Showing posts with label CSIRO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CSIRO. Show all posts

Saturday, 22 December 2018

Andrew Bolt's Blog, 22/12/18; Bolt's failing ratings requires him to recycle the same old same old on every media possible daily and weekly. Where would he be without the ABC Fairfax and of course News Corp?






 

 CSIRO says renewables to be cheaper than coal even without climate policy

Wrong again Mr Bolt
“Our data confirms that while existing fossil fuel power plants are competitive due to their sunk capital costs, solar and wind generation technologies are currently the lowest-cost ways to generate electricity for Australia, compared to any other new-build technology," CSIRO chief energy economist Paul Graham said.
"This also holds when the cost of fossil generation technology is adjusted for climate policy risk or not."
The report found if nuclear power was built it would be the most expensive form of power, while gas is the cheapest.


1h
PAYWALL

Is it a coincidence that News Corp, it's staff, Rupert Murdoch and the Liberal Party itself is so closely aligned with the IPA? Is it a coincidence that Andrew Bolt whispers in an echo chamber that he can reveal the true structure of Get Up as if it were a secret society among us. It's a bit of a joke when you compare the transparency of Get Up with the lack of the same degree with the IPA.

Democracy? Yes, it's worth talking about because Andrew Bolt certainly doesn't the Liberal Party passed the Warringah Motion declaring a strike for Democracy had been made and that party members now had a democratic choice in preselecting the candidates that were to represent them in their seats. The reality of this branch control was noted when Morrison offered a $350,000 bribe for the member running against Craig Kelly MP in his district's preselection race to step aside, why? Because Kelly, not a bully had the power and was threatening to move to the crossbench if the government didn't back him instead of the member they really wanted. That's Democracy in the Liberal Party where the tail is able and does wag the dog no matter what the majority want.
 The structure of the board of the IPA isn't publicly known and it's tight-lipped about its donors yet it's a registered Charity? What is known is that one member Gina Rinehart is the groups biggest donor and as such control's the Liberal Party's biggest think tank to the tune of $4.5 mill over a 2 year period and that it had 4,500 financially paid up members at the end of 2017. Are these voting members their capacity is unknown? Mrs Rinehart constituted approx 33% of the IPA's income. "Dr Paul Williams, a political scientist at Griffith University, told The New Daily Ms Rinehart “kept the IPA afloat” so it could continue to take the case to the Liberal Party that would support her views." Further, we know this "secret society" is a direct training ground for young Liberal Party MP's like Wilson and Patterson and that current Liberal MP's are members and as are ex.AFP asked to investigate $350,000 job offer to Craig Kelly challenger
Bolt claims he was educated at Adelaide University "but didn't finish" no reason whether it was for a week a year or why he didn't finish really. He says because he got a job. That too is gilding the Lilly he didn't get a job according to reports his "mother did. One wonders why his mother found it necessary to get her son a job and he did not do it himself. Why did mum intervene in her adult son's future? Did he fail his first year at University? One thing is for certain to say he was educated at Adelaide University isn't what the University would say he may have been enrolled for a short period but he wasn't educated there and Bolt seems to be playing with words

Get Up isn't a membership organization in any shape or form that might be considered a secret organization like the IPA as Andrew Bolt tries to make out in his new podcast. The fact that unions openly donate to Get Up is a source of pride it's not a secret that needs to be whispered by Bolt in his newly created echo chamber. I should think as the recent Royal Commission into the Unions which discovered little or nothing in the way of corruption coupled in the 5-star rating given Industry Superfunds by the Royal Commission into Banking shows that Bolt's attempts to flag dishonest is simply a fabrication.
Bolt's efforts into whispering that the structure of Get Up is somehow corrupt simply because it's a democratic funding platform for political issues chosen and donated by individuals and organizations made up of voting individuals like unions and other bodies one clearly sees there is nothing secretive about it if compared with the IPA where little or no information is available. Get Up's alliance is with organizations made up of voting individuals of which are open to scrutiny as with the forced Public  Royal Commission into the Unions the same can't be said of the IPA if such an investigation were held and it's relationship with News Corp, it's staff, Rupert Murdoch and members of the Liberal Party which far from its title of being simply a research think tank.

