No better on the other side of the camera
Criticism coming from the worst anchorman on Australian TV. Andrew Bolt looks and moves like one of the Thunderbirds dressed in a Peter Jackson's suit. He waves his hands about like an over excited puppet. If anybody disagrees with him he moves the program on rather than allowing the person to continue. His laugh is so insincere and at times he's to eager to talk and not to listen.
Furthermore he's totally surrounded by the News Corp hive and/or friends. As a news show it's not. As a comedy it's not. As a farce it's spot on. What a joke Andrew Bolt talks about the respect due Tony Abbott PM and leads by example paying none to Rudd. People especially like Bolt who live in glass houses really can't afford to throw stones. They make far better targets.
The ABC hands the microphone to any passing Abbott hater
Bolt is a part of News Corp the mad media who want all other media to give the mad right a 2% fringe the microphone. Not for 2% of the time but for 50% of the otherwise they'll scream foul and favour until blue in the face . Isn't Bolt's slogan No foul No favour? Histrionics & hysteria , is their right and they find space and sympathy for it at News Corp and have their defender in Andrew Bolt. Given that their inalienable right of a voice is given so much air time with Bolt do other sources of media really need to give them the % time Bolt maintains they deserve?
Bolt it seems is entitled to lie about Noel Pearson as long as he's careful not to call him black. Bolt constantly attributes to Pearson things he doesn't say it's that that needs stronger regulation as Pearson doesn't have permanent hold of a microphone like Bolt. Bolt like Pearson however is part of the 2% minority. Pearson however doesn't demand to be given 50% of media time. Bolt declares his side victims if they don't get it. Pearson's side however is victim and has 220 years of history to prove it.
Does the News Corp hive and it's drones offer the media time they demand to those they oppose no! Do they disallow media time to those they oppose and want shut down, yes! Their constant " hate speech" is too free and needs to be regulated and they agree when it suits them. In the case of Gerard Henderson he " had to listen as three anonymous listeners were given the opportunity by the 774 producer and presenter to call me “a racist” — to which I had no effective right of reply. That's Henderson's response to live talk back it needs editing.
No foul no favour Andrew Bolt edits out negative comments on his blog in order to show he has majority support and says "the ABC is out of control". Sell the ABC to Murdoch is his want.
Bolt supports disadvantaged media Breitbart News Slammed For Race-Baiting Article On Shooting Of Two VA Journalists
How this campaign to destroy a union corruption-buster started
Link Mike Smith News.com
Yet again everybody fails to mention the Sheriff's admissions. They are just as obviously unimportant as now is man himself in all this. Bolt couldn't give a rats about Heydon it's all about saving the fallen integrity of the Royal Commission. That needs saving not even the rules of how it's run are important. The conclusions have already been written by Andrew Bolt non journalist, non critical or objective thinker. They need to be sold above and beyond any call of duty.
Shorten risks our future to please the CFMEU
Fact check: Does the China Free Trade Agreement threaten Australian jobs?
The claim: Unions say the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement "allows Chinese companies to bring in their own workforce for projects over $150 million and removes the requirement that jobs be offered to local workers first".
The verdict: The agreement allows the Immigration Department to decide that jobs should be offered to local workers before it issues visas to overseas workers, but it does not require this to happen. The ACTU's claim checks out.
CEOs Call for Wage Increases for Workers! What’s the Catch?
Sarah Hanson-Young threatens planet with her frequent-flyer travel
Link Bolt's Troll Peter BH and Chris Kenny from the News Corp Hive
Spying on and "sliming" Hanson- Young is the sole purpose on Bolt's blog of misrepresented and distorted fact. Hanson- Young unlike Bronwyn Bishop didn't fly to Europe with her entourage to complete a personal job application and attend an interview in order to upgrade her career. Obviously Bolt feels Hanson- Young's flights to detention centers like Nauru were the equivalent to Bishop's 50km helicopter flight to Geelong for a Lib Fund Raiser.
