Showing posts with label Subs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Subs. Show all posts

Wednesday, 22 September 2021

Fighting Fake News with REAL 22/9/21; Riots in Melbourne; "We vs "Me"; Paul Keating; Subs;

 

 

 

History has shown where there are unions there scabs strike busters or even the creators of strikes if needed. Alwaus ready for action as Trump clearly said when telling the Proud Boys et al to stand down but stand by. They are the extreme professional sponsored alt- right wing mercenaries. When Muslims wanted to build a mosque in Bendigo they were there. Or better said when Australian citizens want to build a church hall and their beliefs aren't appreciated they were there. They were back then what Murdoch media dubbed "patriots" "good people". They are organized, sponsored, move fast and do so at any opportunity to tarnish and divide Australia. Today they called "workers" "tradies" by the press but they aren't  they are a minority mob driven by bikers, Qanon, Nazis, PLF, and on any other day Murdoch's "Patriots". They are influncers after the political publicity, right-wing, anti- left, anti- Society and  anti- the ACTU and CFMEU. They are scabs, mercenaries anti- society and masters of chaos who have kidnapped a minority of unionists for their political purpose. Real unionists are family men for vaccinations, anti the spread and willingly and ready to work on mandated work sites as their organization leaders have plainly stated.

Union Claims Protesters Weren’t Real Tradies: “There’s No Way They’d All Turn Up On Time”

 Lets face it if the LNP in government can orchestrate a coup in Chile a street riot in Australia by a minority pretending to represent a whole industry isn't a very difficult task

Newly declassified documents reveal that Australia helped the US overthrow Chile’s democratically elected socialist government and install the brutal Augusto Pinochet regime. Chilean exiles in Australia are demanding an apology.

Australia Played a Key Role in Chile’s 1973 Coup.

 

 When the "we" comes up against the "me" Public Health and Safety is of far greater value. These performance protesters are simply all about "me" just as they were in the USA, and Hitlers Germany very easy to find and set loose.

Premier Daniel Andrews has urged Victorians to stay the course, saying “there is no other way” and vaccinations are “the only ticket out of the pandemic” as Melbourne teeters on the edge.

 ‘There’s no other way’: Daniel Andrews urges Victorians to stay the course

 


 

 The 'Reverse Bank' has to quickly rediscover the gear stick

Opinion
National security

 It takes a monster level of incompetence to forfeit military control of one’s own state, but this is what Scott Morrison and his government have managed to do.

The Liberals, having no faith in the capacity of Australians and all we have created here, could not resist falling back, yet again, to do the bidding of another great power, the United States of America.

Menzies, even after World War II, did Britain’s bidding against the international community in attempting to wrest the Suez Canal from Egypt just as he deceptively committed Australian troops to Vietnam to appease the United States.

Howard, another US appeaser extraordinaire, committed us to an illegal war in Iraq with tragic consequences.

Morrison is making an enemy of China - and Labor is helping him


Monday, 1 October 2018

Andrew Bolt's Blog,1/10/18; Caught and Bowled by the ABC and now dare destroy their Independance; Sub a toy in the hands of the LNP; SCOTUS; Anne Coulter; Turnbull;












1m
 38m
Bolt, says he believes in a free press but only a corporate and privatised one, not a public broadcaster owned by the people themselves. Bolt believes in mistakes, fake news, and privatised hidden persuaders calling themselves informers while selling a false product in order to sway. But he doesn't believe in the goals of investigative reporting based on data and evidence in an attempt to inform a nation. Basically Andrew Bolt doesn't believe in an informed voting public that just might interfere with the interests of a holy few because he simply doesn't believe inequality fairness and prefers to sell us that we have arrived at the best of possible worlds today that simply needs constant and minor adjustments that don't upset the balance of power an privilege that exists today. 
Bias for Bolt is the ABC because it threatens the flow of narrative that justifies the current balance power. If it weren't for the ABC there'd be no Royal Commission into Banking. If it weren't for the ABC there'd have been no revelation of just how trite the Royal Commission into Trade Unions was. Bolt would get away with his silent on banking and not be questioned for it. He wouldn't have been caught out for overreach and bias on the Union inquiry or Abbott's mistakes and Trump-like failures would have been easily ignored and Murdoch's efforts to boost him less obvious. 
Bolt makes little or no effort to show how boosted by News Corp's amplified attacks on the ABC supported by the IPA have boosted the government to cross the Statutory lines that guaranteed the ABC it's independence. The majority of the ABC board weren't chosen on merit but political lines which were in effect over-ridden by Fifield.
There was a concerted assault on the ABC and it blew up in the face of those that tried and now in true form Bolt's deflecting the blame by moving on and trying to deny the new Chairman-elect her credentials largely because she's a woman. All the previous directors many of whom were and still are friends of the LNP have openly declared the Government was in error and had overstepped the lines of appointments, budget and procedures of complaint that have occurred in the past 5 years in the concerted effort to neuter the ABC. They will now be forced to take that to the next election. The bias doesn't "stay" as Bolt says but the assault and Independence of our public broadcaster has been saved along with the values of ethical journalism. Bolt plays whack-a-mole as a distraction to avoid the central issues involved.




