More posts
Why is it that Bolt fails to reveal the silent word one which he avoids like the plague is Global Warming Science. We are all aware Bolt's Weltenschung is so so small and narrow that he believe he is one of the few true indigenous Australians. Bolt simply doesn't share his world readily with anyone. He competes for it and wants to be the master of it. Others are just objects in his world with which he agrees or disagrees simply on their interests. Should he disagree strongly with anyone he'd prefer them removed. Science as a method of attempting to gain knowledge is always knowledge not in a free market of equal individuals but an established one built on inheritance of wealth and property rights.
For Bolt science is just another activity dominated by the interests of men whose hierarchy has already been established and shouldn't be a criticism of it. Evolution not revolution is the only way forward. So no Global Warming Science isn't settled because if true would lead to the necessiity of drastic change and even the redistribution of wealth necessary to create that level playing field Bolt calls a free market. The very notion of private property deemed obsolete. So put simply Global Science can never be regarded as settled as it's counter intuitive to any notion of private property and the established of what Bolt regards as the natural inequality humans.
On
The Bolt Report on Sky at 7pm: a new report exposes the
Labor con - that South Australia was blacked out just because a storm
blew over transmissions towers.
Wind farms may in fact be to blame.
Plus: one of Malcolm Turnbull's key backers on reports that Tony Abbott
reckons he could come back.
When Andrew Bolt sprinkles the words 'alleged 'and 'may ' around like confetti you know he operates in the legal grey zone protecting himself by not declaring it reality. His commentary is best seen through the virtual worlds of possibility only rather than fact. A truth free zone if you like. Should he be proven wrong he doesn't apologize he just leaves it behind to encourage doubt and move on.
"On the show: Minister Scott Ryan, Mark Latham, Rita Panahi and Catherine McGregor." This is Bolt's panel who if you add the producer, represented by Bolt's protective ear phone, how can it for a moment called balanced with a slogan "No Foul No Favour"? The Drum not only has Bolt's favorites on like Rowan Dean, Shari Markam, pairs them with Women in Hijabs and men with clerical collars and tries to produce a dialectic. The Bolt Report fails on every level when it comes to information.
It's typical isn't it Abbott's most significant Department the ABF in it's time in office has gone on strike and has also been caught out facilitating the smuggling of drugs. But what is fact and what is fiction in the case of Ruben Majok Aleer Aguer has yet to be proved. Andrew Bolt's Kangaroo court certainly says he's guilty he has no time for British justice to take it's course. If Bolt is proved wrong he won't apologize. The kicker if you want to follow Bolt's source down his rabbit hole you need to subscribe to the Herald Sun's wonderland.
1-20
of 39001Just show me the $$$$ donations to the LibsNo stopping Bolt is there. Transmission towers crash so delivery of power to clients is stopped. The state has an oversupply of energy 0f 2800MW that can't be delivered and Bolt ignores that fact entirely. He is simply the paid spruiker of coal industry politicizing a natural disaster by saying it's the fault of renewables. How many graphs does it take to turn a lie into the truth" ?
Abbott rising
Abbott sticks his neck out and reveals himself .The leader of his media cheer squad Andrew Bolt has an each way bet and plays it safe. Ceasar said he wasn't interested in the leadership but now he is? He can't help himself being a liar is the nature of this beast. Bolt needs to protect him from the fallout of his own making and so calls it a rumour. However if correct it's true. Now hows that for a wimpish each way bet! However lest we forget Abbott last years trip overseas claimed he was invited to an exclusive meeting in Atlanta to meet the president. It turned out he was taken by Murdoch for a photo shoot. He wasn't invited at all.
What is amazing is Fairfax broke the news first not Bolt. Is he the insider he thinks he is or is he just the leading outsider because he's so unbelievable?John Howard: Corporate interests were given top billing
UPDATE
Abbott denies he said there is a good chance he'd be PM again to his Tory friends in the UK Given Abbott and Bolt's track record who do you trust? Fairfax and a reliable Liberal insider or Abbott and Bolt and News Corp the least trusted media organization in the country. After all he said he was invited to a lunch in Atlanta to meet and greet the political elite of the USA. The reality was very different Murdoch took him to do a photo shoot for the Daily Telegraph.
What Bolt does to Africans and Muslims and says it's different.
" The report doesn't say anything about ethnic origin but the pictures tell the story."Bolt
Nothing stops Bolt getting in the way of his Migrant Vilification News . I used to play a game with the kids driving to Lorne spotting VW's called Punch Buggy. Over a period o 10 trips and a couple 100
VW's spotted we too could have come up with a Bolt conclusion that VW's
were invading Lorne rather than there is a lot of summer traffic to the
place. Yes there is a lot of crime in our immigrant nation all of which can be traced to immigrants if we want apart from that committed by Indigenous Australians. We could investigate all the transgressions of those with Dutch heritage since WW2 I'm sur we too could ask "Who let the Bolt's in" Bolt's selective list is meaningless however one could draw the conclusion that 1rst and second generation Australians an immigrants in fact committ less crime than
the rest of Australia as well. So let's just conclude Bolt's list is
meaningless. It simply says there is crime in Australia and it's
committed by humans.
When push comes to shove the Christians really don't mess about do they
Bolt
call is SBS should be more commercial. When it does become so he
criticizes that as well. Bolt's program on Sky wouldn't have a snow
flakes chance in hell if it wasn't subsidized. It's audience could
hardly support it's production costs. It's why Bolt hasn't fully
transferred there. However let the public decide because all the
programs mentioned here don't represent the total content of SBS2.
What
we do learn from public media however is something Bolt doesn't tell us
that Clinton is ahead of Trump by 6pts and 29 of 33 major News Papers
including Republican papers are now supporting her for President. Now
that's News and it's not the trash Bolt sells.
Bolt and his sweeping generalizations. He even does it on alleged cases and rumor. Draw your sweeping generalization about Conservative right wing commentators in suits who work for News Corp. Can any likely generalizations be drawn after listening to Bolt, Murray, Hannity, O'Rielly? Are they stereotypical? When it comes
to race Bolt ignores history and selects individual events that simply
depict his narrative that Blacks were never victims of racism until
Obama became President and tha the real victims are white. Bolt would
love to be a black man in the USA given they have the power to control
the streets. It's why on the ABC's Recognition Yes or No the ex PM of
NZ a conservative even laughed at him. Bolt is such a loser taking the
Fox News line. Just how many Afro Americans have been killed for little
more than the color of their skin? I guess the KKK in the states was
always just a myth.
