Andrew Bolt's Blog,2/10/15; Oregon shooters profile matches Andrew Bolt's;Advice for Abbott; News Corpse when truth is too reveloutionary; Roping the Pope; Bolt believes in a war of names; Turnbull listens to us not just them; Bolt the escalator has changed Tony is no longer here;

What Bolt omits to say Netanyahu only represents the extreme right of Israeli opinion and he stifles any opposition to the single view that the nuclear deal with Iran is bad. Netanyahu in doing this has not only put a crack in his intelligence service but in his biggest ally American Jewery.
" There are those in the Israeli Intelligence Corps, including those in the research division dealing with Iran, who have a very positive view of the nuclear agreement. Their views, at variance with the totally negative stance taken by Netanyahu and Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon, have bubbled up to the level of Halevy, Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot and others, but there too they have been swallowed up as if they had never existed. Although this is not usually the case in the Intelligence Corps, as opposed to that regarding state secrets, these views are being concealed from the public. Where is the oversight department that is supposed to present contrarian views to the accepted wisdom?
The damage that has resulted to Israel and its ally, American Jewry, is there for all to see. But this is not the case when it comes to unprecedented openness with which raw intelligence materials gathered exclusively by the United States, whether from space or air or land or sea, is offered to Israel on the condition that it refrain from acting independently against the entire world.
Netanyahu is depriving Israel of this intelligence capacity. Even more serious, in the process, he and Ya’alon are transforming the Jewish state, as one senior U.S. military official told his Israeli intelligence colleague, from a friendly force into an enemy that requires intelligence monitoring of its own movements and decision making.
Netanyahu, who is afraid of the publication of intelligence assessments that contradict his own, wants to prevent the public and the U.S. Congress from seeing the cracks in the false facade of a unified Israeli front that opposes the agreement with Iran. Military officers who cooperate with this approach are in breach of their national duty."
Amir Oren
read more: http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.670504
Link Ninenews.com.au , News Corpse Daily Telegraph,
Straight from the Disney Land News, News Corpse's Daily Telegraph and Bevis Tim Blair is the report of the death by shooting of two men outside Paramatta Police Station. Without any reason given one shooter was 'suspected' of Middle Eastern appearance only in News Corpse reports. There are no details of what that even might mean other than he was dressed in black. In other words in the 1950's he may have been said to have looked like a dago. Blair is setting up the situation so Andrew Bolt can shoot his mouth off yet again and to generalize about the negative influence that Muslim migration has had on the country.
" The shooter, believed to be of Middle Eastern appearance and dressed
in black, launched an attack from the street, peppering the front of
the building with bullets."
Since when does Bolt justify making unverified accusations? Always!! As far as he's concerned he calls himself but isn't a journalist. Bolt loves to build the suspense and accusation by innuendo but he protects himself at the very last with get out clause generally goes like this one found here.
" The ABC understands the incident is not terror related." Andrew Bolt
Why is it Bolt spends so much of his time getting the news off the ABC? Because it's the most reliable source of information. Why does he criticize it so much? Because it's the most reliable source of information.
Link Gatestone Institute The Institute for Policy Studies , The Nation, the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the Center for American Progress have categorized Nina Rosenwald and the Gatestone Institute as anti-Muslim.
Germany is expected to take 800,000 + refugees and Bolt focuses on 'dozens' of brawls. The number seems insignificant given the number of arrivals and the difficulties they have faced. However Germany must be a remarkable country if the number of brawls that existed before the arrival of refugees numbers less than dozens. Brawls are part and parcel of every day life in Australia they aren't peculiar to refugees whether in detention centers or in the community. Is Bolt actually suggesting the German police are not able to do their jobs? Is he wanting to do an Abbott and send Australian police over to train them? To assist as we did in the Ukraine when Abbott showed himself to be a world leader volunteering to be an honorary member of NATO.No Bolt is just making a conservative fool of himself. Why hasn't this crime wave been reported in MSM. It's seems to be selective reporting for a very selective audience and a selective purpose. I have no doubt problems will occur and Bolt will always tell us but he will be very careful to omit any good news.