The Liberal Party and the Institute of Public Affairs: Who is Whose?

 

Bolt's seems to be following Fox News and has turned on Trump only because Head office has. He still refuses to admit he was wrong maintaining Trump has done more good than bad stealing Greg Sheridan's line. However, even a broken clock is right twice a day unintentionally. Bolt doesn't even have that to boast about.




US President Donald Trump.

'He just refounded ISIS': Fox News bucks Trump, again

A Fox and Friends host tore into one of Trump's most controversial decision this week. And Trump was listening.
So Bolt is following Head Office never a leader just a lackey isn't he?


  Misinformer of the Year: 21st Century Fox Executive Chairman Lachlan Murdoch

 

The Murdochs’ Fox News, a uniquely destructive force in American public life that ushered in an era of post-truth politics, has been unleashed under President Donald Trump. The network now functions as a propaganda outlet for his administration, embracing any level of extremism, deceit, and bigotry necessary to promote the president’s message while scorning basic principles of journalistic ethics.
Lachlan Murdoch has consistently lied about what his network does and what it is, even as the people who work for him have breached the norms of their profession in increasingly flagrant ways and become ever more entangled with the Trump administration.



Friday, 28 October 2016

Andrew Bolt's Blog, 28/10/16. Bolt shows himself to be what he truly is Not an Australian; Why the hell should Triggs get on with Brandis; Snouts in the trough and their size; Why should Bolt's kids be subsidized as much as I hate to say it they are our future too; Imagine a society of Bolt's demands for acknowledging all past errors?

 

 



Who let them in? The Hamzy case

 

Image result for Images of a wreath for mourning

 


Aquek Nyok saved the lives of passengers on a burning bus in Moorooka today

Bolt's selective list to fit his bigoted narrative. 

" Our immigration program is putting Australians in danger. Today's examples involve a killer, a gang member jailed for manslaughter and a man with two wives. And once again we must ask: who let them in?"Bolt

What was headline news today and what hasn't Bolt stopped for in the rush to talk about his list?

 A 48 year old white Australian by the name of O'Donahue threw petrol over Manmeet Sharma a 29 year old Hindu Brahmin  bus driver and set him alight. He's dead now one might well ask of that dead man "who let him in" if they hadn't he might still be alive. However Manmeet doesn't fit Andrew Bolt's narrative so he makes no mention of him nor does he mention that a taxi driver who saved the lives of the 11 passengers on board that bus was an African. The Project and Waleed Aly certainly made it a center piece of their show. It shows a clear difference in who does and doesn't deserve respect when it comes to our media.

Bolt however had to rush to make his narrative point 
"Can you trust our politicians with our immigration and refugee programs? Can you trust them to bring in 12,000 Syrians and Iraqis without endangering you?"Bolt  My point is why does Pauline Hanson and Andrew Bolt encourage the O'Donahues of Australia to come out from under their rocks? If the colors of the people in this story had been reversed Andrew Bolt would have been the first up in arms calling it a terrorist event. One covered up by the police for saying "it wasn't an act of terror". Today there's nothing just silence.

Why the hell should Brandis get on with Trigg...

