Andrew Bolt's Blog,10/12/18; Poll Tampering; Climate Tamperin; Law Tampering;

TURNBULL'S REVENGE: LIBERALS 45, LABOR 55

Two narratives. This is what comes of getting rid of Malcolm Turnbull, or this is what comes of having let such a vindictive wrecker be Liberal leader in the first place, because see what he's done since: "The final Newspoll [shows] the Coalition’s primary vote at 35 per cent, Labor’s at 41 per cent and a two-party-preferred split of 45-55."

5m
 Bolt's PAYWALL approach to his blog simply shows he's still not really back at work since Friday.

 Australia's fate relies on hiding the fact that the recent history of Australian disasters both cultural, economic and political began with none other than Tony Abbott who in a trade-off with his backers adopted the IPA's 75 point plan for the Nation. We've been on a downhill slide since then and currently, the blame is being directed solely at Malcolm Turnbull. Abbott's boosters News Corp and the IPA remain the most focused on that task. Currently, their goal seems the Liberal Party's failure because the long-term outcome remains the same, the return of Abbott or at least a clone. Promote or hide him the intention is to keep Jack in the box until the next catastrophe an ALP government and then raise him from the grave on the basis of "remember when in 2013".
It's bound to fail just as it did when Murdoch took his boy to the Alfalfa Club in Atlanta to boost him as a global statesman and failed miserably. Bolt tries to make Abbott shine this time around by focussing on Turnbull but can't seem to raise Abbott's stocks no matter what he does. Abbott still today would fail miserably on the preferred PM stakes. But Bolt's not there to win in the short term he's there to distract deflect and distort on a daily basis right or wrong to just keep going until the electorate forgets yet again.

FINKEL WAS RIGHT FIRST TIME: 'VIRTUALLY NOTHING'

Column I wrote that Alan Finkel, our Chief Scientist, had said that Australia could stop all its carbon dioxide emissions and the difference to the climate would be “virtually nothing”. He bow says this was a "complete misrepresentation of my position”. But the video, the facts and the logic are all against him.

16m

 Whoa just because Finkel can be quoted as having said the words the context isn't that clear the way Bolt has presented it. Is the conversation referred to about the total combined global action or just Australia's? It seems the world is calling for a greater combined reduction of emissions than 1.3%  The context of the question is so truncated that the reply really is open to distortion.
 Further, does it mean Andrew Bolt hasn't said the same over and over again for the past decade? He's been a public denier about global action being a waste of time. Australian action so small as not to matter. Yes, many scientists have said the same despite their calling for further immediate and even greater effort on emissions reduction. Everyone has admitted and agreed damage is done and has already passed the tipping point but not everyone agrees it can't be slowed in the long term like Andrew Bolt commentator and lobbyist for Fossil Fuel interests who have said there no point in doing anything because man-made climate change is really a trivial part of Climate Change as a whole. 
There is a major difference between the context of Finkel and Bolt's comments and the fact remains Bolt does say emissions reduction targets are a global waste of time and money. He was once an advocate of spending the money on the concept of clean-coal an oxymoron if ever there was one.

JUDGE ROBS MEDIA OF CATHOLIC PREY

Column Yes there is a media witch hunt to convict Catholic priests, and Judge Roy Ellis called it out. He had just quashed a dubious conviction against former archbishop Philip Wilson, and noted: "The mere presence of large amounts of media from all around Australia and the world carries with it a certain amount of pressure on the court.”

13m
A "witch hunt to convict Catholic priests" British Law it seems is a form of Sharia Law and priests should be somehow excluded from it. Well, they have been by and large for hundreds of years. Now their actions are being tested. The media attention and influence isn't what's being tested its the Archbishop's complicity in not disclosing criminal molestation and his degree of knowledge outside of the confessional. But it seems law is not what's important to Bolt guilt and innocence to be better judged by opinion. He's certainly lead the vigilante cry against Sudanese in this country and ha called for collective punishment of various groups he's chosen to fixate on. 

PUT YOUR OWN ARGUMENTS, DON'T BOYCOTT MINE

An academic tries to get Sky News boycotted and won't simply argue back when challenged: "Edith Cowan University...  confirmed it was aware of prolific tweeting by Andrew Priest, a lecturer in accounting at its business and law school who supports a boycott campaign... Priest did not respond to a request for comment." Is debate allowed in class?

