Links Andrew bolt Pameller Geller USA's foremost Islam-Hater
Bolt and his News Corp associate Panahi have published the promo photos published by ISIS. The very photos we assume ISIS wants the world to see. If Bolt is assisting the delivery of those photos and therefore the ISIS message how the hell can he deny he and Abbott combined aren't their biggest public promoters.
Bolt has turned his back on not only Australian Jews but Jewery worldwide by supporting the inappropriate and most cretinous comment made by any Prime Minister in the world today. The Nazis who systemically as a sovereign state rounded up and killed 6 million Jews and Abbott declared them less evil than ISIS a band of renegade thugs struggling for a position in the Middle East. They have to date killed 3500. Bolt and Abbott are somehow under the misapprehension that the Nazis were "ashamed" and sorry for their actions and hid them from the worlds press.
Does Bolt and Abbott really believe Hitler and Goebbels would not have used a 24 hour media cycle the internet and social media to spread their message to the world if they had the technology? Both Abbott and he are more stupid than we ever thought. Do they think the Japanese would have kept their doings secret their message of fear silent? ISIS is only unique because they have access to modern technology that Hitler the Japanese and Idi Amin didn't have. If the world had the technology the US would have used any way they could to scare the shit out of the Nth Vietnamese shame aside. They didn't worry about dropping the second nuclear bomb after the world saw what happened with the first. No shame there.
If you put Abbott his cabinet and all the News Corp drones together they'd add up to less than half a brain. The medium is the message and Abbott believing Hitler, Stalin, Franco, Mao, Pol Pot, etal and their followers were to ashamed to use it then he's a greater dumb fuck and danger than we ever imagined. An apology wouldn't any longer cut it.
" what way does Tony Abbott “exaggerate their evil”?" He suggested worlds worst mass murderers with shame!!! That's total exaggeration and a lack of historical intelligence
Links 1 Andrew Bolt, 2 Herald Sun, 3 Blocked 4 Andrew Bolt
Melbourne's Jews beg to differ Andrew Bolt. However you are an instant apologist for Tony Abbott. So much so as to suggest the Jews of Australia are wrong. Are they now committing Jihad against Abbott or is Fairfax making up their reaction. Make your self clear you can't have it both ways.
Fairfax is reporting on the Jewish reaction not constructing it. Bolt even suggests Jews don't have the intelligence to recognize the mistake being made by them in accusing St Tony and need to apologise. 300,000 people have been killed in the Middle East 3000 by ISIS. Tony Abbott is declaring ISIS is far worse than the Nazi's who killed 6 million but tried to hide it. The numbers speak for themselves to highlight a somewhat retarded comparison that Abbott should have known not to use but to tread lightly. However he doesn't know that and refuses to accept it as an unfortunate remark. However he did give credit to where credit is wanted and did what ISIS crave promotion.
"Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Robert Goot said Mr
Abbott's comparison of the Islamic State and Nazi Germany was
"injudicious and unfortunate".
"The crimes of Islamic State are indeed horrific, but cannot be
compared to the systematic round-up of millions of people and their
despatch to purpose-built death camps for mass murder.
"There is a
fundamental difference between organised acts of terrorism and a
genocide systematically implemented by a state as essential policy.
"Acts
of terrorism are necessarily done in the full glare of publicity for
their propaganda effect. In contrast, those responsible for ordering and
implementing systematic state-sponsored genocide are high government
officials who often operate in secret not out of any sense of shame, but
to avoid being held criminally responsible for their actions."
Bolt expects a Jewish apology showing his true colors
" Liberal MP Josh Frydenberg, who is Jewish, declined to comment about the dispute."
Liberal Money Managers
"
The Government acknowledges that other countries heavily reliant on
their resource sectors, like Canada and Brazil, have fallen into
recession, but Treasurer Joe Hockey said Australia would not be next."Hockey
Yet while the commercial sector is divesting it's risk in coal Abbott is determined to push ahead.
"Mr Hockey blamed one-off factors such as weather-related interruptions to mineral exports for the softer-than-expected figures."
Weather related interruptions or climate change? What is Hockey saying? Are they likely to get more frequent?
"The Australian economy continues to grow, despite the biggest fall in our terms of trade in about 50 years," he said." Matthias Corman
How pray tell is a shrinking economy growing is this Corman wisdom? Particularly when figures haven't been as bad for 50 Years or 1965. Back when the Liberals were such good money managers
"In nominal terms — with the effects of inflation excluded — GDP growth was 1.8 per cent, the weakest figure since 1962."
