Fighting Fake News with REAL,1/12/19 Murdochian Trash pollutes Australia; Media Pollution is in your face; The Inglorious truth of British History revealed in India the West Indies, Africa etc but Australia according to some idiots was an Exception;

 The Australian must be held to account - » The Australian Independent Media Network

During the week, the increasingly ridiculous Murdoch rag, The Australian, published yet another article by the Coalition’s tame climate change denier, Ian Plimer.

Alexis Berg, Associate Research Scholar, Princeton University: “Just like previous pieces by the same author, this piece is an unorganised collection of the same old misleading “arguments” from climate change deniers that have been addressed thousands of times before.  It is frankly appalling that any newspaper that would like to retain some credibility would continue to publish such pieces.”
It’s time The UnAustralian was held to account for their deliberate and destructive campaign to mislead the Australian people about this existential threat.
If we want to talk about “ensuring integrity”, then the Murdoch media would be a great place to start.

 

A Fact you never heard from Peter Dutton that  African's from Victoria have invaded Qld. (ODT)

Almost 25,000 knife-related crimes committed in Queensland last financial year

1. A dramatic rise in young people carrying knives prompts a Logan detective to start a campaign warning of the risks, with new statewide figures showing a 40 per cent increase in knife-related crimes.
   
   

   This in Peter Dutton's State and not in Victoria, what a surprise? (ODT)

Top Stories  ABC and CH9 How they headline and event

ABC

 

 Prison rehabilitation expert identified as victim of London Bridge attack

1. One of the two people killed by a knifeman during an attack at London Bridge is named as 25-year-old Jack Merritt, a Cambridge University graduate remembered as a "champion for underdogs everywhere".
   
   
   

   A convicted murderer on day release was hero who tackled London terrorist

   CH9 

    

   'He's no hero': Man who helped stop London Bridge terrorist a murderer.

   
   

"He is not a hero. He is a murderer out on day release, which us as a family didn't know anything about. He murdered a disabled girl. He is not a hero, absolutely not," Amanda's aunt, Angela Cox, told the Daily Mail on Friday. "I don't care what he's done today, he's a murderer," she said.

"Yes, he did something nice, but that doesn't make up for what he has done. He's not a hero, and he never will be," Cox told BBC News on Saturday.
We heard this attitude expressed so often by media commentators like Andrew Bolt, yet when he was convicted of Racial vilification himself, he claims the law got it wrong. Is it any wonder these attitudes, in fact, encourage recidivism and serving time for a crime is enabled by beliefs fostered like this in the community. The media, in this case, like Bolt amplify that people who have committed a crime should never be forgiven even if they served the prescribed time.
However, not so in Norway and other Scandanavian countries where the recidivism rate is much lower and rehabilitation the focus. One needs to ask why a murderer can't be a hero? Why has the media created this headline rather than what Ford did to prevent a terrorist from doing further harm? Afterall he did something "more than nice".

FAKE AND TWISTED NEWS

THIS 'TELLING' EVIDENCE AGAINST ME DOESN'T HELP PASCOE AT ALL

The Saturday Paper's Rick Morton is ignorant and deceptive in defending Bruce Pascoe: "Tellingly, after mocking an account he questions about animal yards in an Indigenous settlement I went to Bolt with an actual account of one quoted verbatim that IS IN DARK EMU, and he responds: 'Maybe they were animal pens, who knows?'" Here's the truth.

30/11/2019

40

Rick Morton

@SquigglyRick

·

13h

  https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/news/media/2019/11/30/bolt-pascoe-and-the-culture-wars/15750324009163
" There is one particular question Andrew Bolt does not wish to answer....he has read Bruce Pascoe’s best-selling history of Aboriginal Australia, Dark Emu. Each time, he evaded the question."
Perhaps it's the reason Bolt tends to attack the man rather than debate the work or what he said. Bolt did that with Adam Goodes as well when he found a groundswell of protest telling him what Goodes actually said, and in the context, it was all said rather than Bolt's cut and paste ignorance put on display.
Bolt's, never to be forgotten, fact that he was found guilty of Racial vilification lurks behind the attack on Pascoe who openly admits."

“The people he(Bolt) attacked for this crime, however, had an unfortunate thing in common: their credentials were impeccable. Any good reporter could pick up the phone and talk to their mothers about their Aboriginality until the chooks go to roost.

“If I had been part of the group who took Bolt to court for impugning their heritage, he would have had a field day.”