38m

Remember the argument on whether building submarines was critical or just political. There was a need far greater than was to improve the relationships with our neighbours. Well, Abbott certainly stopped that and he handed the Pacific on a platter to China. He cut Foreign Aid and the Chinese moved in. He instead went to war in the Middle East and hoped Ukraine where subs were sorely needed.
Abbott's efforts were purely symbolic and so his efforts to be the Pivot of the Pacific were actually put on hold while he was threatening to shirtfront Putin and become an honorary member of NATO. Abbott's approach to subs was more like our Woomera rocket give the plans to the Japanese and let them build one for us. That was his approach to our new symbolic subs too. Meanwhile, China took the diplomatic and commercial approach and have increased their influence over the region.
The Submarines have been used as a political chess piece for the internal politics of the Liberal Party more so than Australia's immediate need.
It seems we sold our Northern Port to the Chinese so strangely enough, there doesn't seem to be the urgency Bolt's talking about. Will the Americans rent the Darwin Port off the Chinese waterlogged is the very idea of the necessity of Subs which was adopted by Abbott but the cheapest ones possible which after delivery will turn out like his NBN the cheapest possible and one that's been going in reverse ever since.


Damon joins witch hunt

HOW SMEARING KAVANOUGH SAVED SICK DAMON

How Matt Damon got the Left to forgive him for saving a sleaze: by smearing a conservative: "Damon [was] accused of helping to pressure the New York Times to kill an investigative story in 2004 into movie mogul Harvey Weinstein’s sexual misconduct.Now, he seems to have found redemption after mocking Judge Brett Kavanaugh... on Saturday Night Live."
25m


Bolt's "almost certainly innocent conservative" ignores that even Brett Kavanaugh's male best friends have coming out saying Trump's SCOTUS nominee is "certainly not as innocent as he makes out" As can be expected Andrew Bolt leaves that out of his post. So much so even Trump has shut up defending him and has deferred Kavanaugh to the FBI investigation. The only thing "almost certain is" no matter the FBI result the Republicans will still vote for him.
 Bolt's outrage is News Corp's posturing Downunder for Bolt to get some recognition for himself in the eyes of head office and his boss the organ grinder Rupert.
Matt Damon's silence on Weinstein is in no way equivocal to his skit on Kavanaugh. Weinstein wasn't running for SCOTUS the highest court in the country. But then Bolt does believe in Corporate Government in a Corporate run Nation, doesn't he?

 


1h

 What's funny is how shyly Bolt directs his readers to Coulter without any real comment.
Coulter tries to fend a cohort, a group. of statistically recognizable White Republicans how by running through and collecting a very singular group of unrelated individuals and suggesting them to be a group of like-minded thinkers to form her committee of better approved "optics" than the GOP committee in question too scared to question Ford for the sole purpose of claiming a case for reverse Sexism, genderism and racism existed against the Republicans. However whenever Coulter says anything publicly she sounds as believable as Trump which hardly helps those she's defending but then a committee of White male Republicans is hardly a defendable group. Any wonder Bolt doesn't bother to even try he just points.

Coulter also said she was raped too and she's got over it while defending both white men and women who sympathize GOP heroes. But then Coulter has so often made an idiot of herself simply by saying things that were patently false in the media. She is Donald Trump in a skirt after all. "In the history of the world, there has never been a more pacific, less rapey creature than the white male of Western European descent. " Unless necrophiliacs whites have since WW2 utilised mass killing via superior technology to do their killing for them. Bombing, Agent Orange etc come to mind which disposed of millions more efficiently which left humans totally fucked wouldn't you say, Anne Coulter? 55% of GOP say Sexual Assault not Disqualifying for SCOTUS; What is *Wrong* with Them?

Reversing everything is the logic of the Bully and it's clear patently obvious when Bolt does it as his role models are Fox News celebs. Reverse Racism, Sexism, Genderism and bullying is a policy that has no basis or logic in reality. It's devoid of social and historical context and is simply another form of harassment from the top down why? Because they can and have the resources and any form of protest is then called bullying again. However, in Truth, the reverse doesn't exist all of the above is a one-way street. The very fact Bolt wears a suit and calls out for manners exposes him for what he is a person who plays at being believed only he doesn't believe himself.

'Reverse Racism' Is A Giant Lie – Here's Why - YouTube


1h

AbbottAbbottAbbott The bottom line his Party threw him out Malcolm Turnbull Resigned and Bolt keeps on about TurnbullTurnbullTurnbull. We can guess in the popularity count in the polls Bolt was on the losing side on every poll in the last 5 years. In fact was Abbott ever really ever liked by anyone other than Murdoch and the IPA and is "like" even an appropriate word when uttered in the same sentence as Abbott?


Sheik Hilali

HILALI IS A LEADER TO MAKE US FEAR ISLAM

Column Muslims may complain about “Islamophobia”, but why wouldn’t Australians fear Islam when they see what leaders Muslims keep choosing? Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali was last week anointed Grand Mufti again. He once called the September 11 terrorist attacks “God’s work against oppressors” and praised suicide bombers as “heroes”. Then there's his rivals...
4h

Hilali may be hailed as a “moderate”, but he called the September 11 terrorist attacks “God’s work against oppressors” and praised suicide bombers as “heroes”. A decade ago, he called the Holocaust — the Nazi murder of six million Jews — “a ploy made by Zionists”, after accusing Jews of using “sex and abominable acts of buggery, espionage, treason and economic hoarding to control the world”. Bolt



Remember when the Imam said women shouldn't dress provocatively and display themselves as meat in public. Bolt said the same thing recently that he wouldn't let his daughter wear clothing he didn't approve of. He mocked Islam and the Imam back then for advising others on what Bolt has said and he's publicly slut-shamed women in his rants for being "irresponsible" and blaming men for their bad behaviour. Bolt mocked the Imam but was really mocking himself back then.
 Let's not forget Australia invaded Iraq and killed a million Iraqis over a lie and has continued to bomb the crap out of and boycott the Middle East and in that context, the Imam was simply providing a historical explanation for September 11. Suicide bombers are simply a reflection of the lack of access to technology there are far fewer events in Syria given Israel has been a defacto airforce for rebels some of whom we call terrorists.
Remember after the Barcelona bombing Bolt called for Christians to be as determined and heroic in their beliefs as the suicide bombers were in theirs that day. In fact, he called them brave and he even called for war, a jihad for Christianity and called Christian youth today as gutless.

