Andrew bolt's Blog, 5/9/15; Bolt Proves we are ruled by a fascist state; Abbott knows Canning can't be about him; ABC and Tony: Bolt and others squabble about their dud LNP team; Bolt's disgusting use of a 3 year old boy; China FTA media distortion;Bolt Bias strategy:
A tale of systemic racism in Australia. Denial of Andrew Bolt and his blaming of Aboriginal Culture.
What Bolt fails to mention is the majority of Syrians didn't move far. Australia and the UK are racing to the bottom of "humanitarian aid" Bolt's little schoolboy map fails to explain the real story. Why after Muslim countries has Germany the most compassion ready to take 800,000 Syrians approx 1% of it's population. Could this bring about the end of the EU as there is no union on the matter.
Links News Corp Paywall Peter Fray & John Lyons
Complaining about the unfairness of Fairfax for reporting the general public's opposition to the ABF Farce . In future The media need to appear to be stenographers and should not engage in questioning the wisdom or lack of, of events. Bolt again is running the Peter Dutton position and crying foul. Tony Abbott on the other hand believes they are both a load of crock. If you want good media you need to be a good government it's as simple as that and Abbott has said it publicly time and again when in opposition.
"Fairfax didn’t in fact have the decency to apologise" Any errors according to troll Peter BH require a large amount kow-towing in order to be convincing in his eyes and be received in his true holier than thou Australian cultural style of your wrong so lick my arse.
John Lyons who Bolt has called the liar and bull crapper and non- journo at the Australian is now his source. All is obviously forgotten about what was previously said Abbout Abbott wanting to fully invade Iraq again. He'll just have to settle for bombing Syria for Canning. The lack of the media being like Hansard is the fault and influence of the twitterati. What's happening is Bolt and Dutton bemoan the past when the media had more control over the narrative like in the good old days of Goebbels. When the press and government could walk hand in hand. It's bad because the Twittersphere in a sense is creating the loss of business and influence once held in the news and commentary cycle.
"Bruns, from QUT’s Digital Media Research Centre, ... rejects the
commonly stated claim that Twitter is skewed to the young and the Left."
" So, yes, younger, and what is the dominant politics of the media/PR/advertsing and political class?" Bolt
Bolt basically believe all institutions and dominant professional classes have been captured by the left. Which goes to prove we are being ruled by a minority but fascist government with little control over anything. One only working for the 1% of the population and the mega transnational corporate class. The government has nothing to do with Australian citizens other than keeping under control. They only become punters of seeming importance once every 3 years.
Links The Coversation Michelle Grattan, News Corp Paywall Chris Kenny, The ABC, Murdoch's Sky News
Let's compare journalistic reputation Bolt vs Grattan no more needs to be said on that score about"tosh". Grattan is saying Abbott doesn't govern for the country he fights politics as if a game to be won for the party and the party alone. He has fought the style of game both in opposition and in government and it's why the country is not being governed and is stagnating. Bolt has highlighted some issues Abbott hasn't chosen to tackle most don't however make him appear good.
It's exactly what Bolt is complaining about. Abbott is too busy trying to select only the fights he can win but should go back to doing what he did best as opposition leader an stay in opposition on everything. Strange, Bolt is suggesting all great leaders were really always in opposition? Would Abbott's 24 poll rating improve for being a bigger arsehole than he is now? Abbott can't even be convincing as John Howard because he's not John Howard. Abbott went to Canning and said I know I'm hated please vote on the issues and not me i'm unimportant. You couldn't be more honest.
So it's back to scaremongering
" The Chinese, if we muck around, will walk away. Bill Shorten will
carry a very heavy responsibility if he tries to obstruct something that
is overwhelmingly in the interests of Australia."
"Who do you trust?" falls apart for Abbott with all his broken promises the convenient jumps to the right coupled with his the lack of any holistic plan
Link News Corp paywall
Bolt is like a sulking schoolboy picking his ring while teasing the kids on the other side of the play ground. They aren't listening. He hates them because they' simply look as if they're getting on with life. What's most important are the real things of the day not just created ones. Strange video to sneak into a topic about book awards.
But then it's about Jonathon Green. Who is right to believe Goebbels would would have tried to stop today's technology but not out of guilt or shame but control. Realizing the impossible he'd need to have been more like ISIS. However Abbott is more a dullard and a man of the past who would like to hide information like Goebbels in order to control his narrative. Hide the mutilation of corpses on the battle field and the secrets in Nauru but can't. He and Hitler are in fact acting in step when it comes to media? However it's the 21st Century and ISIS know it.
Links News Corps paywall Chris Kenny, Niki Savva ; Liberal Dan Tehan MP
The government isn't a football team. However Bolt, Kenny etal all admit the government isn't playing a good game and needs to be changed internally. Why do they support Tony Abbott who among all players is not this government's most positive force. How much smoke-screening has Bolt done for the man in the past 2 months?
We pay and drop bombs and the US does the business. Why war has always been goo for US business both sides use their weapons. Rebels generally use Kalashnikovs their much cheaper and often second hand.