Bolt even manages to stuff up this rebuttal! As per my emailed question to him, I don’t claim to have found this information. I quoted it to him and the precise page number on which it appears in Dark Emu. Reading comprehension: nil. 

1) reviewing the original documents and explorer accounts in question. They are – at every instance – quoted verbatim and cited accordingly in an extensive bibliography at the end of Pascoe’s book.
Bolt alleges: "Dark Emu – included incredible misquotations of its sources." What it shows, however, is Bolt has never read the book Pascoe didn't quote Sturt when referring to a "town of 1000" but Mitchell.

2) In his reference to dates, Bolt's is likened to a drunken sailor. When Judge Mordecai Bromberg pronounced Bolt guilty of Racial Vilification, he also found him guilty of slack and lazy journalism. Someone who had no care for facts but only his own ends as he's doing here. Trying to protect White Colonial History from its more than possible denial.

Amazing having spent so much energy attacking the likes of Bruce Pascoe and Adam Goodes as men dubious character along with others all Bolt has to offer is "
 “Trust you to attempt to make this about me and not his incredible claims.” doing what Bolt does time and again FLIP the argument to make out he's the victim and Morton is the aggressor.

This telling evidence against Andrew Bolt Chris Kenny and others does indeed help Pascoe as his claims have stood the test and evidence found by others since.

On Wednesday, Marcia Langton replied to Josephine Cashman on Twitter. The two were previously close.

“The critique of Dark Emu is a job for actual historians not Andrew Bolt & others who benefit financially from tearing apart the lives of people looking for family,” she said.

A RACIST QUESTION

Is it racist not to believe a white man who says he's Aboriginal? Or is it racist not to believe the Aborigines who say he isn't? Asking for a friend. 

 Andrew Bolt is a reductionist saying Pascoe has no Aboriginality because he hasn't the right documentation. When is a "heap of beans" a "heap of beans" Andrew Bolt? Is it 1 bean?,2,3,4, or----25 beans? Who chooses the tipping point when several beans become a "heap"? Andrew Bolt thinks he is judge and jury. He thought he had that right when convicted of racial vilification as well. Like Hitler had the right to define who was and who wasn't a Jew. In much the same way he hasn't any right to judge Pascoe at all. Besides, it's Pascoe's work that is and should be debated not the man.
  If that were the case, could it be argued, what Bolt never addresses, is that he is a Nazi because of his heritage and connection to Aalsmeer. It's well documented. Oh, it's not an issue of race, but then neither is Judaism, but Hitler certainly made Judaism one. So why can't it be said Bolt is a Nazi? Simply saying no won't cut it.

PASCOE FOOLED MORTON ABOUT ABORIGINAL 'TOWNS' OF '1000' PEOPLE

The Saturday Paper's Rick Morton made gross errors in defending Dark Emu author Bruce Pascoe from my criticism that he wrote fake history and made dodgy claims that he was Aboriginal. But in my response yesterday I missed one critical blunder from Morton that proved what he denies - that Pascoe misquoted his sources. Peter O'Brien hasn't missed.

2m ago 

Mitchell's "estimated" of numbers is fair enough. However, not according to Andrew Bolt, so when is a heap, a heap or an estimated 1000, not 1000? A Census report, not a Census report. Is an estimate simply a leap of faith, a Religion? Bolt's demand for absolute exactness doesn't seem to apply to the white man's history. Bolt looks as if he's trying to wriggle out of his embarrassment.
 There are an increasing number of Bruce Pascoe's around along with growing attention and new evidence. The demand for absolute exactness rather than probability is rarely found in history just as an absolute connection between smoking and cancer never has.  Bolt's insistence that human history needs to be based on "fact" rather than probability is counter to any human experience.

It seems rather a rush of desperation in the defence of white men's accumulation of historical "facts" as an exact interpretation of our past. It's ultimate absurdity to tell us history, as written, shouldn't be changed because it's somehow "exact". What Wanker Bolt is when he says " We are in a wild new world where facts do not count, at least to the Left. It's the side and the story."

 Somehow Bolt seems to find it astounding that after 200 years of being told and taught white history that one can find Aborigines that support what they have been taught. Jacinta Price is just an example of the uncertainty of the past that is open to be re-examined when new evidence arises. She's certainly not a reason for denial.  If whites or blacks question the past the only reason is new evidence not simply Bolt's name-calling that they are 'Left'. How shallow is that?
Basically, one needs to ask why has the man so blinkered and has such a tin ear? Bolt is obviously disturbed as he was when his attacks on Adam Goodes showed him up for what he is a denier that any White Colonial Racist system was in place and it's descriptive of our inglorious past.
 Globally British Colonial history has been exposed and is being rewritten about India, the West Indies Africa etc and the exploitation that was involved in so many places but not according to Bolt here in Australia. We as far as Bolt is concerned some marvellous benevolent exception of a British Colonisation quite different from anywhere else. 