Bolt calls himself a moderate do you hear moderate Muslims acting and calling out demands as he does? Well, Bolt sounds very much more than a moderate Christian Imam. He's advocated increased bombing in the Middle East. He supports the brutality of the Israeli's in the Middle East today, in fact, lies on their behalf in Australia and hides the fact that they aid and arm those we call terrorists in Syria.
One thing is certain Bolt has been appointed to his position and not elected it's why he's not a politician he doesn't have the respect of the majority of Australians. He's doing a propagandists job only extremists would line up for and doing it for political strategy alone. Why has Bolt raised this issue today when Muslims aren't even in our 24/7 news cycle today? Nothing better to do but raise a divisive matter that only his "indigenous mob" will read?

 I wonder what his daughter thinks of him?

Tuesday, 25 October 2016

Andrew Bolt's Blog,25/10/16; Bolt is such a Golum in News; Bolt the bludger stealing other peoples work; No subs are safer; Bolt has no appreciation for anything wild; 3 lot's of slackers to blame; Poll dancing; Hypothetical dream world of Bolt

 


Who let them in?

 Image result for Images of a media cover up of a crime

 

 Andrew Bolt simply applies News Corp political distortion the facts of life in Australia. He just proves  he's an ultra racist with his Hansonite intent to a crime in Toorak today.

One has to ask why it's only News Corp and Andrew Bolt who claim these "kids" were of African appearance? CCTV doesn't suggest anything of the kind. Denis Callaway said "these were out of control kids" and Tony Fialides believed "they knew exactly what they were doing". These are the two owners of Imp Jewellery.   According to Fialides the robbers knew the shop  and must have cased it before hand given their security.  Imp is no ordinary Jewellery shop. So if they were of obviously "African in appearance" did they know which counters to attack. The owners would have remembered them.  After all the shop isn't a walk through like Myers.  Bolt has taken the opportunity to simply take a few facts  and cobble them together for his racist narrative conveniently allowing him to say "who let them in". News Corp is the only organization to suggested  they were  African and the reason for the crime.
 Jewellers have a history of this kind  of violent robberies and  often it's been by people within the industry itself that have been the perpetrators. I could list countless violent robberies over the past 30 years and non violent ones that have taken place.   Robberies where people have  been killed, shot and beaten and not by Africans, Muslims or refugees but Australians and in the main part of the jewellery industry itself.
Callahan and Fialides would attest to that if Andrew Bolt took the time to ask but that's not Bolt's purpose. The Jewellery industry would attest to it and they would all point their fingers to the buyers of the stolen goods who  tend to be known as the ones  that set them up and they aren't African or refugees.
As for Andrew Bolt he wants to suggest it's the newly arrived immigrants refugees blacks Muslims etc etc that are running riot in Melbourne and the country . That it's some new experience and we have never seen anything like this before. History, statistics and even the police records tell us otherwise.  More often than not it's a crime organized from within the industry because it requires prior knowledge  without it amateurs would have insufficient skills to commit it. Andrew Bolt saying it's African is encouraging this group to continue simply because he's putting up a smoke screen for those true criminals involved and not all those from a racial, ethnic or religious caste newly arrived in the country.
Simply these crimes will continue immigrants or not unless something is done about the second hand dealer laws that have been in existense  and people in the industry ready to buy stolen goods.





 

Q&A hijacked: why is the media not investigat...

 Tin eared Bolt seemed to have missed Chris Mitchell's comment on how he failed to see how Abbott didn't know about the email and wasn't involved in the Leyonhjelm and Adler shot gun issue. Will we go back to Abbott?  Mitchell says no and Sinadinos even says it's a long shot a very long shot since the Party has moved on.
 
Image result for Images of an embarassed sexist
 
 Bolt is not only  shy about about Chritine Dolan's  comment and the context it was in he didn't repeat it because it would hav shown how it was he twisted what she had to say. The media in America is just after the dollar and morality and ethics have been laid aside to get it.  Hilary the  a sexual enabler was forgone and never investigated by the media properly! Her point Trump was the cash cow. Bolt twisted that to say not only was the media biased against Trump but Clinton was guilty of anything and everything that didn't grab the attention of the press and TV. 
Why has Fox and others simply allowed Clinton bashing to go on. I believe Dolan really didn't answer that question The answer is clear and simple Trump did fit the commercial role necessary for these media organizations to survive between elections. Print media around the world has been losing money and Bolt was a pot of gold. Fact checks were  simply ignored by all American print and TV. Media Matters was the only organization that actually showed what was going on. Benghazi, the Clinton emails, and the Foundation were shown among other things as  GOP beat ups and lies which the American Constitution allows and Bolt wants that luxury released here. He simply wants to be able to race to the bottom when it comes to the news American style something Christine Dolan was criticizing. 
While Trump and his campaign had one approach which magnify the suspicions about Clinton corruption health and dishonesty they knew only too well nobody would take the time to investigate them in the 24/7 news cycle. Trump simply denied everything and his approach was to lie and threaten to sue all  along the way. It was the history of his career. Even he knew he'd be broke if he really did sue everyone. Clinton having lived the American press experience before just rode with the punches but they weren't ever as juicy as Trump's guilty or not and in all probability more believable. The Democrats used the media to the best advantage but then they had an easy target
One may well ask if Clinton was so corrupt over the 35 years in public view and was  a sexual assistant to Bill American women approved of her anyway and why was it the right wing media who have only just now raised the question a stupid question that in fact makes Trump look even more a misogynist. Trump has always been seen as a whore dog and Bolt has simply been seen as a bullshitter of no principle just a side.Hannity Is Convinced Former Editor For Defunct Tabloid Weekly World News Worked As "Fixer" For Clinton
" Trump sycophant Sean Hannity has continued to sink  lower and lower in order to help boost Trump’s candidacy, this time allowing himself to become the  victim of a tabloid story which was neither verified by Fox News nor any other independent analysis."
 