" Another US shooting - 10 people dead - and it has a religious factor: " Bolt
"
Christianity is fast catching up to Judaism as the most persecuted faith." Bolt
What do we really know. Can any generalizations be drawn from the facts? None that Andrew Bolt would like to draw that's for sure. He is according to his profile a Conservative Republican who is non religious but spiritual. His profile actually mirrors Andrew Bolt's

Bolt is gravely disappointed and will throw this one into the bin without further comment. He will find he has to do the same with the shooting in Paramatta.

The man of never ending broken promises.

Link News Corpse the Telegraph Tim Bevis Blair
Bevis and Butthead , Blair and Bolt, both prefer Captain's Call leadership in preference to any collegiate approach to policy. Traditionalists they prefer Abbott's non negotiable combative style that lead to one of the most ineffective legislation passing governments since Federation. Abbott's confrontational government had no concern for leading this country via legislation but only trying to insure that the fading hope of re-election wasn't realized by accentuating the differences in ideologies and playing political games. It blew up in their face both in the polls and the party.
What we are seeing is the Rupert Murdoch sycophants doing their masters bidding tearing at Turnbull in order to have him bring on an early election. We can expect this to continue here on in. What's amusing is the obvious confusion it's caused in News Corpse between the journalists and the talking heads who see no value in revealing the truth because it's too revolutionary.The revolutionary act of telling the truth
Link The ABC, AFR IPA head John Roskam
Idiocy becomes Andrew Bolt and it borders on psychosis describing events which have no basis in fact
" Offence takers are killing free speech. They are also making Christianity a crime"
Troy Newman actually belonged to a group who were convicted of bombing an abortion clinic a violent act for which their second in charge was jailed. Troy Newman tried to hide his connections with the said group so his request for a visa was denied because it was in fact false.
Zacky Mullah was jailed for only a threat of violence and has shown remorse yet Bolt wants him silenced and if possible his citizenship rescinded. There is no equality of justice in Bolt or any principles when Bolt complains neither is it arbitrary. It's all about the side.
"Newman has publicly and repeatedly opposed violence, and his offending comments come from a book he wrote 15 years ago," Bolt.
I Repeat:
Newman's co author was jailed and was second in command of the group Newman was a part of for setting off a bomb. Zacky Mullah paid and served his time in jail for a threat where no violence occurred 12 years ago. Newman tried to hide the fact in order to get a visa. Zacky stood up and said sorry who does Bolt want to hang
Secondly Bolt the advocate of 'free speech' denies the right of complaint or the arena in which that speech may take place particularly when at this point no right has in fact been denied. It's about The Arch Bishop of Tas and a booklet he published bein challenged in law. Of course Bolt is now challenging the law as a suitable judge in fear of the Arch Bishop losing. So what we have is a hypothetical. If your confused you should be because nobody's freedom has been denied. However all our laws that challenge Bolt are deemed bad simply because they challenge Bolt. Reminds us when 10 NSW Liberals were forced to resign for corrupt donation practises. Abbott's claim they were innocent and were only convicted because of a bad law. You do have to laugh we could say the same about all corporate fraud convictions.
Hypocricy has run amok
"But I do sense the real danger here: of authoritarians criminalising the
speech that challenges them, and denying the right of the rest of us to
decide for ourselves whom to hear and what to think."Bolt
Link Paywall to Murdoch's Australian
"Malcolm Turnbull will seek to recast the government’s relationship
with Muslims through more co-operative and inclusive policies after
warnings from security agencies that relations with the Islamic
community have sunk to their lowest ebb."
Australia is a united country. War is not just an exercise in aggressive and divisive name calling at home purely for political advantage. Bolt admonishes it if it's applied to the Jews because of the actions of Israel but seems to accept it when applied to Muslims because of the actions of ISIS. The difference domestic politics and polling. Bolt hates to have any of his weapons removed or weakened.
So upset Bolt simply becomes unhinged so much so he begins to babble "This is all based on the notion that so many leaders around the world have toyed with, only to be defeated by experience." No examples or which leaders given. Who is Bolt talking about? He does however attempt to convince us that the enemy is here among us and needs to be addressed urgently and in blanket terms across the board fingers pointing. Simply mosques, and any Muslim gathering places need to be watched and watched aggressively. If he had his way interned. The Left , Indigenous, and Warmists all need to be called out as well as far as Bolt is concerned as they are also the enemy of the state Abbott's state. But even Bolt knows there are limits.
