Andrew Bolt's Blog, 13/3/18; Where truth is lost and reason and logic are given a back seat; Flipping is Bolt's schoolboy bully debating skill and context avoided at all cost; Corman's lost the right to govern; Bolt Slut Shaming Gillian Triggs on International Women's Day; NRA,Guns and Trump:

When you Finance Minister can only say "your Jealous" when the rich are getting richer what does it say about his government

HOW FIVE ABC STAFF SWALLOWED GLOBAL WARMING BULL

Five ABC presenters and journalists independently interviewed global warming poet Kathy Jetnil-Kijiner and sympathetically repeated her claims that her Marshall Islands were drowning under rising seas. Incredibly, not one of those ABC interviewers bothered to check the facts. My editorial from The Bolt Report.  

12/03/201

Bolt playing three card monte with Climate facts to convince us that Global Climate Science is just fake news and a wacko religion. He has the microphone and unlike Peter Dutton and Tony Abbott not embarrassed to mock Pacific Islanders publicly. Remember Boomgate when Dutton was so embarrassed for being caught out he offered to resign and Abbott the staunch denier couldn't let him because that would make them look the fools Morrison saw they were.

Well here's Bolt quoting Abbott and saying Climate Science is "crap".

If a forest was dying Bolt would say 'crap' because not all the trees would appear dead. If the oceans are rising Bolt would look for the exceptions to argue 'so what'. Not all smokers die of cancer does he promote the idea that the medical research done saying smoking is dangerous is 'crap'? Remember when Bolt spent so much energy telling us the planet was cooling. He stopped doing that. All this media effort for the purpose of convincing us CO2 is harmless and fossil fuels are the planets best source of energy. Well that argument may have had traction some years ago it doesn't any longer and yes the money, finance, and science have moved in an alternative direction. Bolts noise was never a convincing argument because Bolt just talks and Science does look for the truth about our physical world.

 The Truth is the Truth no matter even if nobody believes it. A Lie is a Lie even if everyone believes it. 
 Research shows us lies are quicker to spread via media and last longer than any truth. If the reverse were true Andrew Bolt would be jobless and Trump wouldn't be President. It's what won Tony Abbott an election.
Bolt's promise "step inside my tent"
However Global Science Research has shown us the planet is warming, the oceans are rising and are becoming more acidic and 196 nations have changed their social policies in accordance with these facts. America and Australia haven't however private investment in these countries has and there is a growing divestment of all activities away from dirty energy.

WHITES PERSECUTED, BUT WHO CARES?

Reporter Paul Toohey has documented the shocking number of attacks on white farmers in South Africa. Why are human rights groups so silent?

12/03/2018
Currently, in Australia the Mining Council of Australia has gone to the courts to change the laws on Native Title and Land Rights, Andrew Bolt says nothing. No, he rather takes up the legal battle in South Africa where repatriation of Indigenous Lands illegally taken is threatened to take place.

 Typical Bolt's sensationalist facts presented without any social or historical context make it appear that an invasion is occurring in South Africa of white man's property and land.  That black racism abounds without any response from human rights groups. Flipping is an easy practice and Andrew Bolt practices it religious fervour in an attempt to shift the goalposts of any debate. Men are being attacked by women, Heterosexuals by LGBTIQs and he's doing it here. Land is being stolen, not repatriated according to Bolt and Australia has provided shelter for 200,000 poor white rich South Africans who realized it was time to make a choice stay or leave as it did post WW2 war to poor Germans and Dutch who felt they might be regarded as Hitler sympathizers and be treated unfairly in their own post-war country. There is every reason no-one other than Bolt cares justice is being served and a rebalance of history is taking place. There may be a case of a poor South African farmer found Bolt's poster boy but there is no case for the poor white South Africans refusing to get off stolen land being legally repatriated. Crocodile tears don't breed the sympathy Bolt's crying for. In context, the plight of the farmers will fall on deaf ears
Guess Bolt will soon take up the cause of the poor whites in Port Morseby living behind barbed wire armed to the teeth as well. As for Toohey who works for News Corp well, he's hardly reporting just editorializing as is Bolt. Isn't it strange loads of people believe Bolt has a South African accent maybe it's his ideas and ideological posture that does that.
Below are Bolt's choice of refugees



 

 'Politics of envy' drives tax plan: Cormann

 Labour will target more than 1 million Australian taxpayers who own shares in a $59 billion revenue push, with Finance Minister Mathias Cormann labelling the scheme the 'politics of envy'.

 When your Finance Minister can only say "Your Jealous"  when the rich have been getting unprecedently richer and the opposition wants to redress that issue what does it say about his government? What does it say about the intelligence of his politics?

 

 

WEARING PEARLS FOR THE SWINE

Former Human Rights Commission boss Gillian Triggs blames us for her fashion choices: "We’ve absorbed the values of a male-dominated world, but we’re yet to receive the benefits... I’ve worn the pearl earrings and the snappy jackets. I’ve done everything that was required, but it isn’t breaking the cycle of disempowerment."

40m LINK

Bolt is being just the male Triggs is talking about the "Slut Shamer". The mocker he is representative of the disease of Patriarchy and the inequality that comes with it and of which most women are aware.  Is that why he says he's so shy in public he's actually frightened that women like Triggs and Miranda Devine might just confront him?

"How sweet. She wore the pearls for us, thinking that by wearing them she'd get the walls to fall. That a spooky trust in magic pearls."Bolt
Being a mother's boy has Bolt somehow confused as to what Patriarchy actually means it has just made him a staunch misogynist.
 If Bolt did this in his office or any workplace to any woman he'd be facing harassment charges. I guess it's why he's so cocky he's not. However, he even talks about his wife as if she were some freeloading baggage when he actually gained his social status by marrying her. He certainly didn't achieve it on merit like Triggs. It wasn't so long ago Bolt was faking his standard of education achieved.

