Breaking
Pell Verdict
Cardinal George Pell found guilty of child sex abuse
The former Vatican treasurer and Melbourne Archbishop has been found guilty and is set to be jailed for child sexual abuse in the most sensational verdict since the Catholic church became engulfed in worldwide abuse scandals.
Andrew Bolt's Australian Christ figure found guilty and is now to be sentenced. Will the Church pay for an appeal, at what cost? Will Andrew Bolt continues with his conspiracy theories and fight for his innocence or just call him Indigenous? I'm sure there will be a PAYWALL for people to find out
" He was found guilty in a retrial last December, with the verdict sending shockwaves through the Vatican and around the world. A jury in an earlier trial was discharged, in September, when it was unable to reach a verdict. His legal team will appeal against the conviction."AGE
At what cost far more than the compensation offered victims, a lawyers paradise no doubt 2 trials and an appeal.
It later emerged that victims who sought compensation through the Melbourne Response received far smaller payouts, capped at $50,000 than they would have if they had gone through the courts. The response was criticised for doing more to protect the church and minimise its financial costs than helping victims.
"Pell was stripped of his position as the Vatican’s chief financial officer and expelled from Pope Francis’ inner circle of trusted cardinals known as the Group of Nine, or C-9, shortly after the verdict, but due to the suppression order the world’s media was forced to pretend Pell, 77, stepped down due to his age."
Bolt seems to know all about flimsy evidence more than the judge the jury if there was one and far more than Pell's defence team lead by Robert Richter. But then he's a whizz at science medical and climate, and expert on indigenous culture and the role of women in our society. Was he named singled out and threatened by our courts for his courage to defy the judge by speaking out on Pell's case? Strange he hasn't mentioned how great he was? Certainly, one of the 20 journalists sent letters to by the court. Maybe he wasn't and was the Bolt we have all come to know.
He seems to stand very alone in this country of ours and must feel so un-Australian among the majority of us who believe in British Law over the vigilante kind. He seems to be suggesting because Pell got away with it once he should be let off now. Isn't that Trump law?
Bolt says he stands with Fr Brennon I for one don't believe him because Brennon ultimate conclusion has been " But what is absolutely essential is that the law be allowed to do its work."and that isn't and won't be Andrew Bolt's.
The verdict was unanimous. The jury took three days to deliberate after a four-week trial
" He was found guilty in a retrial last December, with the verdict sending shockwaves through the Vatican and around the world. A jury in an earlier trial was discharged, in September, when it was unable to reach a verdict. His legal team will appeal against the conviction."AGE
At what cost far more than the compensation offered victims, a lawyers paradise no doubt 2 trials and an appeal.
It later emerged that victims who sought compensation through the Melbourne Response received far smaller payouts, capped at $50,000 than they would have if they had gone through the courts. The response was criticised for doing more to protect the church and minimise its financial costs than helping victims.
"Pell was stripped of his position as the Vatican’s chief financial officer and expelled from Pope Francis’ inner circle of trusted cardinals known as the Group of Nine, or C-9, shortly after the verdict, but due to the suppression order the world’s media was forced to pretend Pell, 77, stepped down due to his age."
Bolt seems to know all about flimsy evidence more than the judge the jury if there was one and far more than Pell's defence team lead by Robert Richter. But then he's a whizz at science medical and climate, and expert on indigenous culture and the role of women in our society. Was he named singled out and threatened by our courts for his courage to defy the judge by speaking out on Pell's case? Strange he hasn't mentioned how great he was? Certainly, one of the 20 journalists sent letters to by the court. Maybe he wasn't and was the Bolt we have all come to know.
He seems to stand very alone in this country of ours and must feel so un-Australian among the majority of us who believe in British Law over the vigilante kind. He seems to be suggesting because Pell got away with it once he should be let off now. Isn't that Trump law?
Bolt says he stands with Fr Brennon I for one don't believe him because Brennon ultimate conclusion has been " But what is absolutely essential is that the law be allowed to do its work."and that isn't and won't be Andrew Bolt's.
MCQUEEN: SICK OF THE IDENTITY WARRIORS ATTACKING MEN
WHY LIBERALS' GLOBAL WARMING PLAN WON'T WIN ONE VOTE
The response to the Liberals' $2 billion global warming plan shows why it's an argument the Liberals will never win. They will always lose because they haven't dared ask the question that puts Labor on the rack instead. My editorial from The Bolt Report.
WHY LIBERALS' GLOBAL WARMING PLAN WON'T WIN ONE VOTE
The response to the Liberals' $2 billion global warming plan shows why it's an argument the Liberals will never win. They will always lose because they haven't dared ask the question that puts Labor on the rack instead. My editorial from The Bolt Report.
Opinion
This is going to irk Murdoch and dampen the promise of an assisted and quick death to the ABC
ABC
Has Morrison sprung a PR surprise at the right moment? We shall see ...
On the face of, this is a good pick by Scott Morrison and may prove to be an inspired one. We shall see.
No comments:
Post a Comment