Yes Obama used the term 'death cult' back in Feb, and Cameron did in Jan and Abbott at every opportunity never stopped. It was more than an exercise in stereotyping the enemy. However even Abbott started calling them Daesh as they were known in the Middle East and stopped using the English created terms that ISIS preferred to be known by. Muslims around the world saw them as 'non believers of true Islam' extremists and not some satanic 'death cult'. They knew them for their politics and not just bogey men.
However for Bolt that's never been sufficient as he is anti- Islam the faith itself . Like always he turns to cultural practises to condemn the faith. Practises not representative of all 56 nations who are Muslim. not even practices of the majority He never refers to the good in the Islamic universe but only refers to the good in his Judeo Christian world, never the bad. The primary thing we as a nation all have in common is we are humans, multicultural and secular. We happen to live in Australia. Bolt mouths this fact only when it suits him such as talking of our constitution but he never applies it when necessary. Rather he's always highlighting the differences from him. ISIS are revolutionary rebels who we don't support any longer but we once did in Syria but not Iraq. They have hijacked a faith simply because faith plays a dominant role in the lives of people in their region. However their underlying reason for war is political and it's in their advantage to create trouble wherever they can. However their primary objective remains within their region.
Bolt never talks of the tyranny of the Middle East inherited From The British and French Colonial rule. How they installed minority governments to rule in their favour. When that favour no longer suited their interests how they were involved in supporting their opposition to over throw their once established governments who began to seek Russian support.It’s Been 50 Years Since the Biggest US-Backed Genocide You’ve Never Heard Of
Link SMH
" all sides hailed the prospect of a new era of consensus and co-operation in Canberra." What in the meaning of 'all sides' is it that Andrew Bolt doesn't understand? It means everyone is in agreement.
"Malcolm Turnbull’s first big economic move is to slug the “wealthy” for even more taxes?" Bolt's apparent statement of fact turns out to be only a question. It seems he just doesn't know. So it seems he's actually making things up.
However his lack of knowledge has never prevented him showing even more ignorance with a further barrage of statements that culminate in.
"What a genius. Heads a Liberal government that lifts taxes yet again."
'When all sides have come to an agreement'. Isn't that the best outcome no matter if one person or a small minority who can afford a twinge of pain are left out in the cold for the betterment of the country. Isn't that the best outcome and pain minimized austerity? Bolt should be celebrating shouldn't he. Instead he's being a scrot.
"The Turnbull government has reached in-principle agreement with unions,
employers and welfare organisations to reduce a raft of concessional
taxation arrangements that benefit the rich, as all sides hailed the
prospect of a new era of consensus and co-operation in Canberra."
Why is Bolt saying the opposite that the agreements are hurting the rich? Because it suits him.Turnbull makes tax breakthrough
Link The SMH
Weathercock Bolt changes his mind at every turn. Having joined Tony Abbott calling for the escalation of war in the Middle East the Hawk has suddenly become a Dove. Why is that? It's simply a game of Simon Says if the US Conservative Republicans see this as an opportunity to criticize Obama then 'just do it'. If it's a chance to raise Lazarus Abbott from the grave then 'just do it'. If it's a dig at Turnbull then 'just do it'
"I guarantee Kerry has not got any Australian commitment to “dramatically
accelerate” our efforts in Syria. We only have six fighters in the
region, for heaven’s sake. We’re in no position to accelerate anything."
Is Bolt saying that Tony Abbott never talked of escalating the war. That the coalition didn't declare the USA leaders in this exercise? If he is saying that then he needs to go back and re-examine the record of facts. Abbott always talked of the possibility of a greater response against IS. In fact he asked for a greater role as his stock at home was fading fast.
"Our new defence minister barely knows what to say in response to this astonishing claim:"Bolt
This barely is a satisfying response for Bolt however it is more than we ever got from the Abbott government who generally said we can't say anything as it's an 'operational matter'
Is little Andrew Bolt in a postured panic and now wetting himself? "It really feels like the end of days for the West." It's amazing the games this man child plays.
No comments:
Post a Comment