TURNBULL DISMISSES HIS 30-POLL TEST

Malcolm Turnbull toppled Tony Abbott on the grounds that he had lost 30 Newspolls in a row. Compare what he said then to what he said last night, having lost 28 himself - with two more losses certain to come. 

1h

Of course, he does the real test is whether the Party retains him. It certainly won't bring Abbott back unless he's their leader in opposition and that's hardly likely either. Time stands still for no man Bolt even for you even though you post photos of your younger self FAKE BOLT FAKE NEWS 
Bolt's arguments over time haven't changed his ploys are minus points when it comes to debating flipping, moving the goal posts, wild generalisations from selective single cases and on it goes, none of his techniques would gain any points in any real debating forum. It's as I say time has moved on but Bolt hasn't 

via Preparations To Do Nothing About Next School Massacre Now In Place, Government Confirms – The Shovel

Andrew Bolt's Blog 17/3/17; Bolt's sour grapes; Andrew Bolt promoting himself without any links to facts; Disparaging Gillian Triggs;

 

 

HOLLAND MOVES RIGHT

The ABC spins the Dutch election result: "Voters in the Netherlands ... have turned their back on the anti-establishment populist candidate Geert Wilders." Really? Check the results.

Just how unconvincing is Bolt? The polls predicted a Hanson landslide the polls predicted a Wilders boil over win. Bolt predicted a huge win for both of them.

The result  Wilders didn't sound as if he won. He didn't  even suggest he'd accomplished what he'd hoped for. The Greens certainly did sound as if they won. The whole of Europe didn't seem to be declaring a Wilders won or that there was a massive swing to the right. Bolt actually sounds like he was a member of the Dutch Socialist Left who lost ground.  There wasn't any partying in the Bolt household.

As for the ABC they provided the feeling as well as the facts of the Dutch election they didn't spin it at all. The reflected the disappointment of the populist right who were poll front runners and performed surprisingly worse than expected. 

TURNBULL'S PLAN COSTS MORE POWER THAN IT ADDS

This claim about Malcolm Turnbull's $2 billion Snowy scheme is misleading: "Turnbull ... said the project will increase power output by 50 per cent."  In fact, using electricity to pump water up hill to make hydro electricity when it falls takes 20 per cent more power than it creates. It is an expensive battery. Wouldn't a generator be more useful?

  If Andrew Bolt proved to be as much an expert on Hyrdro Power as he does to be a predictor of the outcome of the Dutch Election we'd all be going to hell in a hand basket. Here we have Bolt commenting on Hydro Power while promoting his show and disparaging Turnbull at the same time. However Turnbull didn't create the energy crisis in as much as Tony Abbott ignored it for the sake of opposition to Julia Gillard. The crisis was a politically created one. How else can a country of 24mill with more power resources than the rest of the world be incapable of having sufficient energy? We don't get the royalties Norway gets. We squandered the savings made. We don't even collect the  taxes Japan gets for our gas. This isn't Turnbull's creation. We privatized on a promise of cheap power and were lied to. Now we rely on the promises of privateers working in the interests of only some Australians not all Australians and Bolt is talking technology. 

What is even more odd Bolt directs us to a link to Professor Blakers who writes nothing but a positive report on Hydro storage his article makes no mention of the negative effects Bolt's talking about. Is Bolt the expert on power as well as everything that moves. He's certainly silent on the failure of the populist right in Europe.

 The great gas robbery is happening before our eyes. But what can we do about it? - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

 

 

 

 

 

 

GILLIAN TRIGGS AT BOB BROWN EVENT

What else can Gillian Triggs do to discredit the Human Rights Commission she leads? She has misled the Senate, persecuted innocent students, undermined free speech, led biased inquiries and now this: "Triggs ... [is] speaking at a fundraising event for former Greens leader Bob Brown." Resign now.

  "Liberal backbencher Eric Abetz said the event appeared to contravene the Public Service Code of Conduct..." Abetz   Of course Bolt would quote the man who also told us abortions lead to cancer. They are a pigeon pair if ever there is one.If Gillian Triggs even suggested that clean air was preferable to breathe than polluted these two would be on her to resign. Yes Abetz can give Australians medical advice contrary to all scientific research and be praised by Bolt for doing it especially if it meant the disparagement of Triggs.

Andrew Bolt's Blog, 28/10/16. Bolt shows himself to be what he truly is Not an Australian; Why the hell should Triggs get on with Brandis; Snouts in the trough and their size; Why should Bolt's kids be subsidized as much as I hate to say it they are our future too; Imagine a society of Bolt's demands for acknowledging all past errors?

 

 

Who let them in? The Hamzy case

 

 

Bolt's selective list to fit his bigoted narrative. 

" Our immigration program is putting Australians in danger. Today's examples involve a killer, a gang member jailed for manslaughter and a man with two wives. And once again we must ask: who let them in?"Bolt

What was headline news today and what hasn't Bolt stopped for in the rush to talk about his list?

 A 48 year old white Australian by the name of O'Donahue threw petrol over Manmeet Sharma a 29 year old Hindu Brahmin  bus driver and set him alight. He's dead now one might well ask of that dead man "who let him in" if they hadn't he might still be alive. However Manmeet doesn't fit Andrew Bolt's narrative so he makes no mention of him nor does he mention that a taxi driver who saved the lives of the 11 passengers on board that bus was an African. The Project and Waleed Aly certainly made it a center piece of their show. It shows a clear difference in who does and doesn't deserve respect when it comes to our media.

Bolt however had to rush to make his narrative point 
"Can you trust our politicians with our immigration and refugee programs? Can you trust them to bring in 12,000 Syrians and Iraqis without endangering you?"Bolt  My point is why does Pauline Hanson and Andrew Bolt encourage the O'Donahues of Australia to come out from under their rocks? If the colors of the people in this story had been reversed Andrew Bolt would have been the first up in arms calling it a terrorist event. One covered up by the police for saying "it wasn't an act of terror". Today there's nothing just silence.