REMEMBER WAYNE SWAN!!!
Link News Corp Paywall
It's not about Australians losing jobs which is Bolt's distortion. There is no guarantee that Australians will gain any jobs from this agreement.Does the China Free Trade Agreement threaten Australian jobs?
" drop barriers to our farmers and manufacturers and especially to
businesses, which can supply its rising middle class with things such as
healthcare." Bolt
Have you ever seen Bolt specify what these new jobs will be in manufacturing or health? He talks about them. That's easy but the unemployed want more than talk and they want it now. Oh so what's promised is no jobs will be lost not gained. Then what's wrong with this fact check which never gets a rational reply only that it's a leftist lie.
Say something meaningful Mr Bolt
- The claim: Unions say the China-Australia
Free Trade Agreement "allows Chinese companies to bring in their own
workforce for projects over $150 million and removes the requirement
that jobs be offered to local workers first".
- The verdict: The
agreement allows the Immigration Department to decide that jobs should
be offered to local workers before it issues visas to overseas workers,
but it does not require this to happen. The ACTU's claim checks out.
- The Tired 'Reform' Agenda Of Neoliberalism Should Be Traded For Equality, Happiness, And Justice Read on the growth of inequality
Links " Scenes from the invasion of Europe:"Andrew Bolt selection.
Scaremongering is Bolt's tool of trade hides his contradictions.
Facts you don't hear from Bolt
We have a a 1.06% intake policy to help asylum seekers on humanitarian grounds that's approx 25,000. We have an immigrant intake of 220,000 total of 245,000 clubbed or 10% p.a
EU has a population of 500, million 1% which even Australians find a mean barely adequate to be called humanitarian aid would mean the EU if it matched our current program would accommodate 5 million. However in 2014 there were approx 750,000 applications for asylum less than 25% of that possible intake. Yet for Bolt the sky is caving in.
Germany if it took 1%it could accommodate 800,000. It has offered to take all the Syrian refugees 250,000. In 2014 Germany had 25% of it's possible intake.If it takes the Syrians it's expected to grow to 70% still below our offer and nowhere near the 10% immigration figures we show.
Yes there's crowding at the borders and the officials were unprepared. However German rural towns are shrinking and like Sheparton and Bendigo are happy to take these refugees. It's what Bolt doesn't want you to hear. Even Iceland with it's population of only 330,000 found 10,000 of its population volunteering to house refugee families themselves. That's 30,000 people when their government capped it to 50. So now it's all being reviewed since the they came to find the people and government were so philosophically different.
If 2015 sees an arrival of 1million people that's only 20% of it's equivalent to Australia's stated program.
Bolt is blowing out a difficult logistics program and turning it into an "invasion"which it isn't. His language is simply that of the far right. It is here and he supports the same in the EU. He's using photos and videos to make a point when analysed even in comparative terms with Australia isn't happening. How contradictory is Bolt he supports the increased bombing of Syria while ranting about how Syrian refugees need to be stopped and sent home. Boats towed back, Trump like walls erected and more razor wire needed. Soon he'll feel safe to advocate them to be shot. He represents the loud and ugly side of this country and supports it just as strongly elsewhere.
European Attitude
Australian Attitude
Dutton comment "it's sad but we have to do it"!!
Bolt relies on local meteorology to prove Global Science wrong. Confusing the two is all he want's to achieve. He's thrown in the proven lie of a hiatus in warming for 18 years to boot. It's truly throwing mud at an ever growing teflon wall. Bolt's is as frustrated as the tobacco and asbestos execs who also see their tactics losing on a daily basis. Does he really seem genuine to his ever diminishing number of believers? He even throws "trust" in to stem the ever shrinking number of believers still on his side.By
taking action now against climate change the world would save $1.8
trillion by the year 2040, however if no action is taken, it will lose
$44 trillion
Link SMH and a pollster
" I think if the Liberals can limit the swing to below 8%, they can spin that"
Notice it no longer talk of "the electorate" but what the LNP needs to be able to "spin" the result. This argument pays no respect for the electorate it's all about what Tony's political position can bear. That's the essence of Bolt's source " the spin after the result.
" Labor has fuelled speculation it is more concerned with ensuring
Tony Abbott remains Liberal leader than winning the Canning byelection,
mounting what has been reported to federal cabinet as a low profile
campaign in the West Australian seat… It has raised questions on whether
the ALP would rather see Mr Abbott remain leader than win Canning in an
upset."
Logically Federal ALP politicians aren't storming the electorate as are the LNP why would they have to? Bolt seems to think there's something contradictory in having strong activity by locals in a local election. To have a blitzkrieg of ACT LNP pollies is proof of Federal desperation. But then Bolt came from Tarcoola which he thinks some how him a true blue Aussie. More Aussie than the rest of us city folk because we don't know about the heart of Tarcoola. Let's get one thing straight immigration regulations determined were migrant families ended up and not their preference. It shows to Because Bolt says he feels more Dutch than Australian. So much for his Tarcoola.
News Corp Paywall
So Tony Abbott was wrong
" If you've got a free media you've got to allow them to take up a
position. If you want good coverage you've got to perform well and the
reason why this government gets poor coverage at least in areas of media
is because it's been the worst government in history. if you want
better coverage, be a better government" Tony Abbott just 2 years ago." Tony Abbott
Dutton and Bolt are fine to cry victim and or disparage, but all other media should be merely stenographers the Hansards report but not confront. That's not what Tony Abbott believes he supports the fact that the press needs to be there to hold the government to account and put them under the microscope and if they don't they are failing in their duty. If that's the case and they are meant to bring discomfort to the comfortable. Then press failure according to Tony Abbott is Andrew Bolt and News Corp and Peter Dutton's inappropriate whinge. Tracking Abbott’s Record ”August” Update – » The Australian Independent Media Network
Is this what Dutton means by Jihad reporting?
Jews are upset by Tony Abbott...is this Jihad?
Link News Corp Paywall
Bolt generalising about Chafta says
"That access to the world’s biggest market will create Australian jobs for decades."
So Bolt tells us there's to be an explosion of jobs in farming, manufacturing and health. Our labour is free to shift to China as China's is free to shift here. On which planet does that make sense? Our unemployed car workers can go to China can they and transport their skills? Maybe our nurses feel free to go.
In what world does Bolt believe the manufacturing sector will explode with activity here because we have signed the Free Trade Agreement? Will we suddenly be making shoes for China? The Chinese can build a 44 story sky scraper in 3 weeks do they need Australians on site? How many more station hands will be needed in our cattle industry if our herds increase? Dairy and beef are no longer small businesses requiring manual labour.
There is truth in Bolt's lie though. The FTA was a initially a labour project in progress and close finalization with some qualifications needed. Abbott rushed in ditched those just to take the glory of a signature. He did it for the obvious, political reasons far and above fundamental commercial ones like labour controls.
"Labor tried for years for something like this and when the Abbott
Government clinched it last November, Shorten claimed part of the credit
for his party." Bolt
That heated rush has ignored the Australian labour component of the agreement while supporting the one for the Chinese by turning a blind eye to those details. In other words it's totally lopsided agreement. To simply say Australia will profit doesn't specify who in Australia it benefits. The CFMEU didn't shy away from asking that question nor did the ALP. The LNP are kow towing & singing ' from little things big things grow' when logic dictates it's another song "it ain't necessarily so".
Bolt's and the LNP's political distortion and deflection and smokescreen!!
"So why might the CFMEU say that? Well, it must destroy the Abbott
Government, which created a royal commission into union corruption that
has so far recommended charges against some senior CFMEU officials."
"But why might Shorten be repeating those claims?"
What Bolt argues is irrelevant and only draws attention away from the fact the Australian worker has been stitched. Abbott has driven and agreement not for the country but for the minority of wealthy of this country. He's also stoked an age old political argument he believes he can win. He along with News Corp and his $80 mill Royal Commission into union corruption will holler that the unions along with the ALP don't want the whole of Australia to profit. The ALP will argue but it's not for Australia's benefit only the 1%. It's the traditional historic and ideological battle field. What's not being argued is that wealth for the rich is no guarantee of more work. The trickle down effect does not work.
This is an old argument and Abbott wants to run with it because on the surface and agreement with China seems good until you read the fine print. He's been fundamentally fighting workers since he left school and knows the territory well. It's a fight he's used to. The Hawkes, Fergusons, and other labourites that don't want to fight this battle are denying it for what it is seemingly good. So they believe it's best to deal with the aftermath much later.
What's annoying is even staunch Marxists would be happy to see it pass because globalisation of labour is in their interest it will simply accelerate the demise of capitalism in the wealthier sovereign states and as a consequence unify the international labour movement needed to face the now mega transnational corporations running governments like ours.Theirs is wanting to accelerate the bigger picture.
Link News Corp Paywall
Bolt seems to pull his quotes from wherever, whenever and whatever context that suit. Mark Dreyfus QC could run the rings off Andrew Bolt when it comes to the law. So could our current AG George Brandis. The trouble with Brandis it would take a month of Sundays and in a style so cryptic you wouldn't realize it was happening. Bias Heydon's family connections are Liberal through and through. They alone should convince anybody he shouldn't have been selected for the post. Let alone hi incompetence and inability to keep up with the technology in a modern court room. To challenge the comfortable is far from smearing it's duty as is comforting the challenged. Bolt does nothing as far as the Liberals are concern other than pamper their cause.
Link News Corp Paywall
To prove he's an ultra racist that never gives in despite the fact all those around him have moved forward on humanist grounds Andrew Bolt proves hes not Rudyard Kipling's man from the poem "If". He's is a child who refuses to give in. He's not only remains bitter about his earlier put down but is a brat in every sense of the word. A hypocrite of course because back in the day he called a truce on the hounding of Adam Goodes himself.
The social world we live is a social construction of meanings in some cases shared in many not. Dustin Martins gesture was clear and obvious to all those who follow AFL and are not new to Australia. It was hardly a confusing gesture. The rules are quite clear on it's symbolic nature and were applied.
Adam Goodes dance and spearthrowing gesture had obviously less shared meaning even though it was Indigenous Day another forgotten meaning on the day . The whole episode could be likened to a Australian tourist patting a childs'd head in Thailand which is extremely rude and upsetting to some Thais but and affectionate gesture by the tourist. Obviously it's an action not symbolically shared. Bolt's akin to the angry Thai demanding the tourist be thrown in prison in other words making him the bigot over reacting to the situation.
Bolt is a racist who gave no consideration to the meaning of Goodes's gesture other than the one he had decided to put on it. He was left far from the majority of opinion and now remains a drowning man grasping at straws. In this case Leigh Matthews is just another straw. Bolt hasn't gained any advantage by his moronic revival of a matter that's now considered done and dusted. His continuance just substantiates his racism and his immaturity. It once again reminds us that the AFL rules aren't that complicated and are applied with more common sense than what Bolt shows.
Link Simon Beson News Corp Drone
Peter BH aka Bolt's Troll selected a Daily Telegraph drone to do Andrews job for him. Andrew is of course off rehearsing for the spontaneous and relaxed Sunday Bolt aka News Corp Report.
I'm sure serious discussions about bombing Syria did begin months ago about the time Abbott disappeared from the face of media because everything at the time was making him look a fool. Bolt certainly kept him off his radar and turned to Shorten and other side shows to feed his blogs. The fatuous argument that Beson and Bolt have put forward that there was no Canning conspiracy doesn't hide the fact that Abbott uses Defence and National security to bolster his ratings and that Canning will be a Khaki election. Any election Abbott runs will be along with Border Protection. Abbott simply likes standing between uniforms and flags. All this tedious attention to when Randall died and who said what is just a smokescreen to deny this intent.
Whether Abbott's ratings were slipping or not doesn't hide the fact he was after poll improvement politicians always are and the only way he'd managed it in the past was playing the warrior leader. Approaching Obama on Syria was a way forward as Iraq had slipped off the front page and Syria was gaining greater attention as a topic of conversation.
The blog banner tells us the need to revive the fear of ISIS is at hand. They might as well have written that the Left don't take FARC in South America seriously or Al Shabab in Africa or any other revolutionary or terrorist group. Because in fact we don't and nor should we. The ADF is not defending Australia by being in Iraq it's only defending Tony Abbott. The only reason Abbott does this is out of some fantasised need of fear from which to draw political advantage . It will definitely be cranked up for Canning. What we ought to be disgusted about however is Abbott will bomb and kill civilians for his poll ratings grab.Should Australia fight terror in Syria?
Link John Hinderaker of Powerline and Breitbart are the least repected Tea Party digital media in the USA
Bolt turns to the right wing digital gutter press of America to show he's up close and personal with the scum of US media. It goes to show just how close he is not a single Republican candidate referred to it as a act of racial- hatred. So Bolt can declare himself on the eccentric fringe.