When Labour is able to be imported into Australia without first being offered to Australians is not racist. When that labour is entitled to put downward pressure on the Australian Labour market then the playing field is no longer equal. It is a response to circumstances where state owned multi- nationals can freely cross our border, bring whatever they want to maximise theirs and a developers profit but lock out Australian Labour. That labour was not so long ago regarded as scab. Wait until these multinationals begin to exploit cheap professional labour. How will Australia's professional associations react to their loss of power. Their is no job in this country today that can't be outsourced for a cheaper price. However while free movement of labour is being offered it's not on a level playing field.
Refusal to examine whether she broke any laws by chartering helicopter to party fundraiser is under investigation.
Labor isn’t serious about our borders - unless unions are threatened
Link News Corp Paywall.
"A badly worded press release" Does Andrew Bolt for one second believe that senior members in fact Peter Dutton himself didn't sign off on was to be a show pony event for Abbott. The deployment and live performance on the streets of Melbourne by the black SS brigade. Does he expect us to believe that this was a single person PR error by one member of Peter Dutton's department and signed off by the second in charge of the ABF. Are we to believe no thinking had gone into this action. If that's the case the whole department needs shutting down immediately for total mismanagement.
Bolt's trying to deflect, the issue and turn it into something else. People profiling was about to take place in the center of Melbourne. A stop and question program was about to be launched. A program generally only seen in the most totalitarian of states. Aprogram so un-Australian it needs to be kept out of the country.
Bolt's deflection simply objects to the right of complaint that it is in fact representative. That complaint and non compliance to this are you a jew SS move disregards the need for Border Protection. How imbecilic and irrational is that? "Oh the opposition is being too hard" Let's take the focus off what the government intended and make them the victims here of the rabble.
Apparantly ABF has the the authority of police. They could have arrested tourists as if that wouldn't have made it to the front pages of the International Press. "Welcome to Australia" Australians could have been stopped and questioned and held for having been profiled. Bolt sees that as ok but the complaints outrageous.
"Average citizens are not normally free on a Friday morning to rally within an hour or two, and are not normall so inconsiderate as to deliberately block traffic and scream abuse."
According to Bolt our profiler those doing the complaing aren't average citizens. I'm 70 retired paid taxes far more in value than Andrew Bolt but am not average because I don't work. Apparently our city center full of people on any day of the week is occupied by non average Australians and that's how we should see them, as suspicious and possible insurgents.
As I've said if your not part of the extreme fringe cheering Abbott your against him. That 2% forever demand 50 % attention and they scream when the don't get it. Bolt's got the foghorn
Abuse of privacy rights as worse than anything George Orwell imagined in his dystopian novel “1984.”
"Unfortunately the press release was very, very badly worded but no one had been, no one ever will be, randomly stopped in the street for some kind of visa check," he said." Tony Abbott
"Shit happens" according to Abbott He has no idea how but it's not his or his executives fault. Whose fault is it?" We don't know because we aren't running the country"Bolt complains that the ABF isn’t given the respect due to them. Straight from Fox
UNHCR Asylum Trends 2014
Filling up: petrol in the car, ice in the brain
Link News Corp Paywall
Bolt's society is fraying at the edges while Melbourne remains the most livable city that's what Andrew Bolt's right wing mind thinks of his home town.. That says a lot about Andrew Bolt. Yesterday we were about to have a war on visas the ABF were to be in Melbourne's CBD policing our legitimacy to be here. Push back from just about everybody questioned the sanity of this SS action signed off by Peter Dutton ex policeman himself. You have never seen a quicker back down by the Abbott government in our life.
We need to expand the war on drugs like we need a hole in the head. This war on inanimate objects is largely a war on the working class. Billions of dollars of drugs we are told and being traded by those that can least afford them. That makes no sense whatsoever in any form of business model it doesn't compute. It does explain a war on the working class and their ever growing incarceration for non violent and petty crime. Do we ever see the same energy and police scrutiny devoted to Toorak, Malvern and Brighton? Do we ever hear of police raids on private schools Scotch,Xavier and Melbourne Grammer or businesses such as the Public Service where upper and middle class drug users congregate, never.