Why the hell should Brandis get on with Trigg...

 

Bolt is amazing basically this is a post that links to Bolt's post of yesterday condemning Gillian Triggs to his "list" of his previous  posts . Bolt loves lists and is somewhat obsessive about collecting things to put in them. Items selectively chosen that often have no connection other than they in his list. It is a linked post a chain post if you will  linked to his columns, radio TV editorials and books.  A gram of gold they say can be stretched to the moon and it's still a gram of gold.  Bolt stretches a post much the same way and it's still a single thought bubble. It's why his lecturers at Adelaide Uni waved him goodbye so quickly.  Bolt's work ethic is reflected in his lazy Susan of ideas. In this case a single idea that goes around more times than a revolving door and Gillian Triggs is the brunt. Who pray tell in either the Liberal or Labor Party or those among the public service get on with George Brandis? His profession's elected representatives  all highly regarded lawyers one and all are crying out for him to leave why?  He is an embarrassment to the profession. Having given Brandis a break after break after break his incompetence  just keeps floating to the surface time after time after time again. Even the Supreme Court have declared him to be wrong and all Bolt can say is "give him a break". As for Gillian Triggs cream also rises and Australians one and all are grateful for her reminding us that we too can be better than this George Brandis just happens to do it in a different way. The notion of  two people getting on is dependent on being next to each other you couldn't envisage two more polar opposites than Brandis and Triggs. 

Poochgate Minister in more strife

 

Who was punished the hardest who got the most

Bolt's a piece of work isn't he. He snaps like a bear trap when a Labor minister is caught with his snout in the trough but was just an over stretched rubber band when Abbott's front bench was caught out ripping the country off. Tony Abbott claimed flights to weddings and birthday parties and less than a peep from Bolt. Yet  he was happy to see Peter Slipper driven to the the point of  suicide over $900 of cab charges. It's just the way Andrew Bolt rolls. It has nothing to do with principle as far as Bolt is concerned it's all to do with the team you back. Do you hear Andrew Bolt up in arms about all politicians  and their bad behavior ?

If you actually consider rip offs in the work place and consider if people, we get real value for money  for  productive labor done Bolt would be the Peter Foster of media . He is exorbitantly over paid  for the least amount of productive work done. What  value is he to our GDP's bottom line compared with the African or other migrants cleaning the medical waste  off our hospital floors? Compared to Waleed Aly he's little more than the Kim Karadashian of Australian media all style no substance. I died laughing at this post. 

The pot calling the kettle black work for the dollar is being evaluated here by Andrew Bolt in our society. the top 10% earn their keep simply on interest and rent on capital gained through inheritance. It's why the term the  "idle rich" rings  true and fits Australian life. The "idle poor" doesn't have the same resonance as Bolt would like it to have does it. It's why he uses other terms because  "idle rich "and "idle poor" just don't sit well together. It's why people like Bolt spit out the term "bludgers" it's even worse because he says people love and wallow in unemployment and the enforced Culture of Poverty that accompanies it.

 

Handouts should never beat wages

 

However here Bolt is comparing naming and shaming Australians for expecting benefits or assistance in raising children as if Australians like himself have no interest or need to invest as much as they do in Australia's future. " Thousands of parents claiming government benefits are financially better off not getting a job, with new figures showing they ­receive at least $45,000 a year ­tax-free, more than the take-home pay of most Australian workers." Bolt  No says Bolt if your unemployed and have kids tough effen luck as if Bolt never recieved any assistance when raising his own direct or indirect.
"The Australian reveals that the top 10 per cent of those on parenting benefits, about 43,200 people, received at least $45,032 in 2014-15." Bolt 

Question Bolt has 3 kids all at private schools. Why should I be subsidizing his kids to the tune of $30,000 ++ Is it simply because his wages are over and above the handout? Bolt regrets that in a non socialist country we are required to invest in children other than our own however he totally overlooks just how much we have invested in his not for education purposes but soley for the networks maintained that make who you know still more important than what you know. Yes Bolt believes in going Dutch hates sharing even when he gets a greater benefit.That is the head space of those who feel they are born to rule even when they are not one of them.

 

CSIRO and Bureau should apologise for this sc...

 

 

Does Bolt demand that we back track and explain the history of genetics in every report made in 2016? Science is a progressive discipline are all scientists required to explain the past errors made? Those errors are continually evaluated in the peer review process. Obviously something Andrew Bolt doesn't understand doesn't want to or doesn't want us to. Does he demand the same of his doctor when he makes a diagnosis. Please explain the historic errors made in the field of medicine before predicting what's wrong with me?

Talk about lists and repetition Bolt continues collecting his list and conflating the CSIRO and Meteorology with Global Climate  Science  two entirely different endeavors. Not everything  the CSIRO does is the same as the Dept of Meteorology and neither necessarily do what is compatible with what's regarded as Global Climate Science. That explains why Bolt's demand for predictions as accurate as Newton's Laws of motion is  moronic.

Last week he was praising scientific research in the field of medicine distinguishing it from the empirical and anectotal methods of Homeopathy, Chinese Medicine and Naturopathy which he felt were closer to religious faiths. What he was praising was Scientific Method. Bolt reverses that when it comes to  Global Climate Science and declares it a religion despite the e fact that the methodology is the same. Meteorology is pretty good at predicting our short term weather but Bolt seems to suggests it's an example of the failure of the science In other words he hasn't a clue or intentionally confuses the difference. As for the CSIRO he seems to think like subs it's a waste of money we can let others do it and buy it back for half the price. Why should we be leaders in scientific  thinking anyway when others can do it for us and we can be utilitarian in what we choose.  Bolt somehow has thrown the baby out with the bath water and opted for Christian Science as the end of the spectrum that might serve us best as all truth is not always helpful economically.