 Image result for Images of polar opposites

Bolt is amazing basically this is a post that links to Bolt's post of yesterday condemning Gillian Triggs to his "list" of his previous  posts . Bolt loves lists and is somewhat obsessive about collecting things to put in them. Items selectively chosen that often have no connection other than they in his list. It is a linked post a chain post if you will  linked to his columns, radio TV editorials and books.  A gram of gold they say can be stretched to the moon and it's still a gram of gold.  Bolt stretches a post much the same way and it's still a single thought bubble. It's why his lecturers at Adelaide Uni waved him goodbye so quickly.  Bolt's work ethic is reflected in his lazy Susan of ideas. In this case a single idea that goes around more times than a revolving door and Gillian Triggs is the brunt. Who pray tell in either the Liberal or Labor Party or those among the public service get on with George Brandis? His profession's elected representatives  all highly regarded lawyers one and all are crying out for him to leave why?  He is an embarrassment to the profession. Having given Brandis a break after break after break his incompetence  just keeps floating to the surface time after time after time again. Even the Supreme Court have declared him to be wrong and all Bolt can say is "give him a break". As for Gillian Triggs cream also rises and Australians one and all are grateful for her reminding us that we too can be better than this George Brandis just happens to do it in a different way. The notion of  two people getting on is dependent on being next to each other you couldn't envisage two more polar opposites than Brandis and Triggs. 

Poochgate Minister in more strife

 Image result for Images of snouts in the trough


Who was punished the hardest who got the most

Bolt's a piece of work isn't he. He snaps like a bear trap when a Labor minister is caught with his snout in the trough but was just an over stretched rubber band when Abbott's front bench was caught out ripping the country off. Tony Abbott claimed flights to weddings and birthday parties and less than a peep from Bolt. Yet  he was happy to see Peter Slipper driven to the the point of  suicide over $900 of cab charges. It's just the way Andrew Bolt rolls. It has nothing to do with principle as far as Bolt is concerned it's all to do with the team you back. Do you hear Andrew Bolt up in arms about all politicians  and their bad behavior ?

If you actually consider rip offs in the work place and consider if people, we get real value for money  for  productive labor done Bolt would be the Peter Foster of media . He is exorbitantly over paid  for the least amount of productive work done. What  value is he to our GDP's bottom line compared with the African or other migrants cleaning the medical waste  off our hospital floors? Compared to Waleed Aly he's little more than the Kim Karadashian of Australian media all style no substance. I died laughing at this post. 

The pot calling the kettle black work for the dollar is being evaluated here by Andrew Bolt in our society. the top 10% earn their keep simply on interest and rent on capital gained through inheritance. It's why the term the  "idle rich" rings  true and fits Australian life. The "idle poor" doesn't have the same resonance as Bolt would like it to have does it. It's why he uses other terms because  "idle rich "and "idle poor" just don't sit well together. It's why people like Bolt spit out the term "bludgers" it's even worse because he says people love and wallow in unemployment and the enforced Culture of Poverty that accompanies it.

 

Handouts should never beat wages

 Image result for Images of private school subsidies

However here Bolt is comparing naming and shaming Australians for expecting benefits or assistance in raising children as if Australians like himself have no interest or need to invest as much as they do in Australia's future. " Thousands of parents claiming government benefits are financially better off not getting a job, with new figures showing they ­receive at least $45,000 a year ­tax-free, more than the take-home pay of most Australian workers." Bolt  No says Bolt if your unemployed and have kids tough effen luck as if Bolt never recieved any assistance when raising his own direct or indirect.
"The Australian reveals that the top 10 per cent of those on parenting benefits, about 43,200 people, received at least $45,032 in 2014-15." Bolt 

Question Bolt has 3 kids all at private schools. Why should I be subsidizing his kids to the tune of $30,000 ++ Is it simply because his wages are over and above the handout? Bolt regrets that in a non socialist country we are required to invest in children other than our own however he totally overlooks just how much we have invested in his not for education purposes but soley for the networks maintained that make who you know still more important than what you know. Yes Bolt believes in going Dutch hates sharing even when he gets a greater benefit.That is the head space of those who feel they are born to rule even when they are not one of them.

 


CSIRO and Bureau should apologise for this sc...


 Image result for Images of methods of prediction




 

Does Bolt demand that we back track and explain the history of genetics in every report made in 2016? Science is a progressive discipline are all scientists required to explain the past errors made? Those errors are continually evaluated in the peer review process. Obviously something Andrew Bolt doesn't understand doesn't want to or doesn't want us to. Does he demand the same of his doctor when he makes a diagnosis. Please explain the historic errors made in the field of medicine before predicting what's wrong with me?

