Friday, 7 August 2015

Andrew Bolt's Blog,7/8/15; Schadenfreude Bolt's favorite activity he does it with Refugees, Australian Cricket, and Tony Burke a fun un-Australian day; Waleed Aly Bolt takes a shot and misses his target completely; What a Burke Bolt is; Climate and Bolt's blind advocacy; When a government is blind to the law what's left? can it committ murder in it's intrests?

 

 

 

 

Why does Abbott support this man. Why does Bolt declare him a leading voice? He has always left blood in his wake. 

Bjørn Lomborg: Climate Change Asylum Seeker

 

Trump flops

Fox News Opinion is Andrew Bolt's Opinion both are Rupert Murdoch's opinion. Therefore "Trump Flops " Trump declared he wasn't necessrily running as a Republican all the way if he doesn't win the nomination. He has said if he doesn't get the Republican nomination he doesn't count out running as an Independant.

Apparently Trump is leading at the moment and was declared winner on this first debate. Bolt doesn't seem to know what occurred. He's just following his side which makes him dangerous as a "media person" if you expect trustworthy information.

" in contrast to the impressive Ted Cruz, who seemed the most authoritative, albeit at times perhaps too hardline on moral issues for uncommitted voters."

"
This is a threat to split the Republican vote and get Hillary elected if he’s not given the Repubican prize."

Since when have conservatives not been ruthless when playing politics? Nixon, Bush and cronies etc etc. So much so Tony Abbott and his advisers have taken very close notice of their policies and styles. Murdoch is a Republican through and through.

I thought I was finished. So how can I be such a threat?

Bolt was going to let all  this screaming go. It goes to show he just can't his ego always gets in the way. Bolt picks at sores rather than issues. he attacks people regularly to avoid the issues. He'll take the word of ISIS as Gospel but is prepared to disparage anything for example that  Virginia Trioli has to say or anyone who disagrees with him. If that's the case I believe Child Protection ought to pay his family  a visit because if he browbeats his kids as he does others  there might be a case for domestic violence intervention that needs attending. Because Andrew Bolt might be quite vicious beyond just his job.

" angry criticism upon this man, a campaign run in some of the best-selling newspapers and most-read blogs in the country. And guess what? It’s worked."

I believe it's worked because it delivers us the man of extreme the News Corp tool that makes him a dangerous man.

"  But what is most surprising is that commentators of the Left persist in portraying me as this colossus - this Sauran commanding countless legions of Australian orcs - when many have simultaneously assured their audience for years that my power is broken, in decline, fading fast." Bolt

The danger has never been Bolt. The danger has always been News Corp and Bolt's position in it. However when he communicates like this it's little wonder people see the reduced respect of others if there was any in the first place.

 
"What’s happening? Is this like the Left’s continual predictions of a global warming hell that never arrives? Or is it deliberately promoting a falsehood - portraying me, this broken wreck of a journalist, sobbing for his long-lost audience,"

and 

" It’s not just vanity that has made me wonder whether the repeated assurances that I’m finished are to be believed, since I do have a family to feed, after all."

Bolt surely has a better relationship with his family than what one assumes given his public persona. But then again he did say he had to take "them" on holiday. Which leads one to believe there aren't too many "we"s in this mans life Including professional ones.

No don't  worry Andrew Bolt you remain as dangerous as you ever were but not because your Andrew Bolt but because News Corp allows your madness not your wisdom.

 

 

 

Closing down Australia to please the Greens and a skink

Link News Corp Paywall

" We don’t have much of a future if such a project can be stalled over a technicality involving a skink and a snake:"

When Winston Churchill was asked "why are we still funding the arts instead of the war effort" his reply was "what else are we fighting for". Andrew Bolt the Rational Humanist quite happily says profit. If species have to die for human profit so be it. Some estimates of a 60% species loss should climate change and man made warming not be reversed is trite argument fro Bolt given the loss of profit that would entail. So we clearly know Bolt logic is future profits first.

Abbott " courts can be used to “sabotage” worthy projects," The courts aren't there to judge the worthiness of projects they are there to ensure their legal or not. Any suggestion of "sabotage" is a statement suggesting they are non independant decisions. That's coming  from a leader that's disparaged  many of Australia's major institutions. the Courts, ABC, HRC etc How dangerous is that?

" Should governments perhaps scrap a hospital or school for every project that greens block, denying us the money to pay for them?"

If the planning that went into them in first instance was done incorrectly and illegally yes. Should illegal activities be allowed to go on just because governments have given them the nod should murder be over looked because it suited the government? What principle are we operating on here none only sides it would appear ?

 

 

 

Even more Labor pain for no climate gain

Link News Corp Paywall and Bolt's Troll Peter of BH

You can't comment on a paywalled blog.

 Bolt does simply repeat scientific facts that are not true such as the 18 year hiatus which 97% of Climatologists reject. The fact that it is completely wrong Bolt simply ignores.

 Moving away from any scientific rationality Bolt says

 " And the ultimate obscenity? All this spending will actually make no difference to the temperature of our atmosphere," Bolt

Which also runs counter to the consensus of not only most science but most sovereign states as well. So what Bolt has once again done here he has jumped further to the right and away from Abbott and joined Ted Cruz the US Republican he favors for president. It appears he's given Lomborg the flick but has he? If Bolt takes the extreme position even right of Abbott. Maybe he'll hope Abbott will look more moderate Lomborgish in fact. Will Bolt become Australia's leading denier?

 "This is just politicians pretending to fix something politicians are pretending is a problem." 