 Trump Campaign Created Its Own News Show "To Circumvent Mainstream Media"

"After Retreating To Fox News, Trump Campaign Finds A Way To Get Favorable Media Coverage By Just Doing It Themselves"

"Recently, Trump has steered from more mainstream news outlets, retreating to Fox News to help him push his campaign message." $$$$ for Fox


Sean Hannity Brings Supermarket Tabloid To Life By Inviting Clinton “Fixer” To Fox News Prime Time

"Hannity Hypes National Enquirer Story That “Fixer” Helped "Secret Sex Freak" Hillary Clinton Set Up "Illicit Romps With Both Men And Women""


CNN And Fox Push Trump’s Baseless “Pay To Play” Accusation Against Clinton For Morocco Speech She Didn’t Give

 

 

The success of The Australian explained

 https://thumb1.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/996356/242671303/stock-vector-a-word-cloud-of-business-model-related-items-242671303.jpg

Murdoch's philosophy wasn't a move just to the center right had it been that Bolt wouldn't have a leg to stand on today. Neverthe less this blog is not a shred of his work just a cut and paste of someone else's work. It's nice to see however that Bolt now admits that The Age, SMH, and even the ABC were soft and pluralist in their politics giving oxygen and air to a number of opinions. Further that the move by the Australian was in line with the move of News Corp world wide to become a partisan crier for the right not because it was where the readership was but where the money was. That changed the nature of news in this country. Economically it failed however as a political tool it became indispensible to Conservative politics. 

"Witness the Left's distress that there should be a media outlet allowing the debate you will not find on the ABC or in The Age. Note the total lack of self-awareness - a recognition that there is more diversity of views in The Australian than there is in The Age, Guardian or in many parts of the ABC. Or, indeed, in Crikey itself."


How safe are Turnbull's subs?

 Image result for Images of unused weapons

The subs safety hasn't anything to do with the technology whatsoever. How can you politically argue fear and not show your doing something about it. The last lot of subs and planes we had all had faults and one can say we never used them for anything other than practice. The assumption that we need equipment that as we speak is fast becoming obsolete has nothing to do with manufacturers secrets or costs. The fact is our economy wouldn't be as bruised as it is now. Just look at NZ. If we spent more on regional cooperation than policing Bolt seems to believe we won't have the capacity to shirtfront anybody and that's the crux of it The subs aren't safe and they won't be needed in a world where drones will dominate both the skies and oceans and robots will replace ground troops with no increased level of safety over the ignorance of the question.

 

Barracking for the sharks

 Image result for Images of wildlife conservation of sharks

Bolt has no problem treating humans like animals. His problem is a commercial one if it's commercially sound to kill animals or humans go for it. Conservationists are little more than activists. The only reason Bolt is conflicted is not because in the past 100 years 50 % of the planets wild life has been made extinct but if his Dutch dog bit anybody there might be a call for the destruction of domestic pets and his resistance could make him seem an activist. The man is truly feral. A suit and a pretense of style doesn't hide the fact.


Two bunches of slackers

Image result for Images of bludgers 

Bolt eye view

  It won't be long before we see Bolt blaming 3 bunches of slackers the unemployed, the CenterLink staff and the Underemployed those slackers who don't put in the 70 hours a week Bolt he claims to put in. Bolt's definition of work is post a blog and write a column on it then talk about it on Radio and TV spend the week repeating this single idea until it's stretched out to be a golden mile and call it work. That is the true definition of slacking and ripping off the boss. 800k unemployed and 150k jobs less than 3% on CenterLink break the rules and Andrew Bolt call the Unemployed bludgers who need to be policed and punished. He insinuates that the Underemployed 3 jobs and waiting for the phone to ring aren't the the model worker he is. They need to be taught to work harder. What jobs does Bolt suggest? I know someone employed as a casual  worker helping the severely handicapped. She paid under the award. She is directed to work on any day from  Coburg to Frankston is not told the hours she's needed  but averages 30 and has to pay for her transport to work and home often covering 100kms. No holiday pay, no sick leave, no benefits and no guarantee of the job being available to her in 2017 she needs to reapply. There's nothing wrong with the system says Bolt she just has to suck it up. Oh she has a degree and a $50,000 Hex debt 27 and has to live at home. Her parents pay her Social Welfare by subsidizing her employment. God what a bunch of slackers.



Newspoll: the incredible sinking Turnbull

  Image result for Images of poll lying

" The latest Newspoll, taken ­exclusively for The Australian, ­" Bolt Lest we forget taken exclusively for Bolt as well. What Bolt fails to mention was that Bill Shorten was way ahead of Tony Abbott as preferred PM. Malcolm Turnbull remains well ahead of Shorten now. Andrew Bolt ignores this this statistic so as to not reveal the the true story.


 

Why is the Governor still there?