Talk about lists and repetition Bolt continues collecting his list and conflating the CSIRO and Meteorology with Global Climate  Science  two entirely different endeavors. Not everything  the CSIRO does is the same as the Dept of Meteorology and neither necessarily do what is compatible with what's regarded as Global Climate Science. That explains why Bolt's demand for predictions as accurate as Newton's Laws of motion is  moronic.

Last week he was praising scientific research in the field of medicine distinguishing it from the empirical and anectotal methods of Homeopathy, Chinese Medicine and Naturopathy which he felt were closer to religious faiths. What he was praising was Scientific Method. Bolt reverses that when it comes to  Global Climate Science and declares it a religion despite the e fact that the methodology is the same. Meteorology is pretty good at predicting our short term weather but Bolt seems to suggests it's an example of the failure of the science In other words he hasn't a clue or intentionally confuses the difference. As for the CSIRO he seems to think like subs it's a waste of money we can let others do it and buy it back for half the price. Why should we be leaders in scientific  thinking anyway when others can do it for us and we can be utilitarian in what we choose.  Bolt somehow has thrown the baby out with the bath water and opted for Christian Science as the end of the spectrum that might serve us best as all truth is not always helpful economically.

 

 

Rewriting Turnbull's vacuous waffle

More posts Andrew Bolt simply doesn't get it the Liberal Party isn't the Conservative Party he insists it should be. To insist it is is destroying it. yes the moderates accept the fact that Conservatives exist if they didn't those in the Monkey Pod Room would be out on their ear. Yes Turnbull has bent over backwards to accommodate them and show that the Liberal Party was in fact a broad church something the Abbott faction refuses to do. While the Conservatives have shamed Australia they have made room for the likes of Pauline Hanson and have ensured that the problems the country faces will not be solved because bills won't be passed due to their forced intransigence we don't have a government and even if they win power again we still won't have one.

Andrew Bolt's Blog,28/10/16. Why the hell should Triggs get on with Brandis; Snouts in the trough and their size; Why should Bolt's kids be subsidized as much as I hate to say it they are our future too; Imagine a society of Bolt's demands for acknowledging all past errors?


 

Why the hell should Brandis get on with Trigg...

 Image result for Images of polar opposites

Bolt is amazing basically this is a post that links to Bolt's post of yesterday condemning Gillian Triggs to his "list" of his previous  posts . Bolt loves lists and is somewhat obsessive about collecting things to put in them. Items selectively chosen that often have no connection other than they in his list. It is a linked post a chain post if you will  linked to his columns, radio TV editorials and books.  A gram of gold they say can be stretched to the moon and it's still a gram of gold.  Bolt stretches a post much the same way and it's still a single thought bubble. It's why his lecturers at Adelaide Uni waved him goodbye so quickly.

 Bolt's work ethic is reflected in his lazy Susan of ideas. In this case a single idea that goes around more times than a revolving door and Gillian Triggs is the brunt. Who pray tell in either the Liberal or Labor Party or those among the public service get on with George Brandis? His profession's elected representatives  all highly regarded lawyers one and all are crying out for him to leave why?  He is an embarrassment to the profession. Having given Brandis a break after break after break his incompetence  just keeps floating to the surface time after time after time again. Even the Supreme Court have declared him to be wrong and all Bolt can say is "give him a break". As for Gillian Triggs cream also rises and Australians one and all are grateful for her reminding us that we too can be better than this George Brandis just happens to do it in a different way. The notion of  two people getting on is dependent on being next to each other you couldn't envisage two more polar opposites than Brandis and Triggs.

