Andrew Bolt's Blog,26/7/18; Bolt logic is a one-way street and he and his mate Abbott use it against the Sudanese but then the same to themselves; Misogynist Bolt tongue lashes single mums of all classes;

 BREAKING: The Shovel And Sky News To Merge, Creating Australia’s Largest Satirical News Organisation – The Shovel

BRIANNA'S LESSON: HOW MEDIA GROUP THINK IS ENFORCED

Column Readers often ask me: why do many journalists cave in to groupthink on controversial topics such as global warming or immigration? Or, say, African crime gangs? To answer, let me explain what was done to Brianna Travers this week after she interviewed the mother of a woman killed in a fight between two groups of Africans.

16m

PAYWALL
I don't subscribe to the Murdoch No News Zone Press

However applying the Bolt logic and statistics on Immigration to the media we find Bolt to be an "outlier" a recidivist vilifier defamer and object of countless charges and complaints handed to the APC and the AHRC none of which or whom he recognizes to be his judges but who nevertheless upholders of our Australian values of fair go.
 Bolt's a prolific rule breaker in our media has shown he's statistically more likely to break the rules than any other person in our media circles. He skews the record so much so that the media are some 500 times more likely to break the rules set for journalism and journalists.  He singularly has raised the statistics of that small group has given them a bad name and has taken their image of bad behaviour to stratospheric heights, knows it and doesn't care. All for the sake of ratings and attention. It's why he lobbies the government to wipe his record clean and constantly cries unfair.
So applying Bolt's very logic and statistics to Immigration and the South Sudanese. News Corp Journalism and journalists don't integrate into the values of our Media system they degrade it and our values and should be removed.  The complaints about Bolt alone skew statistics on News Corp and if are applied to the News Corp community suggest that they should be banned. But that's only if we don't take into account Bolt's intransigent recidivism and multiple rule-breaking charges which skew the reputation of his community. Simply showing it can't integrate.
Like Andrew Bolt when he tries to vilify the whole South Sudanese community for the actions of a few when it's done to him or one of his he cries foul.  Recidivists like himself with a record of multiple charges and repeated crimes skew statistics and Bolt uses them to stereotype whole communities as does his mate below Tony Abbott below neither of which belong in their chosen professions if they apply their own logic as they do the Sudanese. They more than the Sudanese don't integrate with our values and spend their time telling us just that.

 

 'There is a problem': Tony Abbott questions all African immigration amid gang violence debate

 Abbott's Logic: targets the Sudanese just like Andrew Bolt however when applied to the Tony Abbott's Gang of extreme conservatives it proves they don't belong in our Australian political, social or cultural systems.

 The extreme Conservatives Politicians like TonyAbbott have been caught out lying countless times and damaging the reputation of politics since he was 18.  Caught molesting women, damaging public property. threatening opponents, abusing his expenditure accounts, taking undeclared and questionable gifts and has simply proved his extreme gang of conservatives with their rampant individualism and nationalism are more likely to break the parliamentary rules some 100 times more than the majority of all other MPs. They can't integrate with their own party let alone Australian politics as a whole. Abbott's dysfunctional activities alone have raised the statistical record of the bad behaviour and downgraded and skewed the reputations of all politicians.
Abbott has proved he and his ilk are outliers. So applying Abbott's own logic, statistical method and resultant conclusions to Sudanese it shows his extreme Conservatives can't integrate with the LNP or the Australian parliamentary system. Constantly promising to change they don't but they skew and ensure we all feel Politics doesn't any longer work. 
Their behaviour and values fail us as a whole. So we need to call them into question and ask whether they even belong in our Australian parliament at all. So taking into account the Abbott Gang's rampant Nationalism, Individualism, failure to integrate, their persistent, destructive multiple ongoing bad behaviours, their contribution to the waste of our public monies the damage to rational policies, their constant recidivism and failure to change it proves them to be different totally dysfunctional and unable to change or fit. (ODT)

 If this logic applied to Abbott is wrong and Bolt would be the first to tell us it is then why when applied to South Sudanese Australians isn't it skewed, bigoted, racist, and simply wrong? After all, Tony Abbott is a member of our Australian political system. Unless we are bigots do the actions of a few and skewed stats allow us to negatively stereotype whole communities irrationally simply because we are racists and see political opportunity?

Mr Abbott said Sudanese-born people in Victoria constituted less than 0.1 per cent of the population, but was responsible for "well over" 1 per cent of all crimes committed in that state, and was 57 times more likely to commit aggravated robbery than the general population. ( no mention by Abbott that recidivism and multiple charges of a few skews these stats)
"So there is a problem," he said. "It's an African gang problem, and the Victorian socialist government should get real and own up to the fact that there is an African gang problem in Melbourne."