Fighting Fake News with REAL,21/11/19; Corruption EVERYWHERE but nobody jailed; Donald Trump will throw Giuliani under the bus; Westpac a law unto it's own;; Media bullshit and false pride;

 

 

'Everyone was in the loop': Ambassador confirms quid pro quo in bombshell testimony

The US ambassador to the European Union confirmed there was an explicit 'quid pro quo' linking a White House visit to politically motivated investigations.

1. 

   Trump 'wanted nothing' from Ukranians, but US ambassador testifies otherwise

   
   

   Donald Trump SAYS he wanted 'nothing' from Ukrainians as US ambassador Gordon Sondland says otherwise at the impeachment hearing

   The US ambassador to the European Union, Gordon Sondland, tells an impeachment hearing that he was following the orders of President Donald Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani in seeking a "quid pro quo" from Ukraine.

 

'Disgusted and appalled': Westpac chief vows to lead scandal response

Westpac chief executive Brian Hartzer has rejected claims the bank's senior management was indifferent to the risks that triggered a massive money laundering scandal.

When Corporations commit crimes nobody is ever jailed even if they commit millions of them and cost the nation Billions which the corporation profits from. They are the UNTOUCHABLES and have been since colonisation.

Spectacular failure: This is one scandal Westpac can't play down

How to pay $20 million tax on more than $1 billion in revenue — ask Amazon Australia

 

 

FAKE AND TWISTED NEWS

'ABORIGINAL HISTORIAN' BRUCE PASCOE REPLIES, BUT HIS DARK EMU LOOKS SICKER

COLUMN   Finally! “Aboriginal author” Bruce Pascoe replies to my questions about his identity and bizarre book, Dark Emu. ABC presenters also responded after I asked why their ABC will run a TV series starring Pascoe and his anti-white “history”. But they’ve just made this farce worse, and now comes more evidence of how badly Pascoe misquotes his "sources". 

4m ago

Firstly Bolt's Identity political history may well be "white" but Pascoe's isn't and ant-white history it's history a revision thereof and history isn't as fixed as Andrew Bolt appears to think it is. Secondly, there is nobody who misquotes sources his sources more than Andrew Bolt or dedicates his time looking for sources that only support his arguments without fact-checking them.
Bolt's personal and biased view of history had him almost sued unless he admitted to fabricating it. His ex-fiance was prepared to challenge Bolt in court unless he walked back on his Walter Mitty tale and he did blame his wife for his lies. That's the fantasist we hear bragging each day that he knows and you don't.
Bolt cuts and pastes the works of others like Professor Kench the marine biologist fro NZ. Kench's conclusions are meant to oceans aren't rising and Kiribati and Tuvalu aren't in any imminent danger. If one reads Kench you find he says nothing of the sort that his research spans a period of time that in no way guarantees that things are changing now. Bolt ignores all of Kench's qualifications as they don't suit his argument. There are fewer cyclones according to Bolt, therefore, less danger and damage than previously. Yet Insurance company actuaries reflect an entirely different scenario requiring premiums to go up not down if one were to believe Andrew Bolt. In fact, the government wants all taxpayers across Australia to subsidize those living in the danger zone.
No fact-checking for Andrew Bolt when he promotes a film on the Great Barrier Reef and how it's improving and not dying the scientist and her work claims the IPA has misquoted her work entirely and not only that filmed their bullshit in different locations from her research need I go on to prove Andrew Bolt is a huckster chasing ratings maybe but never the truth.
If Dr Andy Pitman wants to correct a verbal error he made do you think Andrew Bolt allows him the courtesy of the correction which makes Bolt look bad? Not on your life!! Pitman overlooked the word "direct" when discussing global warming and drought. That instead of no connection between warming and drought been found he meant to say what is a far more sceptics response no "direct" connection found. Bolt's pig-headed arrogance had him say " Pitman only said this when he thought I (Andrew Bolt) wasn't listening. Yes Bolt has a privileged position but that position doesn't make his opinions a reflection of reality or history.