 Image result for Images of cloud cuckoo land

Let's begin with Bolt's conclusion and self admission of ignorance " I don't know which of these "experts" actually defended Warner. I'd suggest they are of the activist Left which tends to believe the means justifies the ends." Bolt Isn't this just a clear example of what Bolt is trying to say. "the means justifies the end" I have the power of amplification says Bolt News Corp's behind me no matter just look at the bank of lawyers. The proof that truth never gets in the way of a bullshitter nor do lies it's the narrative that counts.

Hanson and Bolt seem to be legal experts but in reality we saw Bolt driven to silence and make himself a laughing stock when he came up against the Fijian, Indian Australian woman and Constitutional lawyer in the ABC program Recognition yes or no and here he is again along with Hanson advising us on law again how? By avoiding reality and suggesting what might have happened if an when in his imaginary world.Bolt is such a Walter Mitty

"Tasmanian Premier Will Hodgman said he had discussed the issue with Professor Warner, a prominent legal expert before taking up her role in December 2014, but retained confidence in her."


Monday, 24 October 2016

Andrew Bolt's Blog,24/10/16; Bill Leak is not the publisher of the offensive material; Bolt blaming others for Abbott's trouble; Is this two faced journalism Bolt would teach? Bolt has Alzhiemers he posted this 2-3 days back; Bolt thinks Trump is funny but doesn't know why; Abbott's a winner; Bolt trie his hand at humour;

"Sorry, we can’t display a preview for this IMAGE. Please use Kurator preview button to display the IMAGE in the story.

Bill Leak's offending cartoon 29 / 350" Bolt's blog

This note in Bolt's blog made me realize how Bill leak was free to draw his cartoon. The fact is the cartoon was no longer his it was and is the property of News Corp. It seems to me Bill Leak is a distraction in all of this and it's News Corp the seller of a vilifying product is who ought to be facing the inquiry under Section 18C. Cartoonists have no need to defend Leak but should be up in arms over the fact that News Corp has thrown Leak overboard.

 

 

How Insiders stitched up Abbott

 Image result for Images of blaming others










 Yes it's Bolt trying desperately to make up for the fact that he was the insider  who dobbed Tony in over lying to parliament by pointing to the paper trail indicating that he was actually negotiating with Leyonhjelm himself with regards the Adler shotgun. Bolt showed Abbott's gaffe suggesting he should have shut up  when he posted that email on his blog last week.

 Having dobbed his mate in Bolt went into ostrich mode and stuck his head in the sand. He went into hiding and silence on the subject. He sent his troll Peter BH out to deflect and distract and that email was never mentioned again until Peter Credlin tried to explain it away. Since Bolt laid Abbott bare Bolt's been trying to reverse the issue but by overplaying it and blaming the ABC  he's just really screwing things up even more by bringing attention to it. It wasn't my fault he's saying while trying to blame everyone else now the Insiders who where only on yesterday "This alone gave viewers the impression that Abbott was indefensible and "everyone" would agree." Bolt " Bolt I'm afraid let the cat out of the bag after Abbott stuck his foot in his mouth.

 Bolt's lie; Turnbull was accused simply because he denied an accusation which unlike Abbott's email still remains an  unproven fact put out by Leyonhjelm. It reminds me of when Bolt uses ISIS as proof  for his arguments.  Bolt attested to Abbott's mistake  last week and has now done a 180degree turnaround
"by having host Barrie Cassidy falsely claim that Malcolm Turnbull's guns-for-votes disaster "all started" when Abbott criticised it. False: it all started when Turnbull and his ministers discussed exactly that deal with Senator David Leyonhjelm, " Bolt

Nobody agrees with you Andrew Bolt  but you won't even declare you were the one to cast the shadow over your mate and now your trying to save yourself by blaming others. 

UPDATE

 

 Image result for images of extreme dour faces

Desperation he part of the Abbott insiders Bolt and his Trolls. While everybody stopped to wish the PM a HAPPY BIRTHDAY they couldn't crack a smile in case the faces shattered. Just how dour are these depressives and drivers of fear?

Happy Bday MT   Scott Morrison criticises Tony Abbott's guns for votes denial | afr.com


Image result for images of extreme sour faces

 

Stop these anti-coal fanatics now

Image result for Images of false journalism

What is Andrew Bolt's verifiable proof that a government minister of India has involved himself with an other wise private commercial matter? It seems none. Bolt's source link is himself and his blog of yesterday. The link was to R Puddy who makes no mention of India at all. So it seems Bolt offers no proof whatsoever of what Mr Goyal did or did not say. However given that the GDP of India and the world has increased over the past decade Bolt hasn't any evidence to prove it was due to coal. India is in fact booming so that further suggests what Bolt is saying is total bullshit. In fact India is putting solar powered energy into all Indian villages as fast as possible and is one of the biggest manufacturers of photovoltic cells in the world. Any notion that India is suffering is  bullshit. Those 200 mill people Bolt is alluding to all have mobile phones.

"Incredible, to have green groups campaign so keep the poorest people poor. And to cost Australians money and jobs while doing so. But name a single thing the Turnbull Government is doing to stop them."Bolt

What Bolt doesn't tell us  India is turning to a cheaper and cleaner option


"Bloomberg New Energy Finance reckons that by as early as 2020 large photovoltaic ground-mounted systems will be more economical in India than plants powered by imported coal."

" Uncertainty over the pace at which new large dams or nuclear plants can be built means there is a strong reliance on solar and wind power. The IEA says India has high potential and equally high ambition in these areas to deliver on the pledge to build up a 40% share of non-fossil-fuel capacity in the power sector by 2030.

It believes that 340GW of new wind and solar projects, as well as manufacturing and installation capabilities, can be created by 2040 with strong policy support and declining costs.

According to this scenario, the IEA says, the share of coal in the power generation mix falls from 75% to less than 60%, but coal-fired power still meets half of the increase in power generation."