Mr Abbott called into question the integration of all African migrants.
"I guess the big question though is: why do we store up trouble for ourselves by letting in people who are going to be difficult, difficult to integrate?" he asked.
  Tennant Creek and ‘African gangs’ expose the hypocrisy of white Australia | Jack Latimore | Opinion | The Guardian

 

 

 

 

DROP THE 'SINGLE MUM' EXCUSE, EMMA

Column If federal Labor MP Emma Husar is right, we should expect a single mum to be a workplace bully who makes staff pick up her dog’s droppings. How else to explain her  constant excuses for her alleged bad behaviour? On Tuesday, she did it yet again. “I’m a single mum,” she declared - using again the excuse that insults all single mothers.

16m

 How often have we heard Bolt claim single mums were laggards and dole bludgers just after welfare money never using the word "some" when applying his stereotyping with a single brush. Is he defending them now? Of course, he's not, he's just kicking the shit out of this working single mum because she's not on his side.

 Let's face it yesterday he was defending Senator Leyonjhelm's slut-shaming of Sarah Hanson-Young on Sky News for what he called worse behaviour. He was actually bashing Young and her daughter at the same time protecting yet another male MP who has given Politicians a bad name the equivalent of what Bolt has done for Media

AFGHAN ARRESTED OVER ACID ATTACK ON BOY

Asylum seeking in Britain: "The father of the three-year-old boy doused in acid while shopping with his mother has been arrested...  The 39-year-old suspect, an Afghan asylum seeker..., was the first suspect detectives held after the boy was targeted while sitting in a pushchair during a shopping trip... with his mother."

1h6

Moving to the UK an Afghan is selected to carry the reputational responsibility for all Afghanis who were once and are now Immigrants. Acid throwing and domestic violence isn't the sole domain of either Afghans, Muslims Asylum Seekers or immigrants alone as Bolt tries to make out "Import a people, import a culture:" Bolt One could say import the Dutch and you'll just get bigots and ultra-racists why to let them in. Apparently, British Christians only run amok en-mass at Football games and movies like Clockwork Orange. We certainly weren't winners allowing the Bolt's into Australia Bolt's abuse isn't one on one but it's broadcast bigotry.  The Romani are like the Jews millions killed during the war and still persecuted today by the very people persecuting them today the Bolt's.
Persecution has been no doubt a family tradition handed down the generations. The Dutch broadcast themselves as heroes who protected the Jews during WW2 until the Jews themselves showed the very opposite was true that the Dutch killed more of their own than even the Germans and Bolt's parents and family come from the very most notorious towns it that countries most shameful history Aalsmeer. Where Andrew Bolt still visits on a yearly pilgrimage. So it's not surprising he regularly posts personal interest stories like this sourcing the world over to project his image of what he thinks of others.Wartime and Postwar Dutch Attitudes Toward the Jews: Myth and Truth
" The percentage of Jews from The Netherlands murdered by the Germans and their associates in World War II was higher than in any other Western European country. There were approximately 140,000 Jews in The Netherlands at the outbreak of the war, representing 1.6 percent of the Dutch population, though in Amsterdam they comprised as much as 9.5 percent of the city's population. Some 107,000 Jews were deported from The Netherlands, of whom 102,000 were murdered. Most of the remainder went into hiding, were married to non-Jews and thus freed from deportation, or fled abroad." The rate of survival in North Holland from where Bolt's family is from was among the worst in Europe 27%

MICHAEL GAWENDA FAILS AGAIN. APOLOGISE TO BRIANNA!

Michael Gawenda was editor of The Age and inaugural director of  Melbourne University's Centre for Advanced Journalism. With zero proof he accused a young Herald Sun reporter of faking an interview, and when I called him out he simply made more fake claims about a tape. Read on, and marvel at this man's standards.

30m

"Answer: because he has the "right" political opinions? Ones congenial to the head of Melbourne University?" Bolt
Doesn't attack just Gawenda but one of the finest universities in the world. How desperate is Bolt or should I say isolated when he demeans all our institutions so constantly. Gawenda is right the Herald Sun Journalist has written an article that has had doubt about its authenticity questioned. The Journalist according to Bolt has been maligned why for facts no simply because he keeps repeating she's young and she works for the Herald Sun. Two reasons why the request for verification is more than reasonable and if Andrew Bolt is her defence advocate or mentor and given his disrespect for facts it's even a greater reason to ask for the proof of what was written by Brianna her tape and notes.

Bolt, by the way, attacked even that Institution we call our law and he believes today he was shafted by a left-wing Jewish judge simply for his politics. That Bromberg is never to be forgiven just ridden roughshod over by his mate Tony Abbott but oops, that never happened.
Andrew Bolt works so damn hard to obscure even the most visible of facts if they don't fit his narrative. He will turn to the most obscure and unrelated ones to make his point. So who on earth would go out of their way to believe him here and now?
 A caused B Brianna's article caused a question, a request for verification to be raised. A denial from Andrew Bolt accompanied by an avalanche of protest and everything else simply hides the fact that the request is being refused with taht enormous amount of claptrap and thunder hiding that simple fact.