3m
What luxury Bolt and Goebell's had with access to their own arena for debate. Bolt doesn't debate he generally changes the meaning such that debate becomes meaningless and he can then say "I win". Bolt says he's indigenous more so than Adam Goodes. When blogging writing and editorialising he's not debating but he's talking nonsense. However, when he actually takes his rant and tries it on as he did with the ex-PM of NZ James Bolger he becomes the fool he is and is reduced to childlike silence. When similar circumstances occur in his own arena the Bolt Report as happened with James Matheson Bolt says times up we need to move on but will have you back very soon to continue. It doesn't happen.
Notice Bolt doesn't offer to debate others outside his own arena he's not offering a public forum. His idea on debating could be between a Russian and himself without an interpreter and in so many cases he tries to alter the syntax and meaning of words so much that it might as well be between peoples of a foreign language. In this case, Bolt's not arguing with Andrew Priest he's actually arguing about Priests right to Twitter. A priest doesn't have to argue back in his efforts to Boycott Sky News or argue in Bolt's arena. Sleeping Giants are entitled to run Boycott's on Bolt. They are free not to argue a case on Bolt's Show because the audience isn't great and possibly isn't the people they want to reach. Andrew Priest isn't addressing Andrew Bolt, by the way, he's addressing the system that allows Bolt and his ilk so much privilege not to debate but simply promote messages of less than dubious quality for the unsuccessful purpose currently of persuasion. His advertisers need to look at the value for money Sky News actually generates.

NASA: ANTARTIC IS ADDING ICE, NOT LOSING

ANOTHER DUD SCARE Didn't they say the science was settled?: "A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow... is currently adding enough ice... to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers. The research challenges... the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s 2013 report, which says that Antarctica is overall losing land ice."

24m
So scepticism is abuse according to Bolt who pulls out a report based on Altimetry. and concludes 
it to be better than the IPCC report of 2013. Why didn't he point out the problems with this report when peer-reviewed by other scientists. Where they being sceptics or abusers? Bolt tries to hold himself up as an intelligent sceptic yet fundamentally ignores the methodology applied in the report to those he flags as the answer to the claim the seas are rising. Most of that research, by the way, was in Arctica and not Antarctica. Bolt's not a sceptic he is an abuser and a denier. But even more, his efforts are to confuse and try to show Science isn't doing its job.

“The good news is that Antarctica is not currently contributing to sea level rise, but is taking 0.23 millimetres per year away,” Zwally said. “But this is also bad news. If the 0.27 millimetres per year of sea level rise attributed to Antarctica in the IPCC report is not really coming from Antarctica, there must be some other contribution to sea level rise that is not accounted for.”
“The new study highlights the difficulties of measuring the small changes in ice height happening in East Antarctica,” said Ben Smith, a glaciologist with the University of Washington in Seattle who was not involved in Zwally’s study.

"Doing altimetry accurately for very large areas is extraordinarily difficult, and there are measurements of snow accumulation that need to be done independently to understand what’s happening in these places,” Smith said. 
To help accurately measure changes in Antarctica, NASA is developing the successor to the ICESat mission, ICESat-2, which is scheduled to launch in 2018. “ICESat-2 will measure changes in the ice sheet within the thickness of a No. 2 pencil,” said Tom Neumann, a glaciologist at Goddard and deputy project scientist for ICESat-2. “It will contribute to solving the problem of Antarctica’s mass balance by providing a long-term record of elevation changes.”

MACRON ASKED FOR CLIMATE 'FIGHT'. HE GOT ONE

Last year President Emmanuel Macron urged warmists to come fight in France after the US junked the Paris deal on global warming: "To all scientists, engineers, entrepreneurs, responsible citizens... Come and work here with us... on concrete solutions for our climate... France will not give up the fight." Yes, but they're now fighting against him.

1hLink

 Remember Joe Hockey and the fuel tax. He said it wouldn't hurt the poor because they don't drive far or have cars. He said he was taxing the rich and nobody bought it. Abbott showed him the door and it had nothing to do with Climate Change.