TONIGHT: THE VERY STRANGE CASE OF CONSTABLE WALKER

On The Bolt Report on Sky at 7pm: the strange case of Constable Zachary Walker, charged with murder. Was he charged for what he actually did, or charged for what he is: a white policeman? Step by step through this case, which has already caused one official to resign. Plus Cory Bernardi says goodbye.

35m ago

There is no "strange" case of Constable Walker there is the case "against" him due to the evidence collected by the police.
No surprise that Andrew Bolt who rails against identity politics actually raises it here together with his favourite subtext that reverse Racism exists and it's being applied in the NT against Constable Walker the victim and not the just a case of murder brought by the Police and accepted by the NT DPP.
Bolt has brought up the spectre of identity politics not for the first time mind you but simply flipping White Racism which has existed in Australia since the British Colony was formed. No doubt the Myall Creek Massacre was a case of white men hanged and victimized as well.
Bolt doesn't simply ask questions but states a biased and underlying opinion without any knowledge of the facts. His is propaganda via fantasy lacking any want of truth. Everything according to Bolt is subjective and the battle for the narrative is his to win despite any social reality.

Fighting Fake News with REAL; 12/11/19; Rhetorical questions banned from the ABC; LNP Bushfires & McCormack; Australia's Dry Day; No Direct Proof that Climate Change causes lung cancer either; Greens are nuts McCormack is worse; Toxic eqivalence;

Buttrose pulls 'offensive' Q&A episode in Aunt Lydia-style censorship

Jennifer Wilson 11 Nov 2019

If you were labouring under the belief that women are free to express ourselves in 2019, last week’s episode of Q&A should put paid to that.

 The panel consisted of five women and one non-binary person and was chaired by veteran broadcaster and presenter, Fran Kelly. The ABC apparently received over 200 complaints about bad language and what was interpreted by some viewers to be an incitement to violence.
This “incitement” was, in fact, Egyptian-born feminist, journalist and writer Mona Eltahawy asking a rhetorical question about how many rapists we have to kill before men stop raping us. Hardly an incitement to violence, more a profound expression of intolerable frustration at the unwillingness of governments and institutions to adequately protect women and children from sexual assault.
 ABC Managing Director David Anderson declared there would be an investigation into whether the program had breached editorial standards. Chair Ita Buttrose has confirmed that the episode will be pulled from all platforms and will not be repeated. Quite why Ms Buttrose would make this arbitrary decision prior to the commencement of an investigation is something of a mystery.

'Inner-city raving lunatics': Deputy PM's bushfire comments prompt rebuke from mayors 

Michael McCormack says those trying to link climate change and bushfires are "woke greenies" — but mayors from fire-ravaged areas of NSW say there is no doubt in their minds that the devastating blazes tearing through their communities are a result of climate change.

Extreme weather

'Fairly unusual': The day it forgot to rain on Australia

Old hat': Is there a link between climate change and bushfires?

As Sydney braces for its first-ever day of catastrophic fire danger, it's worth recapping what scientists think about the links between bushfire risks and a warming world. Is there a link with climate change?

Australian news

Barnaby Joyce says people who died in NSW fires most likely 'voted for the Green Party'

The former deputy PM was addressing his comments relating to the Greens and their position on backburning when he told Sky News: “The two people who died were most likely people who voted for the Green party.” He was referring to people who died in the bushfires in New South Wales.

FAKE and TWISTED NEWS

 

GREENS GO MAD. BLAME SCOTT MORRISON FOR CLIMATE AND FIRES

 The Greens claim global warming is causing the NSW fires, and blame Prime Minister Scott Morrison personally. Here's the science that shows their claim is sick and so wrong that it's deranged. The Greens are just exploiting a tragedy to peddle a fake scare and a fake cure. My editorial from The Bolt Report.

