bolt's anal in  a suit a presence and look he hopes makes him sound more believable. It's his uniform one which he hides behind. Rowan Dean  on the otherhand looks like an unmade bed. He's trying too hard to be cool the advertising man he once was the Todd Samson of commentators Mr  cool with the right wing message  trying to capture the minds of the millennials no doubt. The audience of  real comedians and satirists pack the auditoriums at  comedy festivals. Dean doesn't he is beholden to anybody that will give him a gig because he want one of his own.  At present he's doing the rounds as a guest used by every man who wants a trendy conservative to look relevant. He happens to be the conservative balance to guests on the left  on the ABC's Drum and the same conservative imbalance to make Bolt look more with it on the Bolt Report. It doesn't work Bolt doesn't look more cool and the conservative scales are just tipped even more to the right.
 It's not wrong for  Rowan Dean to be seen as the verbal cartoonist, the comic Bill Leak  ready to turn our First Peoples into a joke for the amusement of Bolt's show but not the amusement of the majority of decent Australians who believe in a fair go. However Bolt holds Dean up as the type migrant he believes Australia needs but who unfortunately don't really feel they need Australia. Now read the try hards comic approach that Andrew Bolt is so impressed with he's dumped Tim Blair who he sees as competition.

A list of the media's enemies of free speech

 Image result for Images of the freedom to lie

This blog is not by the overworked Andrew Bolt How is it Andrew Bolt never defines what he  means by Free Speech? The right for pedophiles to to talk dirty or simply talk seductively  to kids. The right of sexual opinion in the work place not being classified as harassment the right of people in bars discussing blowing up Andrew Bolt all of these freedoms are restricted by government intervention but not mentioned by Andrew Bolt as limitations on "Free Speech". So why is Bolt's interest so blinkered and narrow on the Section 18C of the RDA? It has nothing to do with Free Speech he wasn't convicted nor found guilty of just what he said had it been the truth and not lies had the facts been truthful he wouldn't have been found guilty. What Bolt is fighting for is the Freedom to lie the freedom that Donald Trump has and Fox News has in America. The freedom to dumb down a nation and democracy to promote business over journalism. The reason the list is so long among professional journalists is because there are ethics involved that Andrew Bolt doesn't give a toss about as long as he has the means to luxuriate his  and others lifestyles.




 

 

Where did Turnbull, the free speech warrior, go?

 Image result for Images of responsible speech warriors

 

Bolt want's this in Australia  and Credlin says we are ready but it entails Free Speech and an uninformed electorate. We are better than that Australia.

This post is not by the overworked Andrew Bolt . The forces gathered in today's posts are forces fighting for the right to lie offend and punch down and entirely privatize media making it a battle between   media whose business model  is working for the sector of community where the money is or rounding up the subscriptions of individuals to support the voices of non unionized consumers and labor the bulk of individuals in society who merely have 20% of the wealth. Rounding up cats isn't the easiest of jobs so Logic dictates that the MSM business model has to be based on not offending the 1% with the money. If speech is to be free it needs to be informed and not a battle of the liars. It's why a referee is necessary because what Bolt politicians and the right wing prescribe is the deregulation of speech and not it's freedom and that is a major cost to us all with little or nobody to clean it up. Do we want to be American Bolt does and so does Murdoch.

 

Who let him in? What will Labor say to the girl? 

 Image result for Images of selective blame

Andrew Bolt without doubt reflects the worst of Australia and he does it simply by distorting the facts. His catalogue of "Who Let Them In" is a  cherry picked suicide vest catalogue of selected grenades and is a case in point of just how verbally cruel maniacal and self destructive the uneducated wealthy can be. Bolt is the Donald of Australian media.

1 Australia is a Multicultural country and that's reflected in everything from our best corporate role models to our worst criminals. The crime rates indicate that those of us that have been here the longest are proportionately more comfortable and less shy and as such are likely to commit  more crimes including rape. The types of crimes comitted are distinguished more by class position than on a cultural basis.