  Isn't this typical Bolt. No doubt Paris is a 'war zone' but to conflate cost of living riots, opportunistic thugs out for a days violence with  Climate Change and criticisms of Trump is to make out the world is such a simple place and sovereign states are so easily understood when Bolt has been unable or has denied the drubbing the Liberals got in Victoria had anything to do with conservative political policies obstructing the LNP from functioning and the public was sick of it. That's too simplistic to explain Victoria but France and Macron are easy.
Macron blasted Trump for cutting research and reporting in the US and offered scientists a home to continue their work in France. Bolt's joy in conflation is "the rioters" who are rioting about the cost of living, youth unemployment, and other grievances. Conservative reports have been as imaginative as Andrew Bolt some falsely claiming the rioters were actually calling for Trump More Than a Thousand Arrested as Yellow Vests Protests Over Economic Frustration Rage on Across France

Trump Uses Paris Protests as an Opportunity to Blast International Climate Agreement

 
The Palestinians have demonstrated every weekend fo a change in Climate and have never got more than over 200 dead and thousands wounded and that is a more accurate conflation than Bolt ever offers
Israeli Army Snipers Wound another 33 Palestinians on Friday March of Return

Andrew Bolt's Blog,14/6/17; Manus Class Action Win; Emissions Tax and it's purpose is all in the name. It's not broken English; Cassie Jaye poor film grasping at straws; Bolt agrees with ISIS British law is dead; Finkel figures and Bolt logic;

Manus Island class action: government to compensate former detainees in huge settlement

The Australian government has agreed to compensate 1900 asylum seekers currently or formerly held at the Manus Island detention centre, in what may be Australia's largest ever human rights-related settlement.

 

A MURDEROUS HATRED OF TRUMP

How insane with hatred is the anti-Trump Left?: "The Public Theater is refusing to back down after backlash over its production of "Julius Caesar" that portrays a Donald Trump-like dictator in a business suit with a long tie who gets knifed to death onstage."  

Obama was stabbed time and time again his wife called an ape as was Hilary Clinton killed and shot in so many symbolic ways by Conservative commentators like Andrew Bolt as were all women by  Donald Trump. At the time Bolt let them all pass to the wicket keeper. Conservatives can give it but they can't  take it and when they get caught out all they do is pout  and shut up. 
Did anyone see Bolt comment on the sacking of Roger Ailes or Bill O'Reilly at Fox? Did he even comment on their poor behavior when first reported? How about Trumps tweets and locker room banter just a ho ho ho from a Caesar or maybe a Nero? 
Julius Caesar was Shakespeare's hero and was praised not mourned by Mark Antony maybe Bolt should have considered for the part of Antony in the play. After all he incessantly praised Abbott even when the whole world was laughing at him a global lefty conspiracy no doubt. Trump is just another Abbott. They like Bolt apologize  like Paul Ryan promising a change that as with Abbott never comes. Bolt just kept apologizing for Australia's dead man walking PM's performance promising  self-realization and a rebirth that never came. In the end, Bolt went silent.
Einstien defined insanity repeating the same actions and expecting a different outcome it's what Andrew Bolt did and keeps on doing as does Sean Spicer for Trump nothing changes. Neuro -Plasticity indicates that if you repeat the same mistakes over and over and have been thinking that way at length you brain changes. I've always said the suit was a disguise for Bolt  and the real Bolt revealed himself when he was ready to kill two pranksters now that wasn't a Shakespearean play that was reality

WHAT ARE THE LIBERALS FOR IF THEY AGREE TO TURNBULL'S CARBON TAX?

My editorial from The Bolt Report - what are the Liberals for if they agree to Malcolm Turnbull's new carbon tax?

1) The Emissions Tax is about policies that can be negotiated and bills that can be passed. It's certainly not just about broken English. It's about values moving forward about do's not don'ts it's about right and not just a need to retain a plunging bottom line.

2) Australians want to move on and not lag behind the rest of the world. Labor lost the election that Abbott never won and the ambiance of this country changed with a leader that everyone kept apologizing for even Andrew Bolt. The problem, the apology is used as an excuse.

3) Emissions regulation is more than just a Carbon Tax it's an investment into a cleaner future that realizes Climate Change is a problem but Clean Energy is value worth fighting for

4) Industry, Finance, and Australians are all for progress which only comes with certainty and political stability. Conservatives don't play or believe in the "we" game of a nation.

5) Investment  will only follow where the path to the future is certain and it currently isn't in coal globally. The future is not in coal as communications wasn't in copper wire and Abbott's Nope to Labor's NBN

6) The Liberals may just have come to learn they work for us Australians and not just their donors or lobby groups like the IPA. that the nation wants more than just a political party fighting among it's own members resulting in the regressive thinking of the past 3 years. That's not Turnbull either it was Tony Abbott leader of Australia's DUP equivalent.

7) Should Abbott win be prepared for Andrew Bolt to be seen celebrating the win raising an ISIS flag in much the same way the DUP celebrated Theresa May's Loss.

DUP man celebrated election with photo of terror group flag in ...