5m ago

 How massive is Bolt's ego? Declaring "What Pitman said when he thought I was, wasn't listening"" Bolt doesn't mention California why? He does, however, the cold snap on the East coast Coldest weather on record in America"  With a collection of media grabs rattled off at speed Bolt attacks Warmists for their "cut and paste" efforts to support Global Warming. Andrew Bolt is the "fool" when he makes out that Global Warming is a single factor that can be denied when it comes to bushfires. However, as far as science is concerned, Warming isn't a "single cause". It's always been far more complicated than that and trends have indicated "warming" is an indirect addition not to just any single event but a "Trend" that's been occurring globally.
It's ever so easy to ignore California's unprecedented bushfires the worst on record. Or the continued burning of the Amazon. The unique dryness of the Qld rain forest. However, it's not as easy to ignore the TREND to EXTREME weather which is increasing along with warming and emission levels in the atmosphere. Comparing individual events on particular dates just doesn't cut it. PITMAN was right when he corrected himself and omitted the word DIRECT. That there is no "direct" connection between Global Warming and extreme weather just as there is no direct connection between smoking and lung cancer. Bolt has grabbed on Pitman's admitted error like a drowning man onto a straw and has hung onto it like a PITBULL. The same as deniers did working for big Tobacco.
As for the politics, Bant and warming activists are on opposite sides of the fence to Bolt's whose yelling back-patting and cheering on his team of idiots like McCormick ignoring the real Science that takes into account Trends and not just single events.
On Trend, the planet is warming. Bolt was the idiot that spent years telling us it wasn't that planet was cooling. Now even he is admitting at is "slightly" but denies any significant or direct effect on the earth. Science isn't the only discipline that takes into account TRENDS actuaries do to, and Insurance Companies and Business react on those studies and premiums are going up not down which Bolt logic that everything is better should reflect but doesn't. Premiums have gone up not just due to inflation like your medical insurance if you're a smoker. However, because of the indirect effect of Climate Change and the trend in the intensity of extreme weather. Business, finance and global politics are paying attention to these Trends which  Bolt claims should be ignored because "weather is weather" just as they once did "cancer is cancer" denying any connection between smoking and lung cancer. Bolt's preaching isn't stemming the tide of change which like the oceans, is rising. (ODT)

FUEL BUILD-UP SO LETHAL THAT 'WE'RE LOOKING ... AT 1000 DEATHS'

NOT GLOBAL WARMING Top fire expert David Packham says forget global warming. It's the reckless failure to burn-off fuel loads that have turned parts of Australia into death traps. Near Melbourne "we're looking down the barrel in these areas at 1000 deaths". When will we learn? Watch this warning, naming the more dangerous areas, from The Bolt Report.

3h ago

Dare I say Adam Bant agrees what is being said here that our politicians have ignored the effects of the build-up of fuel and other conditions over recent years. States that have also been indirectly affected by Climate Change. Bolt seems to be supporting Bant who said it's time governments stopped ignoring these real issues a stopped saying what we keep hearing so often from politicians and Andrew Bolt " the weather is the weather" and that it's only the "belief" in climate change that makes things SEEM worse rather than are WORSE.
If as Bolt and Abbott claim global warming is good, it accelerates green growth then here is Bolt saying the increased fuel-ready to burn is the result of Climate Change coupled with politicians ignoring the fact. The wind patterns in our weather don't operate in isolation either. Greens don't "benefit" from bushfires, but it certainly fuels their arguments more than they do Andrew Bolt's just calling them scaremongers to be ignored.

SURE, ATTACK MEN. BUT WHAT ABOUT 'TOXIC FEMININITY'?

Another week, another bunch of headlines attacking "toxic masculinity". But no one talks about "toxic femininity". Well, Daisy Cousens did on The Bolt Report.

10m ago

 Reverse Genderism and Systemic Feminism don't exist but an understandable reaction to Systemic and "toxic masculinity" does. It's reflected in all our institutions whereas Bolt's "toxic femininity" the reaction anger and the demand for change isn't the same. There isn't even an equivalence. One wonders why Bolt even tries to stir the pot other than to maintain the status quo. We have heard him complaining that he's the only breadwinner in his family. Yes whinging that he had to take his family on holiday. That's what Bolt deems female domestic violence is and it's equivalent to male.
Bolt's been on a crusade for over a week now on a daily campaign to denigrate 5 women who appeared on Q&A and the ABC a moronic campaign of abuse of Fran Kelly largely claiming her incompetence her fear when radical women get together they spew "toxic feminity". The "toxic feminity" if it at all exists is the Victorian attitudes and mindset Daisy Cousen's parodies. That no longer really exist in modern-day Australia It's unusual to see a union of 5 women on the show that certainly is a threat to the dominance of men running Bolt's little overproduced obsolete production that supported News Corp's $306 mill quarterly loss. Bolt's in the business of promoting himself as sooo much better than Fran Kelly.
Let's rmind ourselves he tried to do that to Miranda Divine and was sent packing so much so he's no longer got a radio gig.

