Should Hanson really be bashed into silence?
" It’s not Hanson who is costing us that $1 million in police protection. It’s the Islamists and Leftist who threaten to bash and kill her." Bolt
Islamists weren't around when Hanson was last an MP. The only protection she needed wasn't from the left it was from Tony Abbott who contrived a scheme to have her thrown in jail. Now that's bashing. That was the only real assault she experienced and it came from Abbott acting as John Howard's hit man. It enabled him to grab Hanson's policies and end her career. Bolt simply can't get his facts or context straight can he. Tony Abbott even made a public apology which Bolt has buried.
Abbott did it
Hyperbolic abuse from ACMA and the Age when they can’t fault my warming facts
The intention of Bolt's lengthy blog is to confuse nothing more nothing less. Bolt has constantly said the planet hasn't been warming an in fact has been cooling for the past 18 years. Global scientists have shown that Bolt using Spencer's denial have simply been wrong, Spencer was wrong.Revamped satellite data shows no pause in global warming - Phys.or Bolt will have a hard time insisting no warming has taken place for 18 years the best he can do is say no significant warming had taken place Study drives a sixth nail into the global warming 'pause' myth |
" Research reported in July 2015 on an updated NOAA dataset casts doubt on the existence of a hiatus, and it finds no indication of a slowdown even in earlier years. Scientists working on other datasets welcomed this study, though they have expressed they view that the recent warming trend was less than in previous periods of the same length] Subsequently, a detailed study supports the conclusion that warming is continuing, but it also find there was less warming between 2001 and 2010 than climate models had predicted, and that this slowdown might be attributed to short-term variations in the Pacific decadal oscillation (PDO), which was negative during that period. Another review finds "no substantive evidence" of a pause in global warming A statistical study of global temperature data since 1970 concludes that the term 'hiatus' or 'pause' is not justified.Independent of these discussions about data and measurements for earlier years, 2015 turned out to be much warmer than any of the earlier years, already before El Niño conditions started. The warmth of 2015 largely ended any remaining scientific credibility of claims that the supposed "hiatus" since 1998 had any significance for the long term warming trend."
As I said Bolt is simply providing a long rant to confuse
"I don't know what
Cruz, et al., will do now," Dessler said in an email. "I think it will
be increasingly difficult for them to claim that the satellite data show now warming, although it may be possible to say that it shows 'no significant warming.'"
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2016-03-revamped-satellite-global.html#jCp
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2016-03-revamped-satellite-global.html#jCp
"I don't know what
Cruz, et al., will do now," Dessler said in an email. "I think it will
be increasingly difficult for them to claim that the satellite data show now warming, although it may be possible to say that it shows 'no significant warming.'"
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2016-03-revamped-satellite-global.html#jCp
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2016-03-revamped-satellite-global.html#jCp
In Bolt's lengthy defence no mention is made of the specific study he claims is accurate and that support what he has said until now. To say he has never been a denialist is a load of crap. Bolt has been silent this year only because he can no longer say 14 consecutive months of warming and broken records isn't a sign of a trend. Bolt however has never dealt in trends and he tends to spend his energies trying as he does all his arguments to look for exceptions in order to disprove what he claims to be false rules put forward by climate scientists.
That's his very problem like medicine climate science works not on hard and fast rules but probabilities and trends. Bolt like a spruiker for the tobacco industry who argues that there is no proof of a causal connection between smoking and cancer. Bolt argues that there is no evidence for a causal connection man's activities and global warming or even that the planet has been warming. To say anything else is just side stepping the issue. Bolt constantly turned to Spencer's graph to make his point and he has shut up this year.
Clexit: The new heights of climate science denial
Who let them in? Now a spruiker for Hamas, the terrorist group?
Andrew Bolt the spruiker for right wing terrorists in Reclaim Australia, the hypocritical advocate of free speech who does not defend it for others only has the freedom of Australia because he's a citizen. The problem however is he abuses it. He abuses democracy and has no respect for it. There was a time in the past when only the wealthy Protestants ran this country. What changed their monopoly of power was democracy when people and the vote actually meant something and politicians were forced to listen when people demonstrated and took to the streets. Politicians and spruikers like Bolt were a dime a dozen. The problem today is the neocons have no respect for what Bolt claims he wants free speech. All he wants is the protection to deliver hate speech. We know from history when that's allowed democracy has gone and Andrew Bolt symbolizes just that.
IndigenousDads counter Bill Leak cartoon with stories of fatherhood - ABC
News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Lies Americans are told about Universalised Health…. Michael Moore’s ” Sicko”|Right Wing Australia Complains…Movie
Andrew Bolt will lie to you in your face but you have to pay for that lie too.
Sicko – American Healthcare Documentary (2007) – YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thkBLpRwdSM
Mar 15, 2015 – Uploaded by paagleTV
No comments:
Post a Comment