 

 

Rewriting Turnbull's vacuous waffle

More posts Andrew Bolt simply doesn't get it the Liberal Party isn't the Conservative Party he insists it should be. To insist it is is destroying it. yes the moderates accept the fact that Conservatives exist if they didn't those in the Monkey Pod Room would be out on their ear. Yes Turnbull has bent over backwards to accommodate them and show that the Liberal Party was in fact a broad church something the Abbott faction refuses to do. While the Conservatives have shamed Australia they have made room for the likes of Pauline Hanson and have ensured that the problems the country faces will not be solved because bills won't be passed due to their forced intransigence we don't have a government and even if they win power again we still won't have one.

Andrew Bolt's Blog,28/10/16. Why the hell should Triggs get on with Brandis; Snouts in the trough and their size; Why should Bolt's kids be subsidized as much as I hate to say it they are our future too; Imagine a society of Bolt's demands for acknowledging all past errors?

 

Why the hell should Brandis get on with Trigg...

 

Bolt is amazing basically this is a post that links to Bolt's post of yesterday condemning Gillian Triggs to his "list" of his previous  posts . Bolt loves lists and is somewhat obsessive about collecting things to put in them. Items selectively chosen that often have no connection other than they in his list. It is a linked post a chain post if you will  linked to his columns, radio TV editorials and books.  A gram of gold they say can be stretched to the moon and it's still a gram of gold.  Bolt stretches a post much the same way and it's still a single thought bubble. It's why his lecturers at Adelaide Uni waved him goodbye so quickly.

 Bolt's work ethic is reflected in his lazy Susan of ideas. In this case a single idea that goes around more times than a revolving door and Gillian Triggs is the brunt. Who pray tell in either the Liberal or Labor Party or those among the public service get on with George Brandis? His profession's elected representatives  all highly regarded lawyers one and all are crying out for him to leave why?  He is an embarrassment to the profession. Having given Brandis a break after break after break his incompetence  just keeps floating to the surface time after time after time again. Even the Supreme Court have declared him to be wrong and all Bolt can say is "give him a break". As for Gillian Triggs cream also rises and Australians one and all are grateful for her reminding us that we too can be better than this George Brandis just happens to do it in a different way. The notion of  two people getting on is dependent on being next to each other you couldn't envisage two more polar opposites than Brandis and Triggs.

 

Poochgate Minister in more strife

 

Who was punished the hardest who got the most

Bolt's a piece of work isn't he. He snaps like a bear trap when a Labor minister is caught with his snout in the trough but was just an over stretched rubber band when Abbott's front bench was caught out ripping the country off. Tony Abbott claimed flights to weddings and birthday parties and less than a peep from Bolt. Yet  he was happy to see Peter Slipper driven to the the point of  suicide over $900 of cab charges. It's just the way Andrew Bolt rolls. It has nothing to do with principle as far as Bolt is concerned it's all to do with the team you back. Do you hear Andrew Bolt up in arms about all politicians  and their bad behavior ?

If you actually consider rip offs in the work place and consider if people, we get real value for money  for  productive labor done Bolt would be the Peter Foster of media . He is exorbitantly over paid  for the least amount of productive work done. What  value is he to our GDP's bottom line compared with the African or other migrants cleaning the medical waste  off our hospital floors? Compared to Waleed Aly he's little more than the Kim Karadashian of Australian media all style no substance. I died laughing at this post. 

The pot calling the kettle black work for the dollar is being evaluated here by Andrew Bolt in our society. the top 10% earn their keep simply on interest and rent on capital gained through inheritance. It's why the term the  "idle rich" rings  true and fits Australian life. The "idle poor" doesn't have the same resonance as Bolt would like it to have does it. It's why he uses other terms because  "idle rich "and "idle poor" just don't sit well together. It's why people like Bolt spit out the term "bludgers" it's even worse because he says people love and wallow in unemployment and the enforced Culture of Poverty that accompanies it.

 

Handouts should never beat wages

 

However here Bolt is comparing naming and shaming Australians for expecting benefits or assistance in raising children as if Australians like himself have no interest or need to invest as much as they do in Australia's future. " Thousands of parents claiming government benefits are financially better off not getting a job, with new figures showing they ­receive at least $45,000 a year ­tax-free, more than the take-home pay of most Australian workers." Bolt  No says Bolt if your unemployed and have kids tough effen luck as if Bolt never recieved any assistance when raising his own direct or indirect.
"The Australian reveals that the top 10 per cent of those on parenting benefits, about 43,200 people, received at least $45,032 in 2014-15." Bolt 

Question Bolt has 3 kids all at private schools. Why should I be subsidizing his kids to the tune of $30,000 ++ Is it simply because his wages are over and above the handout? Bolt regrets that in a non socialist country we are required to invest in children other than our own however he totally overlooks just how much we have invested in his not for education purposes but soley for the networks maintained that make who you know still more important than what you know. Yes Bolt believes in going Dutch hates sharing even when he gets a greater benefit.That is the head space of those who feel they are born to rule even when they are not one of them.

 

CSIRO and Bureau should apologise for this sc...

 

 

Does Bolt demand that we back track and explain the history of genetics in every report made in 2016? Science is a progressive discipline are all scientists required to explain the past errors made? Those errors are continually evaluated in the peer review process. Obviously something Andrew Bolt doesn't understand doesn't want to or doesn't want us to. Does he demand the same of his doctor when he makes a diagnosis. Please explain the historic errors made in the field of medicine before predicting what's wrong with me?

Talk about lists and repetition Bolt continues collecting his list and conflating the CSIRO and Meteorology with Global Climate  Science  two entirely different endeavors. Not everything  the CSIRO does is the same as the Dept of Meteorology and neither necessarily do what is compatible with what's regarded as Global Climate Science. That explains why Bolt's demand for predictions as accurate as Newton's Laws of motion is  moronic.