 

Poochgate Minister in more strife

 Image result for Images of snouts in the trough

Who was punished the hardest who got the most

Bolt's a piece of work isn't he. He snaps like a bear trap when a Labor minister is caught with his snout in the trough but was just an over stretched rubber band when Abbott's front bench was caught out ripping the country off. Tony Abbott claimed flights to weddings and birthday parties and less than a peep from Bolt. Yet  he was happy to see Peter Slipper driven to the the point of  suicide over $900 of cab charges. It's just the way Andrew Bolt rolls. It has nothing to do with principle as far as Bolt is concerned it's all to do with the team you back. Do you hear Andrew Bolt up in arms about all politicians  and their bad behavior ?

If you actually consider rip offs in the work place and consider if people, we get real value for money  for  productive labor done Bolt would be the Peter Foster of media . He is exorbitantly over paid  for the least amount of productive work done. What  value is he to our GDP's bottom line compared with the African or other migrants cleaning the medical waste  off our hospital floors? Compared to Waleed Aly he's little more than the Kim Karadashian of Australian media all style no substance. I died laughing at this post. 

The pot calling the kettle black work for the dollar is being evaluated here by Andrew Bolt in our society. the top 10% earn their keep simply on interest and rent on capital gained through inheritance. It's why the term the  "idle rich" rings  true and fits Australian life. The "idle poor" doesn't have the same resonance as Bolt would like it to have does it. It's why he uses other terms because  "idle rich "and "idle poor" just don't sit well together. It's why people like Bolt spit out the term "bludgers" it's even worse because he says people love and wallow in unemployment and the enforced Culture of Poverty that accompanies it.

 

Handouts should never beat wages

 Image result for Images of private school subsidies

However here Bolt is comparing naming and shaming Australians for expecting benefits or assistance in raising children as if Australians like himself have no interest or need to invest as much as they do in Australia's future. " Thousands of parents claiming government benefits are financially better off not getting a job, with new figures showing they ­receive at least $45,000 a year ­tax-free, more than the take-home pay of most Australian workers." Bolt  No says Bolt if your unemployed and have kids tough effen luck as if Bolt never recieved any assistance when raising his own direct or indirect.
"The Australian reveals that the top 10 per cent of those on parenting benefits, about 43,200 people, received at least $45,032 in 2014-15." Bolt 

Question Bolt has 3 kids all at private schools. Why should I be subsidizing his kids to the tune of $30,000 ++ Is it simply because his wages are over and above the handout? Bolt regrets that in a non socialist country we are required to invest in children other than our own however he totally overlooks just how much we have invested in his not for education purposes but soley for the networks maintained that make who you know still more important than what you know. Yes Bolt believes in going Dutch hates sharing even when he gets a greater benefit.That is the head space of those who feel they are born to rule even when they are not one of them.

 

CSIRO and Bureau should apologise for this sc...

 Image result for Images of methods of prediction

 

Does Bolt demand that we back track and explain the history of genetics in every report made in 2016? Science is a progressive discipline are all scientists required to explain the past errors made? Those errors are continually evaluated in the peer review process. Obviously something Andrew Bolt doesn't understand doesn't want to or doesn't want us to. Does he demand the same of his doctor when he makes a diagnosis. Please explain the historic errors made in the field of medicine before predicting what's wrong with me?

Talk about lists and repetition Bolt continues collecting his list and conflating the CSIRO and Meteorology with Global Climate  Science  two entirely different endeavors. Not everything  the CSIRO does is the same as the Dept of Meteorology and neither necessarily do what is compatible with what's regarded as Global Climate Science. That explains why Bolt's demand for predictions as accurate as Newton's Laws of motion is  moronic.

Last week he was praising scientific research in the field of medicine distinguishing it from the empirical and anectotal methods of Homeopathy, Chinese Medicine and Naturopathy which he felt were closer to religious faiths. What he was praising was Scientific Method. Bolt reverses that when it comes to  Global Climate Science and declares it a religion despite the e fact that the methodology is the same. Meteorology is pretty good at predicting our short term weather but Bolt seems to suggests it's an example of the failure of the science In other words he hasn't a clue or intentionally confuses the difference. As for the CSIRO he seems to think like subs it's a waste of money we can let others do it and buy it back for half the price. Why should we be leaders in scientific  thinking anyway when others can do it for us and we can be utilitarian in what we choose.  Bolt somehow has thrown the baby out with the bath water and opted for Christian Science as the end of the spectrum that might serve us best as all truth is not always helpful economically.