2 Bolt however by selectively cherry picking events where refugees, migrants from Africa and Muslims have been accused creates an almanac a record that is intended to imply his list of deplorables  are more likely  to be lawbreakers when they in fact  aren't. They  are exceptions.   Exceptions infact are the living proof that in fact the opposite is the rule and as such his despised Cultural groups are in fact the least likely in Australia's multicultural population to be the criminals.

3 Conclusion: Andrew Bolt like any vigilante wants to prove his point  so he cherry picks  these cases for his "list" for one purpose only to fit his anti- immigrant,racist, Ilamophobic political narrative. His ledger of fear if read between the lines uses multiculturalism and immigration for political purpose the way all ultra right wingers have done throughout history. Today it's the Nazi parties in the EU the KKK in the US  UKIP in the UL and One Nation in Australia. Andrew Bolt and the Liberals have been stoking this fire since the Tampa but it's been used before. 

Credlin: we're ready for a Trump, too

Image result for Images of Fine Cotton the horseAmazing Trumplandia is being encouraged here in Australia. It began with the importing of Tea Party Politics and the division it represented in the Republican Party where the tail was wagging the dog the result in Australia was seen in the same tactics of fear patriotism and National Security that gave us a lying and exceedingly disliked Tony Abbott. One would have thought he was our Donald Trump he lied and kept putting his foot in his mouth that the Liberals dumped him. They the conservatives keep threatening to tear the party apart and Peter Credlin claims we are ready for a rebirth of yet another Trump and even names the candidates to LEAD  THIS COUNTRY TO BE GREAT AGAIN .

Who does Credlin name  Hanson, Bernardi, Abbott, and Hastie. None are the canny businessmen she claims the 4 times bankrupt Trump is. Trump is railing against politicians on all sides who is doing that amongst this crew all career pollies except Hastie the colt from WA. No what Credlin is doing is suggestion it's a race however she has a Fine Cotton  still in this one dressed as an unlikely to run and that's Abbott.  He's no Trump but the chump wants to come back.

Friday, 16 October 2015

Andrew Bolt's Blog, 16/10/15; Bolt's bull on multiculturalism; Bolt wants hate speech legislated; Class war and politics; CFMEU, Why did we let Bolt in; Climate science is a religion according to the science of denial; Indonesia on a rampage blinkered Bolt It's all Obama's Fault Blinkered Bolt;

 

 

 

 

On The Bolt Report on Sunday, October 18

Channel 10 cancelled it last week and has yet again kicked it from pillar to post. It's so highly rated you see and was given the attention they believe it deserves. 

It was them for free by Murdoch as an Advertorial against the ALP. How is it that's it's not regarded as a donation to the LNP?  Notice how Bolt's ego has been dented yet again.

"Terribly sorry, but yet more time changes because of car races. It’s a miracle you’ve stuck with us:"Bolt

 

 

 

 

 

What are universities doing to stop international students from cheating and free-loading?

When Universities are forced to operate on a commercial model to attract overseas students for the purpose of self financing. When tutors, lecturers and senior lecturers have no tenure and the success or failure of departments and courses  depends simply on supply and demand. When the expectations of students is little more than the paper chase for courses offering the false promise of jobs, excellence runs a significant last. What we see are reports and complaints that come from a clash of expectations that don't match reality. 

The Education industry has become so important to the economy is it at all unusual the a VW attitude has become the norm. Sell courses and ensure they succeed at any cost even if the promise is false. Students returning home have a premium piece of paper. Local students have been sold a debt on false expectations that there's any number of jobs available for say lawyers. So much so one law company was seen selling internships for $27,000 why? False promises.

 Christopher Pyne under  the Abbott government wanted to adopt the failing American model of privatized tertiary education that is fast becoming bankrupt in the US leaving students with nothing but an immense debt and no future. America is now actively supporting a return to government supported education to reduce student debt that is now in the trillions of dollars.

 

No, we’re not multicultural - or shouldn’t be

 This is what we should have said: “You are welcome to our country. We will greet you, but we expect certain conditions to be met in relation to cultural assimilation.”

What Bolt and Phelps expect is for Greeks and Italians to give up their very strong traditions it would seem.