Last week he was praising scientific research in the field of medicine distinguishing it from the empirical and anectotal methods of Homeopathy, Chinese Medicine and Naturopathy which he felt were closer to religious faiths. What he was praising was Scientific Method. Bolt reverses that when it comes to  Global Climate Science and declares it a religion despite the e fact that the methodology is the same. Meteorology is pretty good at predicting our short term weather but Bolt seems to suggests it's an example of the failure of the science In other words he hasn't a clue or intentionally confuses the difference. As for the CSIRO he seems to think like subs it's a waste of money we can let others do it and buy it back for half the price. Why should we be leaders in scientific  thinking anyway when others can do it for us and we can be utilitarian in what we choose.  Bolt somehow has thrown the baby out with the bath water and opted for Christian Science as the end of the spectrum that might serve us best as all truth is not always helpful economically.

Andrew Bolt's Blog, 28/11/15; Nothing new from Bolt on Climate; Thank you Gillian Triggs; Chris Kenny sees Libs as divided but then he said Nauru was a resort ; Bolt wants Gaza in Syria; Nobody mentions Israel's involvement;

 

 

Remember when Australian journalists thought this phrase contemptible?

Maybe because it was used in association with Islam by Abbott who eventually began calling them Daesh. A name they didn't like. It took some time for Abbott to change if I recall. Bolt hasn't.

What's interesting however is Bolt's attack on real journalists as usual go unnamed. Who is going to bother researching what Bolt says given he is the outlander of media not the other journalists. We simply need to assume it's propagandizing for Abbott who could also stand mute in front of cameras for over a minute and becoming the laughing stock of the world for doing it.

 

 

 

 

Machismo, or a word from the wise?

"This debate has become near impossible here because so many Turnbull supporters - in Parliament and in the media - insist on seeing it purely in terms of an Abbott-Turnbull conflict." 

So rather than Abbott-Turnbull conflict of which there is none other than the one Andrew Bolt pursues and invents. Bolt turns to the less than objective Gerard Henderson who spends his energy on an imagined interview with Tony Abbott rather than a real one. Do we need to imagine Henderson dressed as Sales conducting and interview. Imagine him conducting it with Malcolm oh no thankyou.

 
"Oh. So is MacLeod saying it was wrong to send troops to fight Hitler? Tojo’s Japan?" No Andrew Bolt MacLeod is saying nothing of the sort. However Israel has occupied Syria's Golan heights and intends to stay there.

 

Bolt Never mentions the fact that Israel prefers a state of anarchy to s Secular Arab Nation with a fully equipped military backed by the Russians. By far Israels preference has been the conflicting rebel forces. Don't ask me Shari Markson has been busted in Israel for interviewing them and has got herself in hot water. Bolt wouldn't tell you that. Israel and the US have been fighting a proxy war  against Assad for some time and closing a blind eye to others assisting them.

  

Another climate scare debunked. Professor urges calm

As I've always said Bolt continues to use refuted figures to repeat ad nauseum  the fact that there has been no warming for 18 years. Which NOAA confirmed was wrong yet again this year. That  research was wrong and declared wrong  quite some time ago. Bolt never mentions the peer reviews of that data nor the number of times it has been refuted. However what connection has the El Ninos with the prediction that this year is on track to be the hottest on record?

 

 

 

Turnbull pours tea for Gillian Triggs

 "Another bad sign and one that may distress Malcolm Turnbull’s Treasurer, who as Immigration Minister was badly verballed by Triggs. Nor can the Attorney General be too chuffed, after understandably declaring he’d lost confidence in Triggs:"Bolt

Another set of meaningless words saying I wish Abbott was still here. Bolt sounds more like comedian Lou Costello calling for Bud Abbott.  We certainly know that  you'll continue to huff and  puff to try to blow the Liberal Party down. But not because Turnbull had tea with an extrmely admired Australian.

What is a welcoming sign is there is a softening attitude to how we treat the children kept in misery. That goes a hell of a lot further than Chris Kennys ad for Nauru describing it as a Pacific Holiday resort. 

How about  we talk about how we resettled 4 refugees in Cambodia for $55million and after a week or two  one fleeing home to the danger he fled. Or the total cost the total cost of our illegal behavior and it's consequent injury and deaths caused to asylum seekers yet to be processed. Or the processing system that's stalled. Australia is gratefull for Gillian Triggs.

 

 

 

It’s not Turnbull’s left flank that is vulnerable

Chris Kenny the man who turned Nauru into a holiday resort for Asylum seekers like all the News Corp Crew is trying to make  out the Libs are a divided Party. He's arguing Turnbull has cut a path for himself that with the help of Albanese win?  No will allow Abbott to gather the strength to  blindside Malcolm again. Does Kenny sense the public dissatisfaction with Turnbull as he sensed the appreciation Asylum seekers had with their island resort by the sea Nauru? He was quickly put down by his media brothers then and treated as a running joke. He repeats himself here. Does he think for a minute the Libs will change leaders again?

 

 

 

 

First, assume the Muslim can-opener

Since the 1980's the US and Israel had ambitions to get rid of Arab - Secular Nationalism Saddam/Qaddafi/Assad. Carpe Chaos "seize the Chaos" has been a major part of Israeli foreign policy. Israel first- Neocon Adviser to Bush and Cheney David Wurmser promoted that " Arab nationalism in general was unsuitable for the Arab people, given their particularist and tribal tendencies. Therefore, its adoption can only condemn Arab countries to forever “fluctuate between repression and anarchy.” Truth Israel didn't want states with strong secular armies as it's neighbors.

 They actually believed they had a better chance of controlling the fundamentalist and tribal chaos.Yet, even then, the best laid plans of the neocons and Likudniks still completely failed to pan out.