 

CASSIE JAYE ON HOW WALEED AND O'KEEFE AMBUSHED HER

Cassie Jaye is an American who made a film, The Red Pill, about the men’s movement.  I’ve said before how this film - serious, balanced - has been banned here by some cinemas. Now Jaye has been attacked by TV hosts who lectured her, heckled her and made false claims about a movie they hadn’t seen. She told me Australia is unbelievable.  Watch.

As once said in a great film Cool Hand Luke and I quote " What we have here is a failure to communicate" Waleed reviewed Cassie Jaye's film for what it was and Andrew Bolt just promoted it. What he promoted, however, was weak journalism, confused filmmaking and a grab for a dollar. It hardly flipped the sociological feminist argument in favor of men nor has it turned Cassie Jaye into another Michael Moore or John Pilger. It has however made Bolt's little production seem like users with no original ideas of their own. Bolt often uses Waleed Aly's show as a stepping stone for his simply flipping the ideas. Is his production dept so lacking in them? I think not but they are more likely to be under Bolt's instructions.
 He needn't worry CH10 is going broke because the Murdochs won't any longer guarantee it's loans. They don't want to buy it but do want to get Sky News and friends on free to air. Maybe it will happen next year when the media laws have been scrapped.  Bolt could follow Waleed and grab some leftover ratings.
UPDATE 
So since Ch10 was put in the hands of the Administrators today Murdoch's are moving in with a "rescue package" or should I say the hyenas are there the first at the table. Yes, the same Murdoch's who refused to guarantee Ch 10's loans in the first place. What are the chances of a change to the media laws and Sky News being put in place of the current news dept? Editorialized misinformation brought to you at the hands of Rupert Murdoch. Maybe we will see Bolt feasting on the leftovers of Waleeds audience earlier than anticipated and presenting the IPA/ Abbott hour tonight

BRANDIS FREES CONVICTED TERRORIST EARLY

Much anti-terrorism posturing is just striking attitudes - bollards, tougher citizenship tests. Then this: "Attorney-General George Brandis granted parole to a convicted terrorist just weeks before Malcolm Turnbull and his cabinet launched an all-out assault on the judiciary over what they claimed was its soft treatment of violent extremists."

  Bolt believes in Fascist sentencing "At the Governers Pleasure" He no longer believes in British Law but is more in favor of the Despotic variety" Guilty until proven Innocent"

 

FINKEL REPORT'S FUNNY FIGURES

The Turnbull Government is pushing the Finkel report as a miracle that would give us lots more renewable energy - an amazing 42 per cent of our electricity - by 2030 without higher power prices or more blackouts. But this graph suggests it's just making stuff up.

  Let me point out there is no verifiable link in Bolt's show of figures. Nor does it appear that there is any logic as his little copy of Finkel's chart aren't lined up. As for the % increase in 3 years to double isn't that unbelievable when it's only an increase of 75% and over 33 years an increase of 600%. It seems the rate of increase will be dependent on the investment gold rush and by 2050 much higher than 54%. I don't relly understand the point Bolt is making given the energy producers want political certainty so they can plan their investment strategy. I thought Bolt hated political control over the market? It appears he calling for more.
 Not everyone realizes the benefits of cheap Coal

As of the first of January this year, all public transport trains in the Netherlands are being powered by renewable energy, namely from wind power. There's currently a total of 2,200 wind turbines across the country, which generate enough power to sustain the equivalent of 2.4 million homes.
Source: All Dutch Trains Now Run on 100% Wind Power

MORE BOLLARDS HERE, TOO?

Bollards are put up at Federation Square and Bourke St Mall by politicians pretending to make us seem safe from being run down. Just as predicted, some ratbag just picks another spot: "Pedestrians were forced to flee as a car drove along the footpath in Melbourne’s CBD and smashed into banks,

before crashing at Crown Casino last night."

 Generalized Bolt picks an event looks at his crystal balls and creates a conclusion to explain all events or reject the explanation of experts. Orlando the FBI is wrong, Man Monis The psychiatrists and courts were wrong, Zacky  Mullah the Law was wrong. All these single and disconnected events have one explanation for Bolt and any others wrong. As far as Bolt logic is concerned smoking doesn't cause cancer and CO2 is not a Green House Gas and Muslims in the main aren't innocent.

 Bolt's arguments are simply based on the probability of a win in an argument and if a win isn't possible to simply confuse the issue. Free speech is to do with reasoned logic and discussion and not just tipping the table over and making a noise nor is it defended by violence where we actually saw bollards stop Bolt. They were in the form of tables and chairs.