Thursday, 18 February 2016

Andrew Bolt's blog,18/2/16; Bolt just contradicts himself; The agnostic Bolt sees Pell as Christ which is blasphemy; Steve Ciobo puts Bolt down; Minchen's irreverence is Australain Humour; The continuous war and the never ending story;


 

 

 


How dare the ABC interview Peter Fox to damn George Pell

Bolt's appalled!! Judge Bolt mind you is appalled and he's selling us his shtik that he alone knows  credible  from incredible witnesses  as if the  the Royal Commission isn't run by professionals. Is Bolt scared the commissioners will all be influenced by others rather than Bolt himself? 

 So Peter Fox intends to go to the Vatican. Does Bolt know he'll even get an audience with Pell? Bolt actually knows Jack S@#t. All he is doing is posturing  and it always begins with "I'm appalled" 40 years in media and 10 + odd as an opinionator and we know the last thing he is is appalled. The ABC trotted out Peter Fox because he's news and news is their business unlike News Corp they are not in the business of advocacy.

" Peter Fox seemed to me from the start to be man with an axe to grind: " Bolt quoting himself. The ABC doesn't disparage or opinionate like that.

"Chief Inspector Peter Fox was the ABC’s star witness in the case against the Catholic Church" Bolt is quoting himself again as a source. It's cute but deceptive. He does it all the time. Proof  Bolt quoting himself again here.

Why, all Bolt doing is deflecting to cast doubt should Pell be found less than honest. Peter Fox is his modus operendi. When have you ever witnessed the ABC being so blatantly obvious?

Bolt goes to great lengths  to disparage Peter Fox  in order to claim the ABC is biased. However it's Bolt whose advocating, advocating for George Pell and the Catholic church "It is astonishing - disgraceful - that the ABC still turns to this man for commentary on the Catholic church." The ABC is just reporting the news and we are entitled to know."As I said, Cardinal Pell is the victim of a despicable witch hunt. For the state-funded ABC, our biggest media organisation, to join that witch hunt is very, very sinister." Bolt.The only witch hunt visible here is the emotional posturing by Bolt against Peter Fox in order to disparage the ABC and take the heat if there is any off George Pell.  Apparently Pell's office released a statement saying he was ready to comply to the Royal Commissions requests any way he could. Given that why the histrionics and drama Andrew Bolt? It seems Pell doesn't read the Herald Sun or the undistinguished Andrew Bolt.

" He feels vindicated about some of his allegations against police after the NSW Police Integrity Commission was told last month that police may have ‘‘condoned’’ or even ‘‘encouraged’’ the cover-up of child sexual abuse by the Catholic Church."Peter Fox Chief Inspector 36 years in the force a distiguished officer.

 



 

Turnbull camp’s blame-Abbott excuse is a fib. UPDATE: Now more jobless, too

If your not with Bolt your in the Turnbull camp even if your if your a coalition insider Niki Savva was Peter Costello's former adviser and a member of John Howard"s staff an accurate observer of conservative politics and a senior member of the Canberra Press Gallery. One need only ask what accreditation Andrew Bolt has or any of his trolls that do this work for him. Oh spin doctor whose pre requisite is to polish the turd and try as best he can to put a shine on Tony Abbott. Truth Bolt has no other expertise. In the big tent of the political media circus Savva is queen of the high trapeze. Bolt well he's still a jealous roustabout waiting for his turn to be clapped. All of Bolt's talk of camps is somewhat melodramatic giving him the air of a war games gun. Unfortunately he's just a toy one.