Firstly both Powerline and Breitbart are advocates for more guns. They speak for the NRA and the claim if America was more armed these events would not occur. Bolt supports this as he used Hineraker's as his source yesterday. His inspirational head office is after all Fox News.
When all other MSM American media reported that Bryce Williams main problem was the fact that he was two years before sacked from WDBJ the TV station he'd once worked at for anger management issues. Williams had specific issues with the people he worked there with but none with the Charleston shootings by Dylan Roof. Bolt, Breitbart and Powerline attempt to make them seem racially equivalent hate events. Bolt jumps on the right wing band wagon and is happy to see the racial history of America reduced to the reverse racism white victimhood at the hands of groups like Black Lives Matter.
" We won’t have a conversation about whether pushing a perennial
picture of victimhood for blacks and gays in the most black-friendly,
gay-friendly country on the planet could drive supposed victims to
violence."
Why are Republicans so racist because it actually makes no difference to them as black people if they vote are in the main democrats. By portraying these events as reverse racism they just might gain some voters when they see the push back this racist stance creates but simply reinforcing the racist beliefs of their supporters.
Reply to Fox News trying to portray it as a hate crime
"No, Gretchen, it's not," Viollis replied. "This is quintessential
workplace violence from the behavioral profile of the individual to the
actions that he displayed, from the manifesto to the time he was
terminated in 2013."
Link The Age. The Catallaxy Files Right Wing Propaganda
Andrew Bolt does so little work. Here he has the IPA write his opinion for him. News Corp drones do it for him regularly at other times. Then more often than not Peter BH his reliable cut & paste troll.
It's strange how Andrews said to be in cahoots and controlled by the unions is facing so many stoppages. Isn't that what the Liberals complained about that it was the ALP organizing the unions them to hinder them while in power? Politics is all about negotiation and compromise. Something even Bolt can't seem to acknowledge.
Link News Corp Paywall Link News Corp Paywall
As below the one voice of News Corp is a hydra of 3 heads. Bill Shorten has shot Sheriff Dyson Heydon who in fact shot himself in the foot. There's an opportunity for the Liberals to call an early election as they claim Labour is so scarred by this episode. However it doesn't seem to be reflected in the Canning Polls. Does anybody really think Tony Abbott would take advantage of this fantastic opportunity Albrechtsen is talking about and Bolt are alluding to? Not on your sweet Nelly.
Bolt drags another irrelevant sideshow into the mix a court case between the CFMEU and Boral. It in fact has no relevance to Dyson Heydon the Sheriff having shot himself in the foot by his own admissions. Side shows have been Bolt's repetitive nonsense which he's been blogging for the past week. A lot to say about nothing is typical of Bolt. He could be talking about the corruption and skulduggery in the secret society not of the trade union but that of the Liberal Party, Australia's primo money managers. $2mill that they gave to a past known offender why? They did it and never even talked about it amongst themselves it was a secret that Eric Abetz has carried with him for years, why?. Because for no other reason than he was one of their own.
Mudslinging at teflon walls "sliming" is all Bolt has on offer here. It's the only recourse that Bolt has had for weeks. Why is the unbiased Sheriff Heydon taking such a long time to make a decision on such a straight forward matter, waiting for Tony is he? It's hardly the most difficult decision he ever had to make. He made it very quickly when characterizing Gillard and Shorten.
Doing a Bolt how is it Liberal Party "friends" are never really put under the microscope yet they do more harm to the community than unions.'What are you blokes doing?'
Link News Corp Paywall
As I've always said Bolt tries to make single News Corp sound byte look like a hydra and a variety of opinions when in fact it's only one. The longer his blogs are the less he has to say and the larger the smokescreen, misrepresentation deflection and distortion is.
From the 50's through till now we have seen significant changes in laws and attitudes to LGBTs. The concept of bullies of the left is ludicrous given the changes we have seen occur. From draconian bedroom laws to the real and brutal poofter bashings by homophobic heterosexual traditionalists who Bolt now likes to call the new age victims who need to be defended. Victims who aren't set upon who aren't expected to go into hiding other than for the shame of their denied history. Oh dear Bolt now feels set upon by the bullies of the "left" that in fact are of neither political persuasion only a humanist one which Blot's claims to be but isn't. Proof "Dr. George Ian Ogilvie Duncan (20 July 1930 – 10 May 1972) was an Australian law lecturer at the University of Adelaide who drowned on 10 May 1972 after being thrown into the River Torrens
by a group of men believed to be police officers. His murder was
significant because public outrage generated by the murder became the
trigger for homosexual law reform that led to South Australia becoming the first Australian State to decriminalise homosexuality. Sorry your concept of bullying carries no weight Andrew Bolt.