 India’s Solar Power Is Set to Outshine Coal

 

Coal's claim on India's energy future weakens further : Renew Economy

 "In the end it will likely be prices that dictate how much Australian coal goes to India, rather than India’s energy policies." That doesn't look well for coal with prices of wind and solar falling so rapidly.

 

 

Column

 Image result for Image of sgt schultz

 Bolt's Colum is  a repeat of his post of 2 days ago as usual his "work" is just repetition.  The Column repetition of a blog post which is repetition of the Column which goes into a book which is just a lazy Susan of ideas repeated on radio and an editorial on the Bolt Report. Bolt calls the unemployed bludgers and this professional of 40 years standing claims he works 70 hours a week. He's little more than the Peter Foster of media a bullshitter selling a can of stale air. He does less work than he ever did as a cadet and the little he does it is like  watching for something new on a carousel to come around and around and around. You only see the same horses.

“The new submarines are said to be more advanced, longer and equipped with better accessories,” the report said.

What report is Bolt referring to? Oh  an Israeli report talking about it's fleet and what they had before. There is not in the slightest any comparison to be made with Australia. Yes Bolt's right Australia is trying to save jobs which Bolt doesn't give a rats about. However Israel is not. It already has an unemployment rate of over 30% In Israel unlike Australia you have a right if a religious Jew to be unemployed. Israel  receives Foreign Aid from the US of 5 Billion a year which would equate to $150 billion by 2050. So basically Bolt should have said Israel's subs are free a donation.
 Bolt speaks as if he has the wisdom of Job inside knowledge but in fact he hasn't a clue what is going on . "The completion of a US weapons deal with Israel worth $38 billion clears the way for two of Israel's Arab neighbors to buy US fighter jets." Israel is basically a nett profit seller of weapons the middle man seeming to buy, finance and secretly sell arms to other countries and groups the US doesn't want us to know they are selling to. Israel are the usurers of old leavink us not to ask why do all those terrorists have made in the USA weapons and brand new Toyotas? So Bolt's information for what it's worth is a fart in a wind storm. He is a bullsitter not interested in truth just a narrative.  He hasn't a clue what Israel's deal with Germany is, how it's being paid  for or even if it's a subsidized reparation or  compensation for  WW2. He is a real Sargent Schultz of information and knows nothing
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

ABC hates Trump so much they can't even laugh...

 Image result for Image of a trump joke

It seems to have taken 3 days for Bolt to figure out there was a joke. The ABC simply let it pass through to the wicket keeper. Now Bolt has turned himself into the joke. Trump is the joke Andrew not a single thing he says is greater. It seems that's over Bolt's head. The bigger joke is he intends to go head to head with Fox News post election.

Abbott haters forget Turnbull is 0/3 in this ...

Image result for Image when a loser thinks he's won
"In the three battles between Turnbull and Abbott in the past week, Turnbull has been on the wrong side. Wrong on guns. Wrong on free speech. Wrong on the crooked way Liberal candidates in NSW are chosen." Bolt
1) On the guns it was Bolt who said Abbott was in a pickle caught out lying about negotiations with Leyonhjelm. Bolt even posted the email that he said proved it.
2) Sorry Bill Leak and hate speech is hardly free. It's the sort of speech Hitler entertained us with it's speech that divides a nation and doesn't unite it. It's the speech that will cost Trump the presidency and it cost Abbott the leadership. How on earth can Bolt say Abbott won.
3) Abbott lost the vote at the Liberal conference to Turnbull and Baird. However he thinks he won as does Bolt. Should anyone tell them. Trump thinks he the winner too should anyone tell him? 
Bolt's right Abbott lovers will continue to keep Tony in the dark. Remember the joke about god showing the Jew and Muslim around heaven. When he said be quiet as they approached a hedge and peaked over. "Shhhh on the other side are the Catholics, they think their the only ones here." Yes Tony thinks he's 0/3 up.

Turnbull blasts politician for "waffling" abo...

 Image result for Image joke that failed 


  Was I relly playing the man?
Waffling means talking about nothing Bolt is handing us a post that's the perfect example of nothing. So this post is exactly the definition of waffling. The shortest waffle but nevertheless waffle. Turnbull is the target of airhead Andrew Bolt.


Wednesday, 24 August 2016

Andrew Bolt's Blog, 24/8/16; Reverse racism Reverse sexism, reverse agism don't exist. Just do a body count; Bolt is determined to sink Australia; Bolt want's Brits Brits don't want us;

 

 

 

Claim: alleged killer in Townsville attack cried “Allah”

 

Who made the allegation that Bolt believes in so strongly? Maybe it's Bolt himself who makes them because they always remain anonymous which might make for a good story but has no relevance to truth. If he can't take things further he never reports that those  allegations were incorrect. That leaves a slew of allegations made by Bolt about all sorts of incidents which when proven false are just not spoken of again. Such as the German woman who claimed to have been raped and later admitted she had lied. Not a peep from Bolt who simply left us with the tale of rape

Bolt simply wants to paint a picture he wants his audience to receive. It's not a good tactic then to reject what he's already convinced us might be true.  If that started to happen to often he'd be the boy who cried wolf and that would ruin his image. Bolt tends for this  reason to prefer rumors and the claims of terrorists like ISIS over and above any authorities or experts who tend to try and distinguish if  trends emerge form a number of incidents.  Bolt on the other hand simply assumes all incidents point to  his invented pattern.  He's not in the business of  assuring  we are safe but rather that we are not. Crime is Australia wide but Andrew Bolt will spin a story that is meant to make us think otherwise. If we simply rid ourselves of particular ethnic and religious minority groups in  the country crime will just evaporate and we will all live happily ever after. His logic is perfectly correct but it holds no truth about the world in which we live. If there are no Muslims in Australia we can't expect Muslim crime but then if there weren't any NZers, Brits or Australians in the country the same would apply. The fact that News Corp is entitled to print his garbage as their opinion and  declare it  news is an affront and akin to Peter Foster  selling Baylin Tea as a guaranteed  weight loss product. Rupert Murdoch took the news out of news print and Sky TV and is simply selling lies as product in itself. Somehow he's ripping buyers off.