"If one goes through the list of the six key determinants of culture—language, law, religion, food, clothing and entertainment—one finds that they are overwhelmingly British"

There are quite a number that have been here for 30 and 40 years that have never found it a necessity to become fluent English speakers. Particularly those little old Greek and Italian ladies dressed in black. Language,religion,food,clothing and entertainment still separates them today as much as it did when they arrived in the 50s and 60s. The integration comes with their children and not overnight. It was the  same with Vienamese and Chinese and it's why we encouraged the notion of multiculturalism it softens all attitudes and creates a bridge between communities rather than the gap and stress that rapid assimilation demands. It's why we have China Town, Little Vietnam, Little Italy, The Italian clubs , The Greek Clubs.

Australia has a shortage of skilled labor we advertise but get no response  from Bolt and Phelp's preferred migrants. Many worked in the car industry Abbott ensured it's death as it did in many areas of manufacturing. Bolt and Phelps in their bigoted way refuse to even accept that most Asylum seekers are professionals whether legal or illegal simply because they are Muslim. They tell us they can't speak English which is another lie as many are multi lingual. There is no evidence they are a greater burden on us either due to social welfare or criminality. 

It's why Bolt and Phelps are talking a load of crock. They are blind to what has happened in the past and is still happening now. Multiculturalism is a journey, a path to assimilation that doesn't just occur over night and it's what has happened in all  the settler countries like Australia, USA, Canada and NZ. What is exclusive to Australia is we call them "New Australian" Nobody in the world is regarded as a New American, New Canadian, ,New New Zealander. There they are Indian Americans, Polish Americans and proud to be Americans. Just as proud a Lebanese here are proud to be Australians.  When do Phelps and Bolt suggest that their end is achieved? Obviously never when Phelp's criteria are held a the standard Richmond's Houli needs to be judged by.  When does one become Australian? 50% of us have a first or second generation connection to a migrant family.

 Bolt and Phelps believe in far more restrictive immigration, a white judeo christian culture that will produce our apartheid in the Pacific. Yet they expect all the benefits of being respected global citizens however with none of the responsibilities to realities that surround us..

 

 

 

 

 

Few fighters for free speech in Parliament

Bolt's notion of protecting "free speech" is in fact the ideal of protecting uncivilized abuse and hate speech rather than civilized reasoned and persuasive speech. Since 1979 the courts haven't been over flowing with vilification cases in fact there have been very few. Except for Bolt's  case I can't recollect any. So why the urgency if it's only to legislate the right of abuse. Conservatives  talk of the fact that it will free up the courts which is patently false. In an authoritarian system abuse, vilification and threat readily flows from the top down. The army boot camp is a perfect example where the sargent can say anything he wants to the recruits in any number of ways and it substantiates his authority. The grunts don't have the same right of either power or control.

In democratic society the playing field isn't equal and nor is 'free speech".It is freer for some than others. The flow also reflects the power and control. It's why Bolt's case was so apparent because the situation was reversed.  Free speech might be an ideal as is the want of an equal playing field but it's not the fact. Bigot's don't have the right to be bigots and nor should they.  People do need to be protected from uncivilized abuse and hate speech and any legislation that allows it lowers the concept of civil society.

 

 


Labor’s pathetic class war

Link Paywall to Murdoch's Australian.

" Pathetic. What you’d expect from someone who’s been a union hack from her student days."Andrew Bolt

Stephanie Balogh is pathetic because she's been a 'union hack' since her student days. We can't say that of Bolt as he was a student for such a short time no one remembers him. But that can be said of Tony Abbott Joe Hockey or Christopher Pyne who were basically Liberal hacks since their student days. They must be deemed pathetic as well and they were.

So the politics of envy entails anybody belonging to the 99% of the Australian electorate asking questions of the 1%. However it doesn't apply when  the investigation is directed in the other direction  and the top 1% are asking questions of the 99% as they are in the Royal Commission. The Top 1% tax returns are protected.

 

 

 

Richardson: Shorten must suspend the CFMEU

Link paywall to Murdoch's Australian

" So Turnbull needs to be taken down personally, but Shorten also needs to step up:"Andrew Bolt

 Andrew Bolt  sounds like a man who wants Malcolm Turnbull brought down. Why is it Shorten needs to suspend the CFMEU when 7/11 doesn't require any suspension? Developers can start Phoenix companies and rip people off as often as they want. That the CBA doesn't require any action other than an apology?