Link ABC, Murdoch's WJS, Ottawa Citizen, Herald Sun, Andrew Bolt, The Age
The one thing guaranteed it's a long blog. It's about refugees. It's long in order to deflect and distort his Racist, Islamophobic, anti-multi cultural stance on on Immigration to Australia . We are apparently not and never have been progressive in being a rainbow nation according to Bolt but rather regressive. Progress for Bolt is to go back in time preferably to the days of mono cultural states . Forced assimilation is the positive policy. To achieve that cultural intervention the method. A war on multiculturalism is Bolt's call.
Firstly when has prohibition of any kind actually succeeded and at what cost. Had the Malaysian solution been ratified when Labour was in power 1200 people would not have drowned they would have been resettled in better conditions than offered today. Not on Manus not on Nauru and not in Cambodia where 4 people have been sent at the cost $14 mill each. We wouldn't have to hear Dutton say it's sad that we have to keep children on Nauru being molested and raped but we need to in order to "stop the boats" which must be done without any transparency because we are so ashamed.
Wars on alcohol, drugs, the Nth Vietnamese, on Iraq, on ISIS, on homosexuality, on pornography, have never been won yet Bolt demands escalating wars of some kind at every turn. Stopping everything of" his choice" and disguising it as our necessity for all our good." deterrence is indeed the best response"has been the most expensive course of action with the worst outcome.
Bolt logic is rationality taken to a level of disgust and revulsion " Fact: Aylan’s family was not “fleeing war or persecution” Bolt never walks in any persons shoes other than his own." The Nauru process has indeed stopped families just like his." The truth being the majority of families on Manus and Nauru have been assessed as genuine refugees. Bolt loves to take single cases and then generalise and apply them to the whole. He does it with Climate Change, Unions, Aborigines etc He looks for anyone that might be regarded as an economic refugee and then he'll apply it as evidence to generalize all asylum seekers. When in fact those arriving here have in the main been declared genuine. Something you wont hear from Bolt. According to Bolt Aylan's family were not running to safety but to relatives and a better economic life in Canada. His proof they were not registered refugees. The moral crime here wasn't the honesty shown by Aylan's grieving father but the lack of compassion by Andrew Bolt. Aylan's family didn't explore all options.
But here's the rub Bolt uses this example to disparage the Australian intake of Lebanese, Afghani, Sudanese basically the intake of Muslims who according to Bolt, using this as an example To halt all intake. He takes minor migrant criminality found in Australia to suggest his "significant minority" for whatever that means is in fact statistically significant. " True, most Muslim immigrants make fine Australians. But a significant minority do not assimilate well or safely. Bolt's "significant minority" which turns out to be in fact statistically insignificant when examined rationally.
Bolt is simply scaremongering for implementing racist policies of the PDL, Reclaim Australia etc. If most are genuine why tar them all with one brush? Most crimes in this country are migrant related given 50% of us have a migrant connection. I'll bet that Afghani buried in Tarcoola was better treated there than by the Dutchman Bolt.Step up and tackle the refuge crisis, Australia
Abbott's Lesson
Links Hawke, Crean, Ferguson, Kelly & Troll Peter BH
John Hewson, Malcolm Fraser were Party traitors. Hawke, Crean and Ferguson honourable men Party heroes according to Bolt. Can you believe him. Picked for purpose not for principle. If you have to pick Labor men pick them from the right. If your going to quote Liberal hacks pick them from the right.If your going to want media to support pick them from News Corp they are all right. Never the principle always the side. That's Andrew Bolt. Did anybody notice how Rupert wants a snap election does Rupert always get what he wants? Labor is ready. Rupert simply believes it can't get any worse as far as he's concerned. He need a new senate and obliging government and that's all.
Ferguson talks of mythical potential industries without naming them. Hawke is always ready to be bipartisan however it's Abbott who never is it takes two to tango. If Hawke were leader of Labor now Abbott wouldn't dance. For Crean it's growth at any cost and he's selling the" trickle down effect " which has been shown to be just crumbs for workers. Even Crean says there's "misunderstanding on the issue of the 457 visas" That's what Shorten wants to iron out because he knows Abbott is only playing the political win game. There's enough corruption on 457 visas now to question further blind acceptance and expansion into the future. However that's what Abbott wants to fight about it's not about the FTA it's about Canning and the politics of winning fuck Australia and Abbott has picked his fight. Besides the FTA was always Labor's all Abbott has done has dipped his pen in the ink.
The position of the Labor right has always been compromise we can iron out things later. That might be Ok for side issues but work relations which is the heart and soul of the labor party the workers. Those who have no capital but only their labor to sell and it's value to get by on.
"Let’s get the facts on the table, we’ve got a process to do it, but
down the track these are issues capable of being resolved, but most
importantly, the agreement needs to be ratified, needs to be signed and
it needs to be done this year." Paul Kelly
Paul Kelly is whispering like the proverbial rapist "Let me put it in a little if it hurts I'll take it out. Really it's for both our benefit" The chance of this promise being kept and of mutual benefit for all is what Shorten wants to nail down. He knows Abbott history and he wont abide by it but just want more . Yes it's all about Tony Abbott and his ideological intent from the get go if he was dealing with Malcolm it might be quite a different story but it's Tony Abbott.
A single picture selected to smear. Had it been a picture of women and children. Bolt would have said. " see how many single mothers their are that will demand social welfare. If it was a picture of the elderly " see how many unproductive people there are. Every picture is a chance to Bolt slag
No comments:
Post a Comment