The Police Commissioners statement is left out of Bolt's report of the incident

 "There is no known ongoing threat to the community arising from this incident," he said. 

"This is not about race or religion.        "It is individual criminal behaviour."

 

 

 

Who let them in?

Mo Farrar a Somali and a suspicious person to Andrew Bolt from a suspicious clan. Why did the UK let him in?

Image result for Images of Mo Farah

" Yet another armed robbery by youths of African appearance"

Africa is a multiracial continent reduced by Andrew Bolt to only blacks it seems. However blacks come from a variety of nations not exclusively AfricaSome Melanesian are black for example. Bolt makes every effort to let us know he's not racist and everyone needs to be treated  individually and equally but spends an enormous amount of energy to prove otherwise and stereotype a race. Our police actually do what  Bolt demands tongue in cheek it seems. Where does Bolt collect his information? Macquarie radio which follows similar political policies to News Corp and encouraged the riots in 2005 on 2GB. It seems News Corp 2GB and SKY are closely related and report allegations rather than facts report what seems rather than what is and ignore the evidence brought to the table by wiser minds. Yes they all collect selective incidents so they can then promote their line of bigoted political opinion.

If only we had the laws of Canada Bolt radio would be shut down  and Bolt thinks he's too restricted

Image result for Images of lies as news

They'd hate the thought of a Mo Farrar or a Sadiq Khan proving them wrong because should that occur their promotion of a racist Australia  under attack just might be wrong. Teenagers do commit crimes and they come in multiracial form. They also attend the best private schools in this country but Bolt fails to focus on that cohort.

Accused  and encouraged to be accused by the likes of Andrew Bolt 

 

Image result for Images African Australians

 

 

 

  We love our gritty city laneways … until they’re a bit too gritty

 

This isn't indigenous but the Culture of Poverty which Indigenous Australians know only too well and yes it's a survival mechanism against idiots like Andrew Bolt stereotyping. He need to be put on a diversionary program and experience the life without Cultural Capital. While money booze art and opera dull Bolt's pain in Malvern. Drugs do the same in Hosier Lane. Does Bolt know Ketamine cures Depression it's legal in the US and with increasing poverty apparently necessary.

 

 

 Aussie artist faced ‘Kafkaesque’ deportation from the UK

Andrew Bolt wants more British immigrants. Britain doesn't want more Australians 

 

 

The price of a wicked law - and the Turnbull Government’s cowardice

 Image result

Hey Andrew Bolt this is the law that Tony Abbott promised to change but lied to you about when he didn't. This is the law that judged you.  Abbott  towed the line of a democratic consensus upheld and deemed necessary by this multicultural settler nation of ours.  This is the law every nation on the planet has accepted to some degree. So what is it do you mean  Andrew Bolt when you say no government should interfere in  the freedom of speech. You have never actually defined it or defended it in all circumstances. In other words free speech is next to meaningless in your hands,

 The government currently has harsher laws about free speech on any number of issues that divide us  which in your ideal world you say they shouldn't but you certainly don't advocate against or defend those rights.  So it isn't a matter of speech at all but specifically the topic you are referring which is to be racist because racism doesn't exist and is just a delusion? Racial, ethnic and religious intolerance don't exist?  Well they clearly do simply because you demand the indigenous to be white and the Fatimas and Abduls of this country to be John and Mary for no reason other than because you demand it to be and anything less offends you.

Pulling out a violin and playing a poor me dirge does nothing to explain why our laws exists and why positive discrimination exists and is necessary the very fact that your parents were allowed to come here as migrants had some element of positive discrimination attached to it. Not all applicants were selected. It becomes hypocritical to think otherwise unless of course you accept elitism and inequality as a natural state of a just and fair society

"The case has restarted public debate about how 18C ­restricts free speech and is misused for financial shakedowns when people complain their feelings have been hurt." Bolt

All that's being argued specifically here is the rapists defense I only put it in a little  bit when she said it hurt I took it out I don't deserve to be judged by the the letter of this unfair law. After all I wasn't wearing my white hood was I. How little bit racist are you Andrew Bolt and if you kill a black person should the law take into account what a nice guy you really are? Mordecai Bromberg really disadvantaged you when he found you guilty.

There is no good or bad law Andrew Bolt there are good or bad people fair or unfair people. The NRA says guns don't kill people people kill people and everyone should be able to bear arms. Same argument you run same logic words don't kill. John Howard is regarded a hero for legislating against everyone bearing arms  and we don't hear you arguing against that. The fact is in the USA  if your between 18-34 and black your 5 times more likely to be killed by police while being less likely to be armed than a white man because your less likely to be able to afford a gun. That trend that statistical probability  or differential is what shows racism to be real. It's those rates of difference that reflect the the biased division between white anglo Australians and indigenous Australians that gives rise to rules of positive discrimination not just for the Aborigines but for the handicapped, women, the aged, the indigenous, ethnic and religious minorities where it's obvious they have been  discriminated against. The law is there to protect and judge them as equal as are any other laws. 

