Fighting Fake News with REAL,21/11/19; Corruption EVERYWHERE but nobody jailed; Donald Trump will throw Giuliani under the bus; Westpac a law unto it's own;; Media bullshit and false pride;

 

 

'Everyone was in the loop': Ambassador confirms quid pro quo in bombshell testimony

The US ambassador to the European Union confirmed there was an explicit 'quid pro quo' linking a White House visit to politically motivated investigations.

1. 

   Trump 'wanted nothing' from Ukranians, but US ambassador testifies otherwise

   
   

   Donald Trump SAYS he wanted 'nothing' from Ukrainians as US ambassador Gordon Sondland says otherwise at the impeachment hearing

   The US ambassador to the European Union, Gordon Sondland, tells an impeachment hearing that he was following the orders of President Donald Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani in seeking a "quid pro quo" from Ukraine.

 

'Disgusted and appalled': Westpac chief vows to lead scandal response

Westpac chief executive Brian Hartzer has rejected claims the bank's senior management was indifferent to the risks that triggered a massive money laundering scandal.

When Corporations commit crimes nobody is ever jailed even if they commit millions of them and cost the nation Billions which the corporation profits from. They are the UNTOUCHABLES and have been since colonisation.

Spectacular failure: This is one scandal Westpac can't play down

How to pay $20 million tax on more than $1 billion in revenue — ask Amazon Australia

 

 

FAKE AND TWISTED NEWS

'ABORIGINAL HISTORIAN' BRUCE PASCOE REPLIES, BUT HIS DARK EMU LOOKS SICKER

COLUMN   Finally! “Aboriginal author” Bruce Pascoe replies to my questions about his identity and bizarre book, Dark Emu. ABC presenters also responded after I asked why their ABC will run a TV series starring Pascoe and his anti-white “history”. But they’ve just made this farce worse, and now comes more evidence of how badly Pascoe misquotes his "sources". 

4m ago

Firstly Bolt's Identity political history may well be "white" but Pascoe's isn't and ant-white history it's history a revision thereof and history isn't as fixed as Andrew Bolt appears to think it is. Secondly, there is nobody who misquotes sources his sources more than Andrew Bolt or dedicates his time looking for sources that only support his arguments without fact-checking them.
Bolt's personal and biased view of history had him almost sued unless he admitted to fabricating it. His ex-fiance was prepared to challenge Bolt in court unless he walked back on his Walter Mitty tale and he did blame his wife for his lies. That's the fantasist we hear bragging each day that he knows and you don't.
Bolt cuts and pastes the works of others like Professor Kench the marine biologist fro NZ. Kench's conclusions are meant to oceans aren't rising and Kiribati and Tuvalu aren't in any imminent danger. If one reads Kench you find he says nothing of the sort that his research spans a period of time that in no way guarantees that things are changing now. Bolt ignores all of Kench's qualifications as they don't suit his argument. There are fewer cyclones according to Bolt, therefore, less danger and damage than previously. Yet Insurance company actuaries reflect an entirely different scenario requiring premiums to go up not down if one were to believe Andrew Bolt. In fact, the government wants all taxpayers across Australia to subsidize those living in the danger zone.
No fact-checking for Andrew Bolt when he promotes a film on the Great Barrier Reef and how it's improving and not dying the scientist and her work claims the IPA has misquoted her work entirely and not only that filmed their bullshit in different locations from her research need I go on to prove Andrew Bolt is a huckster chasing ratings maybe but never the truth.
If Dr Andy Pitman wants to correct a verbal error he made do you think Andrew Bolt allows him the courtesy of the correction which makes Bolt look bad? Not on your life!! Pitman overlooked the word "direct" when discussing global warming and drought. That instead of no connection between warming and drought been found he meant to say what is a far more sceptics response no "direct" connection found. Bolt's pig-headed arrogance had him say " Pitman only said this when he thought I (Andrew Bolt) wasn't listening. Yes Bolt has a privileged position but that position doesn't make his opinions a reflection of reality or history.

TONIGHT: THE VERY STRANGE CASE OF CONSTABLE WALKER

On The Bolt Report on Sky at 7pm: the strange case of Constable Zachary Walker, charged with murder. Was he charged for what he actually did, or charged for what he is: a white policeman? Step by step through this case, which has already caused one official to resign. Plus Cory Bernardi says goodbye.

35m ago

There is no "strange" case of Constable Walker there is the case "against" him due to the evidence collected by the police.
No surprise that Andrew Bolt who rails against identity politics actually raises it here together with his favourite subtext that reverse Racism exists and it's being applied in the NT against Constable Walker the victim and not the just a case of murder brought by the Police and accepted by the NT DPP.
Bolt has brought up the spectre of identity politics not for the first time mind you but simply flipping White Racism which has existed in Australia since the British Colony was formed. No doubt the Myall Creek Massacre was a case of white men hanged and victimized as well.
Bolt doesn't simply ask questions but states a biased and underlying opinion without any knowledge of the facts. His is propaganda via fantasy lacking any want of truth. Everything according to Bolt is subjective and the battle for the narrative is his to win despite any social reality.