Fighting Fake News with REAL,6/11/19; A real Hard Day at the Office for Trump; There's nothing Free in Free Trade Ageements; Killing the news; America is a mercenary state for hire robbing it's citizens and other countries for private interest; Banana Republics are now Oil Republicss

Politics

Republicans Go Mute After Latest Ukraine Bombshell

They'd rather not discuss the stunning reversal by a top Trump diplomat confirming a quid pro quo involving aid to Ukraine.

 

Politics

Trump’s Phone And Calendar Records Support Woman's Sexual Assault Claim, Lawyer Says

Summer Zervos, a former "Apprentice" contestant, is suing Trump for defamation. She's accused him of forcibly kissing and groping her in 2007.

ByDominique Mosbergen

Trade wars

Xi Jinping's unmistakable message for Australia, the US on Chinese technology

China's President has taken an unmistakable swipe at nations like Australia and the US, who have resisted cooperation with Chinese technology companies.

 Chinese President Xi Jinping has used a keynote address at the Chinese International Import Expo in Shanghai to warn countries that they risk stifling innovation if they fail to remove barriers and "knowledge blockades" preventing cooperation on technology.




 The Chinese unlike the USA and the United Fruit Company in Guatemala when the US government via CIA ensured the private interests of an American corporation were secured. With the use of public money the overthrow of Guatemala's duly elected Socialist Government was organized. We saw the same occur in Chile Panama and the failed attempt in Nicaragua. This century we witnessed the invasion of Iraq which guaranteed Exxon's control of the Iraqi Oil Fields. China has not done any of that. Currently, the USA is shipping 30 mill barrels of oil a month out of Syria and who has that contract? The betrayal and displacement of the Kurds was to ensure America controlled the oil. The US army hasn't left Syria as Trump has said it did. All this fake pull out was simply a smokescreen so that neither the Kurds nor Syrians could control that resource. However, Trump has shot himself in the proverbial foot because without the Kurds the Americans are left blind on the ground in terms of any intelligence.
 Thanks to China it seems the Blue Dot Network is little more than the Americans being forced to curtail their usual practice of destroying governments in order to assist private multinationals into places like Venezuela Iran, Yemen Libya Cuba not simply for their political ideologies but their resources. Corporations via Citizens United have been doing deals with US governments for their shareholders alone for decades using citizens money. Lobbying, bribing , promising politicians jobs on retirement and buying them at will. Genie Oil is in Israeli occupied territory of Syria's Golan Heights Rupert Murdoch is a director. These are the real voices who are complaining about China's Soft Diplomacy.  Today the public voice of Trump can be saying. "We should simply take their oil" when in fact the American government isn't taking over anything. They are mercenaries working for multinational companies like Exxon. Today the term "Banana Republics" has changed to the " Oil Republics" that's all.  (ODT)

via China's 'Belt and Road' strategy has a new competitor — enter America's 'Blue Dot Network' - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

 

Fake and Twisted News

  The Fraud calls the 2 ABCs frauds by disguising them as 1 ABC in his blog. The intent is clear as  Fox/Trump distortion statement.

AMY ROBACH: ABC KILLED EPSTEIN STORY

First Ronan Farrow claimed- with reason - that NBC suppressed his reporting on sexual assault allegations against Harvey Weinstein and covered up assault accusations against NBC’s former star, Matt Lauer. Now ABC anchor Amy Robach on a hot mic says ABC quashed her reporting on serial pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his mate, Prince Andrew. Watch.  

Has anyone wondered why Andrew Bolt is the Dorothy Dixer of Australian Media. America has an ABC and what an opportunity there is here to confuse ours with theirs put up 2 banners and create confusion. 

Andrew Bolt is given full-page bylines twice a week in our least trusted Murdoch Press along with an hour on Sky News after Dark. Trivia, distraction deflection can be found in the media's least trusted and greatest waste of space that's simply withstood the pace of time. What the Truth once did for Melbourne once a week was taken over by Murdoch dailies. There is no news today has been a song sang to drag our attention away from the most trusted media source in the country OUR ABC.

 Bolt tells us in his corner newsboy style street calling headline blog what we can find in his corner of the companies news. Fashion to distract, a daily reminder that the evil ABC are not like him whic,h is just flag waving for Murdoch. His mate Tony has been slurred so shit someone ought to be sacked. Andrew even lets us know that unlike him, other media withhold the news.  Yet, Bolt rarely mentions Trump only the current President of the USA and the current shitstorm that surrounds him, why? Because Murdoch media is paid to kill the TRUMP STORY.

Fox News reportedly killed Stormy Daniels story to help Trump ...