Oh so there was a white paper to be put out just as there is a white paper to be argued now. As Steve Ciobo said Abbott's leadership was not collegiate Turnbull's is. Bolt fails to mention Abbott's folly his first budget secretive for 7 months that turned out to be a bundle of broken promises and a major disaster. That quickly brought him around to say the budget was fixed. That's what was the only real activity the rest was yes to be discussed. Bolt's energy is  simple counter any thing that makes Tony Abbot look bad no matter how. That's his charter. So disparage 1 Niki Savva 2 concoct a positive about Abbott and 2 disparage the Turnbull team. The trouble is the positives about Abbott are few and far between so it's the shortest part of the excercise recycling spin the Abbott team had put out in the first place. Yawn Bolt's problem is the strength of the Turnbull camp compared with Abbott's  the personalities involved and how they are perceived in the public eye.

 

 

 

 

In praise of the CSIRO boss

The boss of CSIRO made one off the cuff statement and apologised loudly. However the News Corp cranks will never let him forget it now and they have raised their reluctant hero on their shoulders kicking and screaming. The CSIRO boss has been directed to cut 300 scientists of their jobs. The direction where those cuts were to be made not entirely uninfluenced. Scrotum face Mc Crann is singing Hosanna the person who has made the greatest, boldest and, dare I say it, most “innovative” contribution to Australia so far this year?"

Where do these numbnuts at News Corp get the balls to bullshit like this? the CSIRO, but which has been in sad decline for most of this century" Queens pde  or CSIRO boulevard was as internationally famous as Silicon Valley just check the Nobel prize nominations. It's research station at Highett also renowned. How can the least intelligent economic columnist in the country be given this platform by Andrew Bolt who in today's blog clearly said of Tim Minchen " He reminds me of one of the ugly phenomena of the Twitter generation: the sweatless morality of seeming good simply by vilifiying others." Yet he posts scrotum Mc Crann as pearls of wisdom.

 

 

Column - Crucifying Pell

 

 image

This is yesterdays story Bolt turns  Pell into  a Christlike figure and says he's "the most senior" person in the Catholic church.

 Basically Bolt the agnostic wants the us  to throw the baby out (the law) with the bath water( the comission ).  Yes turn our backs on the law and  somehow  leave Pell in peace and let any decisions rest in the hands of god but not Ceasar why? Simply because he's old and ailing and has a medical certificate. Matthias Corman said that about the executives of the banks when caught red handed supporting the fraudulent activities committed by their underlings. Matthias said "It's history lets' get over it". This seems the same response here by Bolt. 

Bolt slags off the Catholic community for not protecting the Christ like Pell. Well Bolt it might surprise you there are Catholics everywhere even on the  Royal commission and none give Pell the Christ like reverence you do. In the eyes of Catholics Pell is just another  sinner as are the pedophile priests. He's a man just as all priests nuns and Catholics are no more no less. He's given his service to the church that's all. He is not the exceptional man you a non Catholic make him out to be. He to also goes to confession. To regard him as Christ-like Bolt is in fact blasphemy not only in the Catholic Church but in all the Abrahamic religions.

 

 

 

All talk and no action on Turnbull’s economic “vision”

What Andrew Bolt called Tim Minchin

 " About Tim Minchin, the sanctimonious and foul-mouthed hypocrite with a history of abusing Catholics with long records of community service."

Well isn't Bolt the sanctmonious and foul-mouthed hypocrite with a history of abusing moderate Liberals with long records of community service?

" He reminds me of one of the ugly phenomena of the Twitter generation: the sweatless morality of seeming good simply by vilifiying others." Bolt

Doesn't he remind you of one of the ugly phenomena of the News Corp generation: the sweatless morality of seeming good simply by vilifying others. Bolt was even found guilty in our courts of his unprofessional approach Minchen wasn't.