The economics spouted here can't be verified as the link is blocked the corporate notion of "free speech"

 

 

Say no to save yourselves from such holy terrors

Link The Age Link to a News Corp Paywall Hysteria in video

Bolt claims to be a Rational Humanist his extreme hysteria says otherwise. Can he count the journalists that support his form media on one hand?

Bolt continues on his merry way to ignore what's being said and reveals he doesn't know the difference between reporting, commentary and something even more extreme. ISIS couldn't do better than Bolt.

" The Age continues the witch-hunting and vilification:" Sorry Bolt The Age is reporting an event as it's occurring providing information something you don't do

Bolt the self declared shining knight  who claims he's a victim lives in a world of his own fantasy. He has never spoken to or even been thanked by his damsel in distress who on all reports has a better relationship with Adam Goodes than Andrew Bolt.

He's the dickhead that drags little old ladies across roads kicking and screaming when they don't want to even cross.
" No good deeds can be held to your credit. Not even a 13 year old girl is safe from a public monstering by journalists, none saints themselves but now inflamed with their holy sense of self-righteousness."Bolt

What we have here is a Reclaim Australia and One Nation Ad. Will that 13 year old ever say anything to her white knight?

 

 

 

 

Yes, but back to Bishop… The shameless Age

Link None Troll Josh

Throwing fuel on a dead fire that even the LNP don't want to reignite. Nobody is calling for Bishop's resignation.Another day, another expenses scandal

 

 

Waleed Aly vs Waleed Aly: recognition is meant to divide us and make us “types”

Link none pure unsourced Bolt

" The “recognition” campaign is based from the very start on a wish to divide us permanently on the grounds of race. To turn “we” into “them” and “us”, based on racial qualifications."

There's no metaphor of one hand, five fingers every finger different for Bolt is there. No nuanced notion of a pluralist multicultural democracy here. What  we do have however is the notion of a fully integrated one party fully assimilated authoritarian society that is always on the hunt for "difference".  Difference is deviance. His image of individuality is strictly controlled.

What Bolt's railing about is not Walled Aly's commentry in todays Age Indigenous backdown further isolates Abbott 

Which simply asks who is Abbott as a leader and if in fact he's leading today and on what issues? Bolt has either no clue to what Aly has said or is just deflecting the core issue away from Abbott.

" The polling is clear. Even Coalition voters love renewable energy and trust the ABC. And if your approach to Indigenous affairs offends the very Indigenous voice who effectively wrote your pre-election policies, there is scarcely anyone left in Indigenous Australia on whose behalf you are governing."Waleed Aly

Bolt doesn't even begin to address Aly's article which suggests the rejection by Abbott of even a discussion  by Aborigines to arrive at a consensus of what recognition might look like is  a rejection of recognition itself.  It simply disallows them any  involvement. It's  the same old same old that's gone on for 220 years.

Aly's article is about Tony Abbott and how this exemplifies his leadership style and how it's alienating Abbott from his own party and even it's supporter base.  Aly refers to the fact that Abbott's done much the same with Renewable Energy and the ABC Bolt's rant is about screaming about something that's not even central to Aly's commentary Tony Abbott.

Is Bolt so desperate to protect Abbott he needs to deflect the discussion to his pet topic that tells us racism doesn't exist. We are all individuals and need to realise our selves as such. Unless of course you take a historical look at how decisions were arrived at and by whom in this country. Then the notion of we individuality disappears.

Given Bolt provides no link to Aly's "article" it's bullshit and just a deflection to take attention away from Abbott's continuing incompetence.If black lives matter in Australia, it’s time we owned up to our history

 

 

Burke says he shouldn’t have claimed it, but won’t pay it back

Link ABC

Andrew Bolt would be hard pressed arguing that Tony Burke is the exception amongst politicians. Why isn't he calling for the sacking of the Bishop MP the once Speaker of the House ? Nobody wants the axe to fall on Burke Abbott, Hockey and Pyne certainly don't. So three blogs in a row we have this Medieval Sinner Andrew Bolt dwelling with enjoyment on his dirty little thoughts. Gloating in Schadenfreude. Boring isn't it.

 

 

 

This team does not seem happy

Why does Andrew Bolt sound so pleased with this loss? Schadenfreude" is pleasure derived from the misfortunes of others" Bolt loves a Roman Holiday watching the Christians being fed to the lions. "morose delectation" is another term for Bolt's self indulgence "The habit of dwelling with enjoyment on evil thoughts" "the appeal of sadism is morose delectation."

 Gloating over the deaths of desperate refugees and the loss suffered by our cricket team doesn't seem too different to Andrew Bolt they both give him pleasure. Could ever imagine that the bookies had got to the Aussie team?

 

 

The Camp of the Saints, now for real

Link Powerline USA's Conservative Ezine quotes WSJ News Corps paper

When "a brilliantly prophetic novel on the invasion of Europe."becomes the keystone for Bolt's explanation of the linked human social and economic tragedy occurring in Europe, the Middle East and Nth Africa today. We know reality has been abandoned for imagination and fantasy. Why  is fantasy being applied? Simply because it can be when Andrew Bolt is given the News Corp platform from which to broadcast  the Powerline and WSJ smoke screen that the invasion of Iraq and Republican involvement had nothing to do with what's occurring now. Which as far as information or news are concerned is a meaningless propaganda blitzkrieg .

 Powerline for one is the opposite of News-zine It's a Republican PR flier. Bolt's blog is purely an ideological platform a cry for Fortress Australia and the establishment of a medieval walled city to be applied to  us to prevent  immigration and in particular multiculturalism from spreading.  Fuck Asia let's raise the British flag and reestablish the fortress Isle and turn our economy and democracy over to  the mega-multinationals who as long as they profit will take care of us. They are already doing that aren't they taking care of us.

No comments: