Saturday, 15 August 2015

Andrew Bolt's Blog 15/8/15; Socialism is just a dirty word to Bolt; Mamma Mia why aren't conservatives funny? Sliming the truth; Austerity is heaven for Bolt; Abbott is playing Politics couldn't give a stuff about your heart; Zacky,Abbott and Bolt are fingers on one hand; The Age is not News Corp;

 

 

 

You are funding a state media which promotes Islamism. UPDATE: Another Lyons’ claim denied

Proof of the pathetic standard of media we can expect if News Corp gained control of the ABC. Bolt deals in rumors, innuendo distortion and deflection to push ideology. In this case his side in order to do whatever it takes to discredit the ABC.

At his worst he never apologizes unless brought to bear by News Corp's legal advisers. When ever he does "I should have been more sceptical, given the byline.  Ebeid denies: " as you can expect. It's an apology in small print so the stench of his original complaint not only remains but  is repeated.

So why has Bolt chosen to offer minimum apology? He had vengence on his mind. Bolt wanted to get own back on another News Corp drone John Lyons. But Bolt who failed to verify anything he was talking about was left with egg on his face again because Lyons didn't write what Bolt was accusing him of.

" It seems it was more the headline (which Lyons didn’t write) than Lyon’s copy which really went too far."

This whole blog is in fact an apology however it doesn't read like one and the banner remains. It's News Corp operating like only News Corp does.

 

NewsCcorp is the least trusted

 

 

 

 

  

The benefits of Chavez socialism

Link Bolt 2010 Link Powerline the American Tea Party ezine 

The difference between Democratic Socialists and The Australian Liberal Party and it's supporters is their general acceptance that all Socialism and what it has or even had to offer is bad. Whereas Socialists prefer to verify the data and search for the truth. It's why you hear very little about Cuba or what occurred in Kerala India after the first Communist Party came to power. Bolt never talks about Uraguay but will tell you a terrorist became President. Socialists want to know Liberals just spin. Only 553 people own 50% of the total wealth of the USA.

It's why all the decisions Liberals make are behind closed doors and the for and against arguments are never presented in public. Paranoia seems to be governing ambiance and not the good of the Nation. It was so much healthier watching the ALP conference in action with all it's transparency. There's was no threatening doctors, nurses, teachers, and journalists there with jail.

The Dutch Guarantee in Utrecht is not the only City

 income unconditionally granted to all its residents on an individual basis, without a means test or work requirement.

 

 

 

 

Not the principle but the side - the Mia Freedman example

Yes it's the side and not the principle says the pot calling the kettle black. Markson misses she should go back and look at the countless blogs shared by Tim Blair and Andrew Bolt over the past year pleasuring themselves in demeaning women. There is however one truth. They are not funny. The thing that escapes us all is the right wing commentators are never funny when the content of what they have to say is examined. However gather them in any photo shoot and they are hilarious. Bolt's aggrieved white man's spear throwing was embarrassing not funny Charlie Pickering  you made it funny however and showed it for what it was...dumb.

 

 

 

Why Labor and its media mates are sliming a good judge

Link Bolt's answer is to be found in Quadrant heaven help us it's coupled with Gerard Henderson.

When A comes before B in time and space and are co-joined one might consider that there was a necessary connection between the two  then A caused B can reasonably be implied. Which when all is said and done  the good judge and the Liberal Party slimmed each other before any media or the Labour Party got hold of it. It might be argued that the ALP and the media caused it all to be revealed after the sliming had been well and truly done and the slime is little more than the track left behind by these two slugs. 

However more to the point is the judge and his advisers weren't astute enough to realize the dangers of what was occurring they claim innocence. However when judges are concerned ignorance is definitely no excuse. The Liberal party have made that perfectly clear when trying to slime Professor Triggs and Peter Slipper  Would Dyson Heydon have skewered his own conduct had a unionist done it?

 

 

Dyson Heydon and the MSM 

Union officials could take legal action against Dyson Heydon, says law expertRead more: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/union-officials-could-take-legal-action-against-dyson-heydon-says-law-expert-20150813-giypt3.html#ixzz3irihHNfM


 

 

 

 

 

If Fairfax were fair, it might admit there’s no real clash. It might also embrace a referendum

Link Canberra Times 

Do we now have to have a plebiscite on whether a plebiscite is to be held in conjunction with a referendum? When the Liberals get their heads together to make things appear less simple than they in fact are you can be sure it has nothing to do with the issue but everything to do with the politic. If it's as simple as it's made out to be why isn't it to be held now?