More posts

 

 

MORE EVIDENCE OF A DANGEROUS IMMIGRATION POLICY

Our refugee program brought in the men behind the last four terrorist attacks here. Now a man on a bridging visa is accused of kidnap, rape and forced Islamic marriage. And police are looking for men of Middle Eastern appearance after another Sydney shoot-out.

This is an event that happens in Australia on a regular basis where drama, rape, and violence occur no matter the religion. The only difference in this narrative is  Religion is given a greater profile as is the visa status of the man. Generally, these remain incidental data to a media story.  Needless to say, Bolt link is The Daily Telegraph making it a News Corp beat up. Had the story not been about Muslims religion would never have been mentioned and Bolt would have ignored it. 

 

WHY TURNBULL'S GREEN PLAN IS DESTROYING THE LIBERALS

The Turnbull Government is destroying itself by touting the Finkel report with its renewable energy target of a ludicrous 42 per cent. The Liberal party room must water it down, if not block it. Turnbull will then fight Labor with a compromise on his own green beliefs. He will fight having conceded the argument to Labor. No wonder he faces revolt.

The whole of Bolt's post is about an argument nothing to do with right or wrong it's about how to win or lose an argument and compromise isn't an option. It's why Abbott could never run a government because all he ever did was want to run an argument. Australians don't want debates abstracted from reality it's why the Conservatives and Hanson are fast becoming recognized for what they are. Obstructionists to negotiation compromise and the passing of bills. It's what we pay for. It's what Julia Gillard did despite the obsessive arguments going on around her.

WILL SHE FIT IN THE LIFT

"Body shaming by Mamamia: "Will she fit in the lift?" Bolt trying to take the high ground

Oh dear, remember the days of Julia Gillard and the Bolt commentaries his cackling about Gillard from behind the Conservatives were a Greek chorus.  Bolt was big on his "frightbats" and his shaming of so many women he never apologized once. What we have here is a clear case of the pot calling the kettle black. The man lied about his ex-fiance and was forced yes forced to say "sorry". There is no moral high ground that Andrew Bolt can take on this subject of shaming either women or men. Did anybody notice the high Bolt got out of his Carlton brawling the story is in pictures above?

 

Andrew Bolt's Blog,1/12/15; Why is Andrew Bolt trying to remind us of the worst of Tony abbott?; Bolt love good whiskey, Music , Art, a Peter Jackson look and the Shane Warne model of Foreign Aid and Welfare; Islam the excuse for israeli and the West's misjudgement; The conservative great hope needs manufacturing because there is none; Law is only good for some sometimes; It's not Islam Bolt but all you do is speak & never listen;

 

 

Mal Brough wrong. Channel 9 did not doctor his confession

" Turnbull made Brough a minister as a reward for his help in plotting against Abbott. Will he now admit he made an error?"Bolt

The only thing strange about any of this is Bolt deflecting any dirt away from Tony Abbott because of his association with Mal Brough in the character assassination of Peter Slipper by Brough and Ashby. The dirty deeds and Tony Abbott's refusal to exonerate Slipper as he did himself and MPs for sticking their noses deep in the trough always appeared little more than a vindictive set up by the man who on a previous occasion had Pauline Hanson goaled. Mal Brough up until now  seemed to have got away with destroying Slipper escaped any stench. Why is Bolt is now attaching historic claims about Brough to Turnbull? To take the focus off Abbott of course. "will he now admit he made and error? What error would that be Andrew Bolt  promoting the Abbott ally and hitman Brough?  Dirty deeds done dirt cheap and and gun for hire Abbott's Mal Brough thought he'd got away with it.

 It shows Malcolm Turnbull is staunch. He wasn't about to hang a man on past  rumors alone. It also shows he had no animosity towards Abbott's associates. That are admirable qualities in a leader. What we do clearly see however is Bolt trying to pin the tail on the donkey trying to make our PM his personal pinata but missing and making a fool of himself in the effort.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Murdoch: weakened by the Left in the fight against terrorism

 

Murdoch's speech was introduced by Kissinger to a "hawkish think tank crowd" There was no criticism of GOP there certainly not any of the candidates that's for sure

 First rule of News corp is suck up to the boss and let him know you said the exactly what he said but  before him. That always been the Bolt Credo suck up to the boss. It's not true looka at todays blog and even yesterdays Andrew Bolt is ashamed of Australian institions we are a country ruled by the