 The anticipated “Jordanian-Israeli-Iraqi-Turkish bloc,” didn't eventuate but what they perceive as an anti-Israel “Shia crescent” including Iran, Iraq, Syria, and (most importantly) Hezbollah in Lebanon. Far from being isolated, Syria seemed to have more friends than ever. Oops.

 So for the sake of Israel, and since at least 2007, Washington, along with its regional allies, has been waging a broad covert proxy war to undermine the “Shia crescent.” It has involved supporting Sunni Islamist mujahideen in Lebanon, Syria, and Iran.since at least 2012 by heavily sponsoring an insurgency led by jihadists including Al Qaeda and ISIS .Israel has also been contributing to the cause of chaos more directly. Like a prizefighter’s “cutman,” the Israeli military has stood in Al Qaeda’s corner, taking in its wounded terrorist “rebels,” patching them up, and then sending them back into Syria to resume fighting.  News Corps Shari Markson  has just got into trouble for speaking to them a secret Israel prefered to keep.

In Syria too, the neocons and Israel have finally seen their longed for chaotic collapse, to the tune of a quarter of a million Syrian deaths and millions more displaced (many fleeing to Europe or drowning en route).As discussed above, Israel has seized on the chaos it has unleashed on its northern neighbor as an excuse for expanding settlements in the Golan Heights.Moreover, whenever that chaos even slightly spills over into Golan, Israel has been seizing that as a pretext for still more war.Syrian soldiers are desperately battling Al Qaeda just north of Golan. Whenever a shell strays into the Heights (almost always exploding harmlessly in some unoccupied field), Israel responds by bombing Syrian military positions, thus effectively serving as Al Qaeda’s air force as well as its combat medic.

In 2013, at the end of his tenure as Israeli ambassador to the US, Michael Oren delivered this parting message through The Jerusalem Post:

“‘The initial message about the Syrian issue was that we always wanted [President] Bashar Assad to go, we always preferred the bad guys who weren’t backed by Iran to the bad guys who were backed by Iran,’ he said.""even if the other ‘bad guys’ were affiliated to al-Qaida."“From Israel’s perspective, if there’s got to be an evil that’s got to prevail, let the Sunni evil prevail.” Oren is here specifically referring to ISIS.

“America’s greatest friend in the Middle East.” 

"Israel would have preferred to have the Levant ruled by stable sock puppets of the West. But failing that, it would much rather be surrounded by an extremist-stricken Muslim maelstrom of mutual massacres than to have in its neighborhood even a single secular-Arab nationalist state with an independent rational leadership, a steady tax base, and a disciplined military."

  And as a recently-released government intelligence document revealed, it has done so knowing full well that it would likely result in the Levant being overrun by America-hating Islamic terrorists. 

 The West has indeed adopted the neocon/Israeli strategy, precipitating the “chaotic collapse” of secular-Arab nationalism in Iraq, Libya, and Syria. But the chaos has not been “contained and managed” as Wurmser anticipated. Neither has it cleared the way for “a more healthy future” as he promised.

Instead it has created exactly what Wurmser said it would prevent: a “chaotic sea” immersing the entire Middle East and “painfully intrud[ing] on the West.” That chaotic sea is even lapping up onto the shores of Europe in the form of the refugee crisis. 

And now that Russia has been drawn into the Syrian war, where its bombers and troops operate at cross purposes with American bombers and proxy fighters, the chaotic sea threatens to become a thermonuclear lake of fire engulfing the whole world."Carpe Chaos" - ISIS, Israel, Iraq, & Syria: It's All Part Of The ...

 

 

 

 

Why these frantic attempts to shut down debates?

What Bolt calls debate is abuse, personal disparagement and the repetitive use of facts which have been proven false. Sweeping generalizations gleaned from singular if not irrelevant events. The issue being Bolt does not debate he simply propagandizes and rarely brings anything new to the table on any issue.

 

 

 

 

Who let their families in, and made us seem too soiled for their loyalty?

When the police don't give figures or state who these sympathizers are what gives Bolt the right to falsely suggest 1) they are immigrants 2) they aren't Australians 3) that we as Australians  can't sympatize with their actions.

Bolt calls for troops on the ground in Syria in order to do that there needs to be some understanding and sympathy for the rebel cause some of whom are deemed on any other day terrorists. The coalition armed terrorists that was and is sympathy in action. Turkey just sympathized with the Turkmen on it's borders deemed terrorists by Russia and took down a Russian plane. You can't have it every which way Bolt Sympathy isn't a crime vilification is. I have a very clear view of the error made allowing a Dutch family migrate here to see the damage their son does to the social fabric and cohesion in this country.

"We need a conservation about the policies, assumptions and moral posturing that led to the importation of this danger, and to the coaching of the essential wickedness"

I agree far more attention rather than just stereotyping needs to be given to the people allowed in because we failed comprehensively  when allowing the Bolt's in. But then we were rewarded with Richard Bolt.

 

 

 

Making Christianity unlawful in Tasmania

  According to Andrew Bolt an indigenous man vilified Jews at a synagogue  yesterday? Bolt had little to say on the matter of theft drunkenness and theft  but simply concentrated on the tribalism and the words that were used. The Jews of Melbourne applaud the necessity of Section 18C  They are not intolerant and say it must be retained. Not a peep was heard from Bolt against that view. Bolt however backed off from comment saying it was too dangerous because  of the assumption the man was  aboriginal.  At no time did Bolt defend the man's right to say what he did. Bolt was certainly not heard supporting the right of free speaking. Yet our agnostic hero steps up for the Church. " Do we really have such little respect for our freedom to speak, to debate and even to mock?" Bolt. I guess sides are more important than principle

 

 

 

Syria won’t be solved, and the Islamic State will become too useful to too many

The longer Bolt's blogs the less he has to offer and the more he wants to convince.