 

 

 

Labour falls for socialism all over again

Link News Corp's Greg Sheridan

Bolt uses the word Socialism as a constraint and Austerity forced on individuals as a form of Liberation. Individuals have no economic or social rights which haven't been earned is the myth in a society whose earned wealth in fact is rooted in inheritance. That's the only form of history Bolt espouses to. All other histories are a danger to the fundamental principles of Capitalism ant the wealth of the status quo.

 

 As anti-austerity candidate surges: 'Corbynomics' catches fire in UK

 

 

 

I repeat: Abbott’s same-sex marriage “disaster” is actually a triumph. Two tips to seal that deal

Link None Unsourced All Bolt

Paul Kelly says it's what it is  "the idea of a national vote seems the best outcome for the Abbott government." It's not a a moral or cultural choice but political ploy. There is little interest in the idea of a peoples choice that's been already polled countless times and 72% agree with. So if a plebiscite is to be held why hold it after the next election? Because it can be used a for political advantage this term. The Liberal Party believe that forcing it to a representational vote at the next election will not only make it look closer than it is but the false slogan we are for the children, free religious belief and tradition rather than we all have rights to be treated the same can be twisted and it will be. Love has nothing to do with this.

 Backbencher speaks out

 

 

You are funding a state media which promotes Islamism

Link News Corp's Paywall

Andrew Bolt the Aussie who supports Reclaim Australia, treats anything said by ISIS and anyone supporting ISIS as gospel, the man who refuses to accept the words of Australians unless they are die hard Liberals accuses SBS  of being an Islamist promoter.

Bolt even still can't have Zacky Mullah  on the same page as Tony Abbott though Zacky like Abbott wants ISIS targets in Syria bombed and destroyed. Yes they are the same but we simply don't like him because he's a Muslim can only be Bolt's reasoning. No Bolt says he went to jail over 11 years ago. That's Mullah's crime he doesn't wear a blue tie and has done time. Mullah in fact will show himself to be like Abbott and Bolt politically but that's what Bolt does not want because the the whole Q&A debacle will be seen for what it was a ploy for political advantage on the part of Abbott.

 

 

 

The Age chokes on its hatred of Abbott

Link SMH

Even the reporting of the fact of Dyson Heydon's  monumental blunder of accepting the post of main speaker at lawyers function that turned out to be a Liberal fund raiser questions the mans diligence and competence. All this is hailed by Bolt as indicative of the  hatred for Abbott. Is Bolt suggesting all these Liberals involved together with Heydon conspired to bring down Abbott? Even the left don't go that far. However Bolt would if it meant saving the boss.

 Tony Abbott should  have shut up and not defended Dyson Heydon. Abbott threw fuel on the fire by supporting him as he did Bishop. Are we going to have to wait 18 days for him to change his mind? Could you imagine the furor if Gillian Triggs was found to be guest speaker at a Labour fundraiser? What sort of incompetent Liberal organizers, advisers and commissioners has Tony Abbott PM appointed? Tim Wilson independent commissioner was appointed by Tony Abbott is only happy to speak at Liberal  fund raisers. The whole PMO is ditsy.

Flipping the argument is just a vacuous  debating tactic Bolt uses when he has no argument. Turning the accused into the aggrieved by ignoring the sequence of causal events. Heydon is accused because he put his hand up to speak. He negotiated with Liberal organizers and Abbott defended him. Heydon and Abbott are not the hard done by and The AGE is both reporting and commentating on a matter of fact.

"Conservative buyers of The Age should realise they are subsidising the most extreme and misleading propaganda."

What is misleading in the presentation of the facts as they occurred? Is Bolt suggesting that none of this happened and it's all confected? Heydon admitted it  did and the Liberal Party advertised it as they did with Tim Wilson. Bolt is not putting words in Heydon's mouth he's taking the out spin is spin. He's even misrepresenting what Peter Hartcher is saying.

Peter Hartcher has called it what it was an astonishing cock up. Bolt on the other hand is calling anything other than what it was and Abbott should have shut up. The whole thing is another fiasco.

" The astonishing misjudgment that led the royal commissioner into trade union corruption, Dyson Heydon, to agree to speak at a Liberal Party fundraiser was the most unexpected blow to a punchdrunk party."

 

You can't make this stuff up 

 Dyson Heydon, head of the Royal Commission into Trade Union Governance and Corruption, was to be the guest speaker at a Liberal Party function.

No comments: