Andrew Bolt's Blog,28/4/17; Wayne Swan Good Debt Tony Abbott Bad Debt the big Con; Thank You ABC; Bolt in action;

"GOOD" DEBT? WHAT A CON

My editorial from The Bolt Report : the Turnbull Government says its Budget will distinguish between "good debt" and "bad debt". But is there any difference - and would you really trust a government to know it?

  So Bolt has  dragged the IPA's Dr Sin ( Sinclair} out to  disparage the Turnbull budget. The head of their right wing rag  the  Catallaxy Files  to explain Economics 101 to us because sure as hell Andrew Bolt can't. It's simple in business there is a very old Jewish saying "use other peoples money to make a profit". That is  good debt That is banking That is the Stock Exchange.
As a wholesaler you come to understand more often than not that you are in the credit business not the product business and Capitalism is the debt business. Your only as good as the credit you can provide. In order to do that you will have debt on your books and it's an  asset.  It's the debt you accrue the credit you get get from your suppliers and which you can pass on to your clients to generate a profit. As an asset  clearly it's a good debt and it generates  profit for the business. However because there is no certainty in business which Bolt acknowledges exists and demarks good from bad  you can't trust governments to know the difference. There is no con good debt does exist.

The Con:  Debt is a government no go zone should not be involved in debt good or bad only private interests have the right of profit.Government involvement in the national economy is minimal spending and the facilitation of private profit.

 Bolt promoted Abbott and Hockey as our saviors from the GFC at a time of growing debt they were the better money managers. Swan who was voted the world's best Treasurer was a waste of space. Remember the domestic cry from Bolt, News Corp and the opposition the sky was falling in and all those pre election promises of "no cuts" but better management Tony would fix it.. That was the great con that that Tony and Joe would fix it. When in government Hockey and Abbott sold the story was it was worse than they imagined the books had been cooked and it would take longer to fix. We'd heard that bullshit before  and it wasn't long before Abbott could no longer hold that line.The  domestic message the sky was falling in was being pushed by News Corp and 2GB. However they couldn't tell that to the world could they it would drive investors away. Hockey was telling NZ and other countries there wasn't an economic emergency at all that the economy was great. The con or jig was up and it showed in the polls. So finally Abbott said after the second budget we 'fixed' the debt problem and have turned it around the "emergency" is over. However we no longer believed him. He had raised the debt ceiling to $500bill, borrowed and spent for political gain and show rather than  the dough and national benefit. Abbott was Peter Foster and had banned his party from the ABC because they asked the real questions

The GFC may have started a debt run  but the LNP have tripled it since 2013 with little to show in return.  Abbott's NBN , Abbott's war, Abbott's national security and Abbott's ABF all were bad debts. Cuts to Education, Health, Pensions Housing and the ABC were put in place and not a good debt to show for it.  They certainly didn't produce any income only a cost. Abbott's detention centers and flags were all for show but not a necessity. They were the con and Abbott and Hockey spent like there was no tomorrow and kept saying they had fixed the budget and their debt was "good" not frivolous. The Con didn't improve with Turnbull but it wasn't accompanied with lies and deceit  delivered by Abbott and Hockey. That's the story Bolt fails to tell it's as if Abbott and Hockey never existed and it's all Turnbull's doing. The horse had bolted.

 

ABC DOES TERRORISM REPORT WITHOUT ONCE MENTIONING "ISLAM"

The ABC revels in a new euphemism for Islam. It's "fixated".  This allows it to file a long report on a new terrorism unit without once mentioning Islam negatively. Watch the astonishing evasion for yourself.

 Andrew Bolt does "terrorism" regularly even globally declaring every crime of public violence as one committed by Muslims when he's able. However he gets it totally wrong as many times as he's right. He's totally random in his selection of evidence all it has to do is seem possible. However the problem is he is a news source and has a platform  and when and if he gets it wrong you never hear from him again on that specific event. It's published distributed  put out to the public but never withdrawn or admitted it's wrong, fake news, vilification or religious bigotry. Andrew Bolt's  primary activity is not news and commentary but propaganda.

Bolt never apologized for his cock up report he did of the German bus carrying a football club being blown up but not by Muslim terrorists. Bolt didn't say sorry for the Cheurfi shooting of police in Paris that was officially declared non terrorist. As I said wrong or right Bolt  declared these acts were of Muslim Terror just to get his Islamophobic message delivered. It's never been retracted and never will be.