Firstly Bolt  is right ISIS is useful for him as an extreme Conservative who is anti Islam , anti Immigration and anti any notion of tolerance. He is a denier of and active destroyer of the grey zone in which Australians have historically  lived. He is  definitely useful to ISIS because they also want to diminish no do away with the notion of multiculturalism. Coversion & assimilation is both their goals

The idiot General Bolt wants troops on the ground " Nothing is clear or clean in this war. No one can be trusted, as this analysis by Adam Garfinkle of the Foreign Policy Research Institute makes clear:" Bolt.  Bolt even in camouflaged rhetoric makes it clear even our allies can't be trusted.  Turkey  happily and actively supports ISIS keeping their supply lines of funds, supplies and recruits  open. That Andrew Bolt is a political understanding. All Bolt can say is" So Turkey is not so unhappy with the rise of the Islamic State"Now that's the level of Bolt Intelligence, a standout example of an oxymoron.   ISIS wants foreign troops on the ground. They know it will boost their recruits and sympathizers.

Given  there is no chance that anybody can be trusted Bolt says it's necessary for the coalition to send in uniformed coalition troops SAS into a territory where IS is buried among the people.  Maybe Bolt suggests sending them in ununiformed so that even the coalition wont be able to recognize itself. Neither  makes sense only death. According to Bolt it's "virtually impossible"  any political solution to be found without sending in troops in to help people we don't recognize or fully trust" apparently this is how peace was made historically at the barrell of a gun. "and it is even less likely if the US and Australia keep rejecting the idea of sending soldiers to help those “moderate” Sunnis fight:" History has told us otherwise. Bolt can't even name these moderates who aren't soldiers but are farmers who have been given. vague banner called the FSA. Whose members have  joined ISIS with their US weapons because they pay better.

Bolt calls out for the escalation of bombing with disregard for any  notion of "collateral damage" or "excessive" after all they are only terms  that can be argued about later as can the actual numbers killed which can always be denied. Bolt wants to help ISIS with his 1000 bombing sorties fictionally called "targeted" Targeted like the Israelis raids in Gaza. A proven formula that wins the hearts and minds of the people. He is the  general in Dr Strangelove.

So where Bolt  says there is "virtually no chance of a political settlement" he wants to ensure there isn't.  Settlements have been seen to be made regularly among the rebels and with Turkey war is on going arrangements and not just attempts at final solutions.  It seems any solution minimizing further deaths is far better than one guaranteeing more. But not according to general Bolt who directs  his war from his kitchen table making sweeping generalizations that can't in fact be made. It's why we are abandoning Afghanistan because the sweeping generalizations of the past have always proved to be wrong and  only resulted in people being sent home in body bags.

Andrew Bolt's Blog, 11/6/15; Newscorp's reporting of a 14 year old girl in bikini being mauled by a cop; Tony Abbott Dual Citizen should be sacked Triggs is legal; Bolt's repetitive lie; Bolt deflects the G7 criticism of Abbott; Bolt proves he's worse than Jimmy Olsen; Lazy Lazy Blogger;

 

 

 

How Newscorp goes about presenting the news ‘The Girl Was No Saint Either': Fox Jumps To Defend McKinney Police Officer’s Brutal Manhandling Of Teen Girl At Pool Party. How Fox News Presents it

Below we see Bolt doing the same after Dutton was caught out lying by his own department

  If Hanson-Young is our dumbest politician, it’s not because her critics are sexist

Link The Age

What character assassination simply because Peter Dutton supported by Hadley  was trying to deflect attention away from the fact his department revealed he was lying?

"This week it was confirmed that a number of Wilson staff were involved in the trailing of Ms Hanson-Young when she visited the detention centre on Nauru in late 2013, under the Abbott government. During a Senate committee on Tuesday, Mr Pezzullo confirmed the unauthorised operation had occurred. " 

 There will be no apologizing for lying about on water matters. How will these stooges  justify the lie? One doesn't need to take two steps back to see the award for dumbest politicians at the moment is a neck and neck race between Abbott and his wind mills, Dutton and his ignorance and Hockey in his denial of a housing problem. I will nominate Dutton for now as he has the least imagination and takes advice which I believe he always executes in error. Remember when he promised to live in Cambodia as a refugee. He deserves to win as the others have won it so many times before. Hanson-Young wasn't spied on, Dutton says - Sky News

 Immigration Department confirms Sarah Hanson-Young was ...

  This is Hadley and Bolt's version of the above Fox News Story saying a 14 year old black girl "was no saint either" after  a cop was filmed brutalizing her.  After Dutton was caught lying, dissing and ridiculing Young Hadley and Bolt have jumped in to say "she's no saint either" That folks is Murdoch and 2GB Media.

 

Abbott: wind farms are “visually awful”

Link Paywall to Murdoch

Here we go Bolt has recognized stupidity coming from the free wheeling Abbott mouth. Coal Mines are Beautiful  might be Abbott's next slogan. Fighter Jets are Magnificent,Submarines Superb. Conscript and Cut Unemployment. Uniforms Unite Us. All of these are slogans Abbott would indulge in.

Yes Bolt knows what's coming and he knows why Stupid is what Stupid does and he's telling us. Who needs enemies when you've got Bolt. By the way the Dutch think they're wonderful. Are wind farms noisy?

 

Unemployment down again

Link The Australian

WHAT YOU DON'T HEAR FROM BOLT

Bolt obviuosly pays no heed to what the head of the Reserve Bank has to sayReserve Bank governor Glenn Stevens: More infrastructure spending now, please 

 Reserve Bank governor Glenn Stevens flags further interest rate cut and calls for stimulus

 

 

Column - Are Hockey’s critics mad?

Link Paywall to Murdoch

He is in Sydney average house price is $980K and units $786.

Could any one supporter of Joe Hockey's explain the How of the equation hockey is asking. let alone the when. This abstract financial advice that Bolt seems to treasure as wisdom would help nobody. 