 Why is it that union members aren't required to sit on company boards as they are in Germany making the whole system less adversarial. Why is it that suspensions are always only applied to union the  worker associations?

 

 

 

 

Goodbye to Egypt

 Why did we let them in? 

Had we known  what this son of Dutch migrants would be doing in Australia in the 2000s when they arrived in 1958 the same question might well have been asked of them. Andrew Bolt has been involved in so many defamation and vilification cases that he hardly stands out as a person of good character or a model citizen. When he argues his points he switches sides to suit the occasion he flips and flops.  He's an innocent speaking the truth who doesn't vilify or disparage Muslims he's the model Australian in his own opera. It's Muslim victimology that actually makes them reverse racists who threaten Bolt's safety. He has applied this same argument against the indigenous people that took him to court but it didn't wash with the judge. Bolt still cries that he was the victim of unfair laws. 

It's strange Bolt believes everything ISIS has to say but generally finds it hard to believe what  Australians generally have to say, particularly if they accuse Andrew Bolt of driving them to the point of violence. When that happens Bolt  says , "see I told you so victimology". There is every reason the laws surrounding Section 18C should be made stricter because Andrew Bolt  and those like him do incite violence or the threat of violence as the email below shows.

This email is crude but it is an understandable response to Bolt's vilification and religious hatred of Muslims that he has been spreading for years. However he get's hate in return he then immediately cries victim and "why did we let them in". If one understands the history of what went before and what generated this sort of reaction the question is more valid when asked of Andrew Bolt. Why did we let him in? Let's hope Malcolm Turnbull has a closer look at Andrew Bolt.

image

 

 

Je suis Charlie? French weatherman dumped for questioning the warming faith

Link The Telegraph

" No wonder so few scientists dare speak out against this cult:"

97% of the worlds best known and peer-reviewed scientists agree on the issue of global warming and Bolt call's it a "cult" The 3% who disagree with global warming according to Bolt that are the "real" scientists of the day. That's akin to saying Eric Abetz was right when he linked cancer to abortions and all the medical researchers that laughed at him were just members of a religious cult.

Yet again Bolt takes a single issue of a weatherman in France who has nothing to do with science or research  but is only tied up with the politics and opinions that surround the science he  however is the man to be heard.  Bolt distorts what's happening as evidence against science and it's method.   Just by calling science a "cult"  merits as refutation of the scientific process  and is sufficient to reduce it to voodoo.

The politics of French TV is the politics of French TV they haven't a clue or care who Andrew Bolt is they do care that an employee went outside the bounds of his contract

 

War-cry of the modern Leftist revolutionary: stop or I’ll cry

Link Andrew Bolt, Tim Blair 

What's this but churlish mudslinging from the conservative right attacking what they see as the conservative left. I'm afraid it's more like Bolt's looking in a mirror and sliming the reverse image of  himself without realizing it. This is the sort of unsightly insight-less "free speech"  that he believes our laws need to protect. Someone is free to abuse handicapped children to their face just because they have the right to be bigots and it's too subjective for our courts to deal with. The courts didn't think so in Bolt's case.

 

 

 

Muslims burn church in Aceh

Link Jakarta Post

 

" Christians persecuted in Indonesia:" Andrew Bolt

"Muslims persecuted in Australia " example

Andrew Bolt's banner has as much validity as the example below it if it was a  banner about Bendigo.  Bolt simply doesn't tell the whole story only his because he has  vested interest in promoting Islamophobia. He has no interest in reporting  what really happened was a dipute  as much about local politics as it was about religion. No, Bolt would rather suggest that 350 mill Indonesians had the Christians in their crosshairs and their backs to the wall. Yes disputes happen even here. They don't define Australia as local disputes don't define Indonesia.