 Abbott and Hockey took 7 months to reveal their plan and it blew up in their face Mr Bolt. You  heard Steve Ciobo MP on Q&A. He was once your gallant Liberal knight and on Monday declared that all of what you've been saying is a load of twat that the Liberal party chose a new leader because Abbott was under performing. The decisions that are being made to day aren't captains calls or made behind the closed doors of the PM's office,  but the open decisions of cabinet with Turnbull the elected leader. You were clearly called out by your once staunch gladiator. I guess you will have to get troll Peter BH to put Ciobo back in his place as well.

 Hey wasn't it refreshing to hear Mark Steyn run the Abbott's detention policy down and calling him a pussy for not "owning it" farming it out to contractors instead, whose skirts he could hide behind when push came to shove. Yes another one of your consevative heroes calling Tony Abbott a pussy.

So  if "Morrison took an important first step yesterday to frame ­expectations for his debut budget… [T]he Treasurer was right to get out there early to explain to the millions in the middle the magnitude of the problem and how long it would take to fix it. It can’t be a one-off." Inside source Steve Ciobo MP let it be known that this wa a Turnbull cabinet decision.


 

Didn’t Minchin’s parents teach him about that nasty tongue of his?

Wasn't Bolt  the old fashioned mummy's boy taught to be aloof and had the feeling of Dutch superiority drummed into him. The feeling he was above the primative  and unsophisticated Aussies He needed to keep his distance in case he was tainted. His sanctuary was women only because some reminded him of his mother. Minchin simply reminds him of those crude Aussies he couldn't go near and never understood. The irreverent humour that was always directed at those who thought they were holier than though was beyond him.  It was working class humour Bolt because this was by and large a working class country.  " About Tim Minchin, the sanctimonious and foul-mouthed hypocrite with a history of abusing Catholics with long records of community service." Bolt  Here is Bolt yes the outsider distorting history yet again showing he knows very little about the history of this country where the WASPS treated the micks with suspicion and disdain and treated them like door mats. It's why the country's heroes are Ned Kelly, Squizzy and Collingwood and why some of the men regarded some Catholic Church leaders as working class traitors the functionaries of the WASPS. 

" He reminds me of one of the ugly phenomena of the Twitter generation: the sweatless morality of seeming good simply by vilifiying others." Bolt

Rupert Murdoch with 650,000 followers and just a few who he follows is  the perfect  example of the self  indulgent broadcaster  who lets his global sycophants at News Corp know what it is he's jerking off to. 


Terror in Turkey

It's what was predicted that the Kurds our allies in Iraq and Syria would eventually be forgotten even blamed as terrorists rather than freedom fighters. Bolt does that with ease. Turkey on the other hand NATO calls allies  stood idly by while ISIS destroyed Kobane with the Kurds defending it. Yes Turkey our ally did assist ISIS our enemy and nothing was said. But then nothing was said when the West and Israel assisted ISIS, Al Nusra Front, and other rebel groups in the hope of ridding Syria of Assad a promise made to Israel as far back as the 1980s.

That war has continued to produce the refugees we see today flooding through Turkey to Europe. Andrew Bolt goes so far as to even deny that they are refugees he'd prefer to call them economic invaders. That the wars created by the West had nothing to do with their manufacture. Bolt simply produces a twisted horror story where the west are the crusaders and not the invaders and Europe the victims. It's a piece of propaganda that will never hold water

Whatever happened to the story Shari Markson Bolt's News Corp buddy who  saw first hand Israel assisting terrorists. She even interviewed them before they were armed and sent back into the war to battle Assad. The Israelis paranoid arrested her and it appears extracted promises before letting her go. That story has been buried by News Corp why? Is it because  Rupert Murdoch has invested in Genie Oil who are  exploring for oil on the Golan Heights illegally occupied by Israel? Why is it secret that Israel has become the defacto airforce for the rebels. Maybe be now it can only be said it was since the Russians have joined the fight and we have changed sides and double crossed those we were once helping. Complicated isn't it. Howevert West certainly don't look like crusaders.what if israel is behind the terrorists? - What Really Happened