A comment never allowed on Bolt's blog
Has anybody noticed just how many PAYWALLS were on Andrew Bolt's previous blog how little work that entailed from Bolt but the size of his production team was Bigger than Ben Hur for which he stole the credit? He did that with his books recently bragging about his sales compared with "lesser" authors at MUP mostly those from the ABC. However, they didn't have the luxury of a PR machine like News Corp behind them when one does a cost sales evaluation on Bolt's sales it's a book on an expenditure of millions with a less than 1% return. A total failure in any publishers eyes but a hero in Bolt's.
PELL VERDICT: WHY I DON'T ACCEPT IT
It's as simple as that he wasn't present at the claimant's 2 days of questioning the court were all there when he gave evidence. He hasn't bothered to investigate the case he has merely indicated that he sides with Fr Brennon. However, not entirely because Fr Brennon's concluding response was "let the courts do their job". His disappointment is irrelevant to our justice system.
Bolts attitude has been that there has been a conspiracy between the police, the media and an incompetent defence all acting in chorus with a broken system.
"Pell, Australia’s most senior Catholic, has been made to pay for the sins of his church and a media campaign of vilification."
Bolt's overwhelming evidence was is that Pell escaped previous accusations that date back to the '60s and that the police had decided to drop two other charges relating to the 70s knowing Pell would most likely be convicted of the current offence in the 90s. There seems to have been a lot of smoke around Pell over 50 plus years.
Pell's defence was of the highest order Robert Richter no less in front of 12 honest Australians under the advice of a highly respected judge, not good enough! Bolt can't, given his history, stand up to the same sort of scrutiny yet he puts himself in a position higher than all of the above and the Australian justice system in this case.
Bolt's been here himself declaring his innocence in the face of being judged guilty by our system of justice. He came close to spitting the dummy because the News Corp legal team failed to persist in defending him. He wouldn't put his hand in his own pocket, would he? A man with a proven record to be a liar in public and to his family Bolt was forced to admit his failing when threatened to be sued. Now he maintains he has overwhelming evidence that the court didn't attend to and ought to be trusted in his opinion and judgement.
Bolt claims Pell is merely a scapegoat and entirely innocent man on all counts even though Bolt wasn't a party to all the evidence presented and the most important of which was in camera. Will Andrew Bolt be now called, rushed, by Pell's defence team to be heard at his appeal the Quixotic hero who will save the day? I don't think so and nor would Pell even want him there. Dream on Bolt The Australian Justice system can't be bought like your much admired American one. Buying The Liberals On Interest-free Terms While Andrew Bolt Tells Us That Courts And Scientists Are Wrong! - » The Australian Independent Media Network
ON GEORGE PELL'S CONVICTION: HOW CAN THIS STAND?
Buying The Liberals On Interest-free Terms While Andrew Bolt Tells Us That Courts And Scientists Are Wrong! - » The Australian Independent Media Network