Bolt complains about student style harranging but that's what he does . Where is the math Mr Bolt the Math! Here is the How question which Hockey and Bolt fail to address.

 HOW are first home buyers are meant to purchase a house in a city where the average price of housing is about to hit $1mill. Cut the long winded rhetoric Bolt and answer  the simple question of HOW? Hockey is free to answer the question as well.

Wait for the long silence folks it will be deafening!!! 

 

House prices: is the ground beginning to shift?

Joe Hockey’s housing comments prompt call for crackdown on politicians using taxpayers’ funds to pay off Canberra houses – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

What do MPs contribute to our economy by paying off their Canberra investment homes with tax payer money? If politicians used commercial accommodation they would be increasing the level of employment in Canberra. They all do a Hockey and merely increase their Capital holdings which a accrue capital gain and collect rent which reduces their mortgage and enables them to negative gear they gain a lot. They are the investors pushing the price of housing up and locking first home buyers out of the market. What first home buyer has access to these subsidies? However the economy gains a little tax. So much for the trickle down effect.

These Mr Bolt are not fact bred  from envy or lazy twittering. Is Andrew Bolt whizz reporter found on the streets interviewing, researching being the active journalist not on your life! He's scared of the streets. He's being sent posts by his Trolls. He cuts and pastes is a paywall for Murdoch and writes at most a few Dorothy Dix comments at either end of the cut and paste.  University publications are so much better than his postured rants and Butthead jokes he shares with Bevis Blair. He, more than most, feeds off Twitter which he scoffs at. Who really is the lounge lizard reporter, no blogger in his imaginary superman suit? These lounge room blog feeds directly into his Dolt Report and supportfest. It's why it has no ratings yet paid for by Murdoch for Ch10.

Column - Gillian Triggs was right so should resign

Link Paywall to the Herald Sun

UNHCR

 " It is a statutory body funded by, but operating independently of, the Australian Government. It has the responsibility for investigating alleged infringements under Australia's anti-discrimination legislation. Matters that can be investigated by the Commission under the Australian Human Rights Commission Regulations 1989 include "discrimination on the grounds of race or nationality, religious, colour or ethnic origin, racial vilification, age, sex or gender, sexual harassment, marital or relationship status, sexual orientation, gender identity, intersex status, actual or potential pregnancy, breastfeeding, trade union activity, criminal record, medical record, impairment or physical disability".

Character assassination is  the realm of extremists that really haven't a case to argue and backs to the wall. Bolt reduces arguments to just that and has on innumerable occasions trying to protect Abbott.  Logic flies out the door. He becomes Tony Abbott the bully. He wouldn't dare call for a plebiscite on  Gillian Triggs , yet he knows what the public think.

What Andrew Bolt and Tony Abbott rely on is an uninformed electorate that doesn't necessarily realize the statutory powers granted Commissioners and their Independence of government. Any influence deemed to be exerted over a commissioner is contrary to the law and the antithesis of a functioning Democracy. 

Bolt should be complaining about Abbott who could quite easily go to his appointed Governor General and try to have Gillian Triggs removed. Why isn't Bolt urging him to do that? It wont happen because he would look a fool. In the mean time all we see is a PM complaining about this independent body disrespecting not only the laws of the land but also the very structure of our democracy. Those who have done so throughout history and  succeeded have simply been the worst dictators of either the left or right one party states where nobody is able to hold governments to account.

Given Abbott wont even respond to a request to prove he is entitled to be our PM because he's not a dual citizen on can only assume that of the two Triggs or Abbott who should really be removed. It's not Triggs she is legal. There is something wrong with the nature of our government if this simple question can't be resolved. Nothing but the truth would be best

 

Warren Mundine has destroyed the chances of a race-based Parliament. Praise him

Link Paywall to Murdoch & a sneaky link back to Bolt & then yet another link back to Bolt

Note how easily Bolt distributes SMH links freely but makes you pay to see Murdoch's useless treasures.

" Pearson’s proposal for a separate declaration on indigenous recognition, as well as the creation within the Constitution of a special indigenous body that must be consulted on all legislation that affects indigenous people,"

This is the lie these Murdochians repeat remorselessly that Pearson doesn't promote. This is why Paul Kelly a Newscorp person of repute implored Newscorp to reign them in. The lie continues  when Bolt insists

" Aboriginal representative body, enshrined in the Constitution, to advise on all legislation affecting Aborigines:"

Without this lie which needs to be believed they haven't any legs to stand on.

WHAT BOLT WONT TELL YOU

The representative body is not being asked to be enshrined in the constitution at all  nor is it expected to have special powers. However it's asked to be elected from the ground up by indigenous people and not someone appointed by the government. This is the degree to which Aborigines are precluded from our history

War Memorial Boss Fudges Answer On Enduring Silence About 

 

Big Green pays for Fairfax warmist

 Link SMH 2012

It's not what Hannam said that's the story Mr Bolt It's what members of the G7 said. Are you saying Hannam is lying and the G7 members actually think Tony Abbott is a leading light when it comes to Climate Change. All your trying to do is deflect from the real story.Revealed: Millions in covert donations are backing the climate denial movement

 

What did the bill from Shorten actually buy? More votes for his political rise?

Link SMH

A cut and paste and a two sentence blog. 

10 Years ago something happened someone "well positioned"said. Its well known that successful business men that gain knighthoods crushed the life out of people on their climb up the ladder and that they wouldn't like their pasts examined too closely. Maybe Bolt would prefer to revision his history. Anne Summers certainly portrayed it differently to Bolt.

Cesar Melham’s troubled memory

Link Herald Sun

Bolt just keeps kicking the dead it's quality of lazy work . Note just how much he doesn't write. It's all in the professional cut and paste. High school students and Twitter users just couldn't match his professionalism.

Genocide and Julia

Link Unsourced Troll

Bolt accused Twitter users as lazy bloggers Well let it be said Bolt's no Clarke Kent!!