Andrew Bolt's Blog,28/10/16. Why the hell should Triggs get on with Brandis; Snouts in the trough and their size; Why should Bolt's kids be subsidized as much as I hate to say it they are our future too; Imagine a society of Bolt's demands for acknowledging all past errors?
Bolt is amazing basically this is a post that links to Bolt's post of yesterday condemning Gillian Triggs to his "list" of his previous posts . Bolt loves lists and is somewhat obsessive about collecting things to put in them. Items selectively chosen that often have no connection other than they in his list. It is a linked post a chain post if you will linked to his columns, radio TV editorials and books. A gram of gold they say can be stretched to the moon and it's still a gram of gold. Bolt stretches a post much the same way and it's still a single thought bubble. It's why his lecturers at Adelaide Uni waved him goodbye so quickly.
Bolt's work ethic is reflected in his lazy Susan of ideas. In this case a single idea that goes around more times than a revolving door and Gillian Triggs is the brunt. Who pray tell in either the Liberal or Labor Party or those among the public service get on with George Brandis? His profession's elected representatives all highly regarded lawyers one and all are crying out for him to leave why? He is an embarrassment to the profession. Having given Brandis a break after break after break his incompetence just keeps floating to the surface time after time after time again. Even the Supreme Court have declared him to be wrong and all Bolt can say is "give him a break". As for Gillian Triggs cream also rises and Australians one and all are grateful for her reminding us that we too can be better than this George Brandis just happens to do it in a different way. The notion of two people getting on is dependent on being next to each other you couldn't envisage two more polar opposites than Brandis and Triggs.
Poochgate Minister in more strife
Who was punished the hardest who got the most
Bolt's a piece of work isn't he. He snaps like a bear trap when a Labor minister is caught with his snout in the trough but was just an over stretched rubber band when Abbott's front bench was caught out ripping the country off. Tony Abbott claimed flights to weddings and birthday parties and less than a peep from Bolt. Yet he was happy to see Peter Slipper driven to the the point of suicide over $900 of cab charges. It's just the way Andrew Bolt rolls. It has nothing to do with principle as far as Bolt is concerned it's all to do with the team you back. Do you hear Andrew Bolt up in arms about all politicians and their bad behavior ?
If you actually consider rip offs in the work place and consider if people, we get real value for money for productive labor done Bolt would be the Peter Foster of media . He is exorbitantly over paid for the least amount of productive work done. What value is he to our GDP's bottom line compared with the African or other migrants cleaning the medical waste off our hospital floors? Compared to Waleed Aly he's little more than the Kim Karadashian of Australian media all style no substance. I died laughing at this post.
The pot calling the kettle black work for the dollar is being evaluated here by Andrew Bolt in our society. the top 10% earn their keep simply on interest and rent on capital gained through inheritance. It's why the term the "idle rich" rings true and fits Australian life. The "idle poor" doesn't have the same resonance as Bolt would like it to have does it. It's why he uses other terms because "idle rich "and "idle poor" just don't sit well together. It's why people like Bolt spit out the term "bludgers" it's even worse because he says people love and wallow in unemployment and the enforced Culture of Poverty that accompanies it.
However here Bolt is comparing naming and shaming Australians for expecting benefits or assistance in raising children as if Australians like himself have no interest or need to invest as much as they do in Australia's future. " Thousands of parents claiming government benefits are financially
better off not getting a job, with new figures showing they receive at
least $45,000 a year tax-free, more than the take-home pay of most
Australian workers." Bolt No says Bolt if your unemployed and have kids tough effen luck as if Bolt never recieved any assistance when raising his own direct or indirect.
"The Australian reveals that the top 10 per cent of those on
parenting benefits, about 43,200 people, received at least $45,032 in
2014-15." Bolt
Question Bolt has 3 kids all at private schools. Why should I be subsidizing his kids to the tune of $30,000 ++ Is it simply because his wages are over and above the handout? Bolt regrets that in a non socialist country we are required to invest in children other than our own however he totally overlooks just how much we have invested in his not for education purposes but soley for the networks maintained that make who you know still more important than what you know. Yes Bolt believes in going Dutch hates sharing even when he gets a greater benefit.That is the head space of those who feel they are born to rule even when they are not one of them.
CSIRO and Bureau should apologise for this sc...
Does Bolt demand that we back track and explain the history of genetics in every report made in 2016? Science is a progressive discipline are all scientists required to explain the past errors made? Those errors are continually evaluated in the peer review process. Obviously something Andrew Bolt doesn't understand doesn't want to or doesn't want us to. Does he demand the same of his doctor when he makes a diagnosis. Please explain the historic errors made in the field of medicine before predicting what's wrong with me?
Talk about lists and repetition Bolt continues collecting his list and conflating the CSIRO and Meteorology with Global Climate Science two entirely different endeavors. Not everything the CSIRO does is the same as the Dept of Meteorology and neither necessarily do what is compatible with what's regarded as Global Climate Science. That explains why Bolt's demand for predictions as accurate as Newton's Laws of motion is moronic.
Last week he was praising scientific research in the field of medicine distinguishing it from the empirical and anectotal methods of Homeopathy, Chinese Medicine and Naturopathy which he felt were closer to religious faiths. What he was praising was Scientific Method. Bolt reverses that when it comes to Global Climate Science and declares it a religion despite the e fact that the methodology is the same. Meteorology is pretty good at predicting our short term weather but Bolt seems to suggests it's an example of the failure of the science In other words he hasn't a clue or intentionally confuses the difference. As for the CSIRO he seems to think like subs it's a waste of money we can let others do it and buy it back for half the price. Why should we be leaders in scientific thinking anyway when others can do it for us and we can be utilitarian in what we choose. Bolt somehow has thrown the baby out with the bath water and opted for Christian Science as the end of the spectrum that might serve us best as all truth is not always helpful economically.
No comments:
Post a Comment