Mistakes are made and some women have spent 15 years in jail for murder only to be exonerated. This Bolt argument that a mistake is being made here or might be made here has no relevance  because all judgements are based on some levels of subjectivity in the process of law. It's  trends the rates of difference that expose the bias that need attending to as was revealed in Don Dale

 


 

 

 

Subs leak

It's Wednesday this is not a Bolt Blog 

Image result for Images of a sinking Australia 

Is this what we really really want and need?

What seems more important to the extreme right is whether or not  secrets can be kept.  When experience tells us they can't.They can't because the extreme right is  the first to release them for their own political advantage to undermine their own team. It's hardly a secret that we are building subs at an exorbitant cost to protect the largest continent with the fewest people on the planet. The subs are going to cost us each  $2000  over some 30 years or some $70 per head. That seems a trifle in the larger scheme of things. However the Dutchman Andrew Bolt doesn't want to pay just use them as a sounding board.  The premise for their existence  is based  on the fact we are surrounded by our enemies unnamed by most politicians so as not to cause offense. But loudly called out loudly by Bolt and the Hansonites as China and Russia. These two haven't traveled politically much further than the Domino Theories of the 50s and 60s that took us to losing wars with our neighbors for short term political gain.

 Currently China could sink this country simply by withholding trade. What use are subs the subs then? They will be valued at little more than bathtub toys. Andrew Bolt is a sponsor an advocate if you like of the sinking of Australia by shirt front. He clearly and loudly lets it be known the Chinese are a blight on the world scene and that Tony Abbott the once  pivot of the Pacific would stand up to them even though he was firmly faced West so much so that's the direction he sent  us to fight. Abbott wanted us to be a part of NATO that's how ludicrous he got. There has  never for a moment been any real consideration of a regional common good by Conservatives. The subs in 2035 will have proven to be as futile an exercise in bluffing as shirt fronting Putin was. But it could  go down in history as yet another but very expensive comic opera performed under the leadership of an incompetent government with the Clive Palmer voice of diplomacy delivered by Andrew Bolt. Palmer and Bolt  seem to have the same  attitudes where China is concerned attitudes that simply ensure a dark long term future. Economics can change at the drop of a hat but friendships are a long time in the making short in the breaking.

Thursday, 14 July 2016

Andrew Bolt's Blog, 14/7/16; Bolt is a Conservative Mad Man and here is the proof;



Column - China grabs, Australia dithers

 Image result for Pics China Fear

 

As if the  once called Pivot (pillock) of the Pacific Tony Abbott didn't know what China was doing in the Pacific all the time  he was  facing West sending troops to Iraq and wanting to send 1000 Australians to the Ukraine to shirtfront Putin. A $200 mill cut to the ABC insured the death of Radio Australia the daily cultural heartbeat of the Pacific islands providing Islanders with news and a cultural connection to us for over 75 years. They spoke English. Did Abbott care that China moved in and took our place not in the least despite the fact the Pacific islands were our eyes since before WW2.

Remember the Malaysian plane that went down and Abbott saying we will spend and keep on spending until we find it all the time ignoring what China saw doing because Andrew Robb was there signing a faux agreement. The Americans wanted us to be a bulwark and Abbott ignored them. He let the Chinese set up their man made island not saying a word.

Now and only now is Bolt crying out we are caught with our pants down. They have been down and we have been bent over facing the West because Tony Abbott didn't want to know anything about imperial China. Malcolm Turnbull inherited this situation from Abbott from the get go.  I wrote about it last year when our eyes in the Pacific had gone and the Russian fleet  sailed past. Shirtfronting Abbott hadn't a clue and didn't know what to do.

It's very hard to find a funny conservative and Bolt certainly proves that. All you will discover is a smart arse  a tryhard prick who simply wants to boost Tony Abbott like one of those giant air crows you find outside cheap used car yards. Yes Bolt's  desparately trying to fluff him up according to the Murdoch and IPA plan put in place after Abbott deflated himself.

"  Beijing has already deployed warships there, to tighten its grip, even though the Permanent Court of Arbitration this week ruled its claim over the vast area was illegal. " Bolt .

Bolt who for years hasn't given a rats about the UN or any branch of it who cheered Brexit because the EU represented big government and got in the way of Nationalism and it's unity with corporate power or Fascism suddenly pays attention to the judgement of the Permanent Court of Arbitration. He's the voice of a media hypocrite, clown and propagandist who rails against  the UN, UNHCR and Heritage Council. He is the twat who doesn't want us to have anything to do with any outside counsel or global citizenship other than corporate trade agreements who now is crying over Abbott's spilt milk claiming Turnbull  has set us up by not buying Japanese subs. Yes Andrew those Japanese subs would have been ready by now or even the signing of them would have seen the Chinese back off immediately wouldn't it. However the Conservatives now have another element of fear to spook us with to try to raise Lazarus

The joke is that the Chinese don't need subs to sink Australia they can simply bankrupt us by stop trading. Abbott, Bolt and now Hanson  have  insured the Indonesians and Malaysians have no reason to save us economically as they hate them and made sure they knew it with their media and political rhetoric. Bolt's a joke imagine if the Chinese threatened us the number of internment camps he'd be calling  for to put all those Australians he's paranoid of in. The ones he and Hanson call unwanted the Asians, Middle Easterners and even the indigenous all suspected turncoats. Some 2 million plus more than Germany let in last year all locked away proving Bolt and Hanson's point they might hate us


 

 

 

Andrews: Bring back Abbott

God's Gift to Australia. Is  that dude  blue Murdoch no it's Bolt you idiots.

 

The Real Reason for this blog page. Why are the Conservatives pointing out that  the two appointed to the leadership  are duds? It shows just what a divided faction they really are.