Logic dictates that's where the money is that's where the money is for all of sociteies recreational use. That's where the profits lie for an industry motivated no determined to shift this inanimate item. Yet all policing and focus is away from that demographic of users and all the myths created about the drugs and their use revolve about those least able to afford them. Kids are incarcerated and driven into a cycle of petty crime which in the long term becomes their career path. Are we just going to create more prisons or jobs?
One things certain if Bolt's kids are 18 + they have partaken of illegal substances at sometime and daddy Bolt hasn't a clue what's going on. Maybe he deserves to find out. 
The ABC hands the microphone to any passing Abbott hater
Link Andrew Bolt
Why is Andrew Bolt applauding and magnifying the the media statements of Bob Hawke who doesn't represent anyone and is no longer PM. He's no longer in Parliament like Windsor. However Bolt find what he has to say extremely important and quotes him. He doesn't mention he heard it on the ABC.
Anybody and I mean anybody not cheering Abbott or is silent on Abbott or questions his motives and asks why is according to Bolt an Abbott hater. You literally need to be so behind Abbott your mounting him before Bolt accepts your not a member of the left. How extreme and out of contraol is that? Bolt represents 2% of the country the mad psychotic and paranoid right who demand 50% of the time on our public broadcaster to be balanced. How out of control and insane is that?
Lambie, Lazarus and Muir protect the corrupt and the lawless
Link News Corp Paywall
Again a long blog that's totally irrelevant and does nothing to help Dyson Heydon's cause. The length of time it has taken to make an otherwise simple decision on a point of law suggests Dyson Heydon will remove himself from this Royal Commission and so he should. The reality might be that they are trying to find a replacement for him rather than simply leave a vacuum. What other reason could the delay be about? Abbott's opinions are quite clear. Is he trying to influence the decision by speaking publicly? You bet he is!!
As usual Andrew Bolt is simply presenting an irrelevant sideshow of events rather than the case at hand on which Dyson Heydon needs to make a decision alone and assisted publicly by nobody else. The longer Bolt's blogs are the greater the irrelevant BS you can rely he'll present.
Clinton out of excuses
Link Powerline Right wing Theater of the absurd
Professional opinionator Andrew Bolt runs his opinionless blog as a puppet. His piece here was written for the US National Review which is "America's most widely read and influential magazine and web site for conservative news, commentary, and opinion."
Bolts paid contribution to this whole blog is "How could anyone so reckless, so careless and so deceitful be President of the United States?" I wish I was so financially lucky and that's all I had to do for a living.
Is News Corp really getting value for money? Bolt does nothing for them however News Corp does a lot for him. News Corp is the automatic voice of the right and it's opinions might well be written by a computer. Bolt simply attached his name to this conservative voice. However not to appear too obvious he often uses the likes of Powerline,National Review and Breitbart to distort facts for the neocon media. There's never two sides to his posts. Here I've submitted some opinions that have outed the true purpose of Andrew Bolt's media puppet master.
Wash. Post's David Ignatius Explains The "Scandal" Missing From Clinton's Email Use
Fox Guest Recycles Debunked Clinton Email Myths To Call For Criminal InvestigationState Dept. Spokesman Tells CNN: Hillary Clinton "Was Not Violating Policy"With Personal Email
\
Fox News Sunday Allows Bush Adviser To Baselessly Claim Hillary Clinton Is Subject Of The FBI's Email Investigation
Fox's Krauthammer Falsely Claims Emails Containing "Top Secret" Information Were Sent By Hillary Clinton
Bolt's applauding the actions of the Republicans trying to have Hilary Clinton step down from the Presidential race while condemning the ALP and Unions trying to have Dyson Heydon step down.
No comments:
Post a Comment