In typical Bolt style you only get part of the story. In 1979 and agreement was made between the Muslim and Christian communities that only one church and four small Christian houses of worship would be built in the district of Aceh Singkil. The church became one of 10 and the broken agreement was protested after a peaceful 36 years. At a meeting between all parties protestors, church board members and officials it was agreed that the churches would be demolished on October 19th.

The President Jokowi was quite clear and no Christian Indonesia is not burning or being put to the sword.

"Stop the violence in Aceh Singkil whatever the reason behind it not to mention if it's related to religion or faith it will kill diversity" President Jokowi

“Stop violence in Aceh Singkil. Any act of violence, whatever the reasons behind it, not to mention if it is related to religion and faith, will kill diversity —Jkw,” President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo said on Wednesday on his Twitter account @jokowi. - See more at: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/10/15/thousands-leave-aceh-after-church-burning.html#sthash.qo39HvVX.fGXMeaIj.dpuf

 

The church was one of 10 in the regency that was protested by the Islamic group. At a recent meeting at the regency office between the protesters, the churches’ board members and local officials, it was reportedly agreed that the churches would be demolished on Oct. 19 - See more at: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/10/15/thousands-leave-aceh-after-church-burning.html#sthash.qo39HvVX.fGXMeaIj.dpuf
The church was one of 10 in the regency that was protested by the Islamic group. At a recent meeting at the regency office between the protesters, the churches’ board members and local officials, it was reportedly agreed that the churches would be demolished on Oct. 19 - See more at: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/10/15/thousands-leave-aceh-after-church-burning.html#sthash.qo39HvVX.fGXMeaIj.dpuf
The church was one of 10 in the regency that was protested by the Islamic group. At a recent meeting at the regency office between the protesters, the churches’ board members and local officials, it was reportedly agreed that the churches would be demolished on Oct. 19 - See more at: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/10/15/thousands-leave-aceh-after-church-burning.html#sthash.qo39HvVX.fGXMeaIj.dpuf

 

 

 

 

Obama keeps troops in Afghanistan

Link CNN, FP

What Bolt fails to remind us of all these wars we see today were inherited from the Republicans. Charlie's War financed the Mushadin in Afghanistan which became the Taliban. Why? To get the Russians out of course and gain control of oil in Kazakhstan. It gave birth to Al Qaeda. They invaded Iraq under the guise WMDs and gave birth to Al Qaeda in Iraq which morphed into ISIS two years ago. Obama didn't create what we see today. He inherited it. The American people voted for him and voted because they wanted out of Iraq and Afghanistan they knew they had another Vietnam on their hands and didn't want more body bags flown home.

" Obama refused to seriously engage in Syria, again creating a vacuum filled by the Islamic State - and now Russia."

Syria was never an overt American war it was covert. They assisted the rebels that now Bolt wants bombed. Some  of these rebels morphed into ISIS not because the US had left Iraq but because of the the Sunni disenchantment with the Shite run Iraqi government, because they had the equipment supplied by the US to them in Syria and they had the military trained leaders of Saddam's elite army in strategic command. Some were even trained by the Americans. They were able  to make a rapid move into Iraq not because of any vaccuum created the Sunnis tribes were always in Nth Eastern Iraq and the Anbar Province was their natural home. The Sunni population merely supported rebels and welcomed them  over the repressive Malaki Shite Government in Baghdad. The notion of Iraq as a sovereign entity had become meaningless to them.

  There was no vacuum filled by Russia either as Bolt claims. Russia has been in Syria for years and has always had a naval base there. Russia has always been the underwriters of the Assad regime. To suggest Russia and Iran had just moved into a vacuum in Syria is ludicrous.  The whole Syrian war began because the Sunni Nth were starving due to a 6 year drought and famine and they asked for assistance from their government. When denied they protested but only found bullets and bombs in reply.

Bolt's whole interpretation of the Middle East as being a Democrat error is nothing more than Republican propaganda. Yes all these wars were due to American involvement and a serious error of judgement in pursuit of American interests. However the actions began with Republican aggression and has now dissolved into Democrat headache attempting to mitigate  unwanted aggression which has resulted in a mess and very complex situation. The Repulicans have no solution to nor does Bolt. Any criticism is about the 2016 elections only. It really has nothing to do with the Middle East.