Link News Corp paywall
So typical of Andrew Bolt. When Malcolm Fraser Liberal giant told Howard or Abbott what they should do Bolt vented his spleen on the man and called him everything under the Sun. Now he's trying to turn Bob Hawke into a Liberal Party giant why? The denial that the China FTA allows for the importation of Chinese labor into Australia and is a threat to Australian jobs and wages. What Andrew Bolt Conveniently doesn't say is:
Does the China Free Trade Agreement threaten Australian jobs?
- The claim: Unions say the China-Australia
Free Trade Agreement "allows Chinese companies to bring in their own
workforce for projects over $150 million and removes the requirement
that jobs be offered to local workers first".
- The verdict: The
agreement allows the Immigration Department to decide that jobs should
be offered to local workers before it issues visas to overseas workers,
but it does not require this to happen. The ACTU's claim checks out.
- The Tired 'Reform' Agenda Of Neoliberalism Should Be Traded For Equality, Happiness, And Justice Read on the growth of inequality
Link SMH Link Aljazeera
1 They are not "illegal Immigrants" they are legal asylum seekers.
2 There is no doubt many are dying in desperation to escape where they are coming from. In Syria for instance 250,000 have died in the past 5 years. Bolt finds it strange that people are in fact fleeing death.
Australia is about to start bombing Syria and Bolt needs them to stay there. Yes people are connecting with smugglers along the way and dying as a consequence. Largely because of the efforts to stop them reaching European safe havens. To call them illegals and economic refugees is nothing more than changing the narrative to enable the illegal process of fence building.
3 If asylum seekers were not prevented in their efforts would as many have died, no. Would smugglers be as able to operate so dangerously on a minimum expense for maximum profit business model of course not. Bolt's argument these people must be stopped an towed back is the ludicrous pretext to be saved from dying. If you want to save them from drowning you allow them to come in safe boats. They wouldn't then die because you've destroyed the smugglers business model.
1 million is an exaggerated figure but among but if 20 countries of the EU took them it's 50,000 or twice the humanitarian intake of Australia and we are regarded as mean tight arses given we take 220,000 immigrants each year. We actually advertise for immigrants but won't look among those for whom it means life or death. In fact we want to send 1000 Iranis back to a country we don't trust an would consider bombing. Germany alone is expected to take 170,000 and some towns are welcoming them.
4 We run a 457 visa schemes which is in fact the privatization of immigration on a temporary basis but won't assist asylum seekers if they could fulfill the requirements. We have more illegals enter legally by plane than by boat. It's what makes it a farce and so hypocritical..
Abbott's back so we need a promo. ASIO,AFP, ABF, Customs, State Police, Transport Police how much policing to we need???
It's Spring Time for Hitler. Will the ABF be doing a song and dance routine as well?
To make migrants feel wanted and Reclaim Australia and the Patriots Defence League those with Nazi paraphernalia feel justified.
"
"a responsibility to keep our community safe. In order to do that we need to ensure that people are behaving appropriately." = SURVEILLANCE YOUR BEING WATCHED TO ENSURE YOU VOTE CORRECTLY. WELCOME TO ORWELLS WORLD.
OOPS a DAISY
Link SMH, Link Andrew Bolt 2011, Link Voice of America Link RN ABC
What Bolt overlooks and has never understood was the meaning of scientific method. Scientific method is about collecting as much data about the globe possible and trying to evaluate emergent patterns that are occurring. Long distant futuristic predictions aren't the core of science at all.
However that's where skeptics love to sit on that fringe of uncertainty and faith jousting not with the data and patterns that are emerging and being agreed upon in the real world. But in the realm of imaginary dragons and exaggeration for little more than venal interests and political friends. It's where they feel safe talking bullshit fantasy and uncertainty not in the realm of 97% agreed upon global science. Bolt is comfortable playing in the media sandpit of opinion with the kids but he shuts up when it comes to current and strong emerging evidence. No he even simply denies it.
I do suggest you watch this video