 You can't believe what Bolt says as his purpose is vilification and unless corrected are also lies. You can just imagine Bolt writing opinion pieces against the Jews in pre war Germany they'd be very much the same and getting worse as the war progressed. Once again thanks for the ABC

TWO MORE TERROR INCIDENTS IN BRITAIN

Having imported a culturally antagonistic minority, Britain now deals with the predictable consequences. First: "A man (pictured) was arrested near Westminster after allegedly trying to launch a terror attack." Second: "A woman has been shot by police and four people were arrested during an anti-terror operation in north west London and Kent."

  Notice the photo above it could be mistaken for Melbourne and that's Bolt's purpose

As I said above Bolt's agenda isn't to report facts but to get his racist ethnocentric altra nationalist anti- immigration message across. He conflates crimes of  violence  and threats with "terror"  as if they have a single explanation. He only reports on those  committed by dark skinned non white non Christians or those that fit that possibility. His message they are intent on destroying us and we need to fight back and stop being so piss weak. 

None of the events Bolt conflates have any correlation, connection or relevance one to the other. Crime is far more prevalent in Australia committed by Australians and is generally white. So  Bolt  to be convincing will turn to the children of immigrant Australians to prove his point  and if that's not convincing enough he will turn  to those kids whose grandparents were immigrants. As long as they can be squeezed into thos categories of people he dislikes . Bolt's persistent anti- Muslim, anti- coloured  ethnocentric message is all Bolt wants to deliver and deliver it with unconnected evidence gleaned from anywhere in the world.  Because if he turned to the real facts, statistics and figures relating to what it is he is trying to say locally and nationally  he'd be shown to be wrong and the fool he is. Advertizers should take responsibility for who it is they are sponsoring.

Rightwing False Flag: German Officer Posed as Syrian Refugee, Planned Attack | Informed Comment

 Bolt fails to list reports like this because they don't fit his over all message. Bolt is an enabler of right wing terror

"The man knew no Arabic and is of German heritage, but successfully posed as a Syrian …"

"Another man was also arrested in connection to the terror plot, a 24-year-old student from the officer’s home town of Offenbach.
“We know from various voice recordings that both men had anti-foreigner views,” the prosecutor’s spokesman said."

 

AUSTRIAN PRESIDENT; ALL WOMEN MAY HAVE TO WEAR HEADSCARFS

Peak submission: "The president of Austria [said] there may come a day when all women are asked to wear headscarves out of solidarity, citing discrimination faced by Muslims in the country. ... 'With the widely spreading

"One way to stop the threat of Islam is to simply convert. This may appeal to the Austrian president, who preaches submission." Bolt

 Bolt the traditionalist romances the times before his birth the romantic post war 50's have a fond place in his heart because that was his mothers era her youth and Andrew was very much mummy's boy. That was a time when the streets of Australia saw women  with gloves and head wear if out of the house a time when we were all converts to fashion. A time Bolt approves of. He was born into a conservative family he is a conservative and he'd be red faced in a room of tits and ass


 

LIB GURU: TURNBULL GOVERNMENT "HATES THEIR OWN CONSTITUENTS"

Liberal strategist Geoffrey Greene: “The Turnbull government is at war with the people. This is a government which hates their own constituents. The Liberal Party has lost touch with what it stands for and will be decimated unless it changes tack." Which is really what Tony Abbott has said, too. 

What a load of trash Bolt posts attributing what Greene says to Tony Abbott who lost the the faith of the electorate the moment he stepped into office.  Abbott never won an election the Labor party lost one  doing what the Liberal Party is doing now being weighted down by Tony Abbott. Abbott not only lost faith with the electorate but with the party as well and there isn't a poll that says otherwise. Throughout his PMship  how many times did we hear that he'd promis to "change". Bolt was constantly telling us what a nice guy he really was it didn't happen.Turnbull was the great white hope but his  success was hampered by an adversarial political culture left behind by Abbott Mr Nope Nope Nope, one that fails to identify issues and problem solve first on behalf of all of us.. Simply following the wishes of their financial donors  won't cut it because they are no longer united.  Simply put Turnbull failed to wedge the ALP on Climate Change, Immigration, and Defense. He unlike Abbott is not the favored son of News Corp or the IPA anymore but then neither is Abbott. The electorate will get their message across but not necessarily with either of them
The 24/7 news cycle  and social media coupled with the explosion of advisers now employed by everyone has decreased the generalized spread of the Liberal message. It's so un-united that it hardly seems to be a party any longer just a bunch of individuals at war. Their constituents now merely see a Hydra.