
Even Fox And Friends: Trump Can't Let Saudi Arabia Get Away With Murdering A Journalist

The Washington Post notes that Trump's claim about Saudi Arabia making $110 billion in arms purchases is false.
"As Willie mentioned, in an interview yesterday, President Trump expressed concern that Khashoggi may have been killed at the consulate, but went on to praise U.S. relations with Saudi Arabia as, quote, 'excellent,' and insisted that any consequences for the disappearance of the U.S.-based journalist would not be economic."
Did Trump listen and did he turn his back on Murdoch's Fox?
Trump On Murdered Reporter: Hey, He Wasn't A Citizen, Right?

Hurricane Michael was one of the strongest hurricanes ever to hit the U.S. but Donald Trump not only couldn’t be bothered to cancel his fundraiser and campaign rally in Erie, Pennsylvania, he found an extra 22 minutes to chitchat with Fox News host Shannon Bream and then another 47 minutes on Fox & Friends the following morning.
Not at all
Amid Michael’s Devastation In Florida, Trump Spent More Than An Hour Shooting The Bull On Fox News
TURKEY CLAIMS: AUDIO TAPE OF SAUDI MURDER
To repeat what I said on Wednesday, this (suspected) murder could destroy Donald Trump's key alliance in the Middle East: "The Turkish government has what it describes as audio and video recordings purporting to show that Saudi Arabian journalist Jamal Khashoggi was killed inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul."
PAYWALL to Murdoch Media
Listening to Trump above it seems he doesn't think so.Wash. Post: How Trump enabled the abuses of Saudi Arabia’s crown prince
Is Bolt's posturing on this merely for the protection of journalists or a smokescreen for Trump? Trump certainly doesn't seem to see this even as a hiccup in his relationship with the Prince.
Bolt made no fuss when journalists were assassinated in Moscow. He made no fuss over assassinations by Israelis of Palestinian journalists simply doing their job. Why is Fox making a bru-ha over this Saudi journalist? " already Trump is backing off the Saudi Crown Prince:"Bolt
Do the posts above even suggest Trump is backing off the Saudi Prince? I hardly think so.
It goes to show how little research Bolt does to cast his opinions and how constructed and theatrical his are. Murdoch media are the ones Bolt's sticking with what a loyal parrot he is. However, it's all tongue in cheek because Trump isn't offended and is still spending an inordinate amount of time on the platform Murdoch offers him.
Bolt is one step away from a socialist universal education system where the state doesn't fund "private " Education at all. Focuses on "education" and not on all the peripherals that surround it today such as sports, music cadets etc. Education is the starting point where individuals ought to be given choice and provided with true equity of opportunity and meritocracy really exists. Take away the non-educational funding and focus on teaching as a career and the economy of scale should enable an affordable system where attention is on individuals as it is in Scandinavian Countries that have by their outcomes that a far greater socialist model of 'free education' is the best. Since Abbott came to power Australia has fallen to 39th out of 41 OECD countries in comparing outcomes. The very thought of religious freedoms isn't discussed and private schools are private.
It's amazing Bolt never raises the fact that a socialist model in a Democratic Socialist nation allows more freedom than Australia offers for individuals as here even our government schools aren't 'safe'.
Listening to Trump above it seems he doesn't think so.Wash. Post: How Trump enabled the abuses of Saudi Arabia’s crown prince
Is Bolt's posturing on this merely for the protection of journalists or a smokescreen for Trump? Trump certainly doesn't seem to see this even as a hiccup in his relationship with the Prince.
Bolt made no fuss when journalists were assassinated in Moscow. He made no fuss over assassinations by Israelis of Palestinian journalists simply doing their job. Why is Fox making a bru-ha over this Saudi journalist? " already Trump is backing off the Saudi Crown Prince:"Bolt
Do the posts above even suggest Trump is backing off the Saudi Prince? I hardly think so.
It goes to show how little research Bolt does to cast his opinions and how constructed and theatrical his are. Murdoch media are the ones Bolt's sticking with what a loyal parrot he is. However, it's all tongue in cheek because Trump isn't offended and is still spending an inordinate amount of time on the platform Murdoch offers him.
MORRISON BETTER LATE THAN NEVER
Scott Morrison on Wednesday, responding to a report on religious freedom: "Asked whether he believed it was fair for a gay student to be turned away, Mr Morrison said: 'Well it’s the existing law.'. Today the belated correction: Morrison will ban religions schools from rejecting gay students. He's getting caught flat-footed on culture wars.
Bolt is one step away from a socialist universal education system where the state doesn't fund "private " Education at all. Focuses on "education" and not on all the peripherals that surround it today such as sports, music cadets etc. Education is the starting point where individuals ought to be given choice and provided with true equity of opportunity and meritocracy really exists. Take away the non-educational funding and focus on teaching as a career and the economy of scale should enable an affordable system where attention is on individuals as it is in Scandinavian Countries that have by their outcomes that a far greater socialist model of 'free education' is the best. Since Abbott came to power Australia has fallen to 39th out of 41 OECD countries in comparing outcomes. The very thought of religious freedoms isn't discussed and private schools are private.
It's amazing Bolt never raises the fact that a socialist model in a Democratic Socialist nation allows more freedom than Australia offers for individuals as here even our government schools aren't 'safe'.
The US Supreme Court may be undermined for years to come
Brett Kavanaugh will ban abortion, and do it single-handedly on a Supreme Court of nine judges. "Bolt
As if all these judges aren't beholden to the members of congress and the President that appointed them. The rich will simply be able to do what the rich and wealthy have always done fly somewhere and have the procedures done the poor and particularly will be relegated to that role that has always ensured the system doesn't allow all women to have a choice. It's what makes the reversal of Wade and Roe so important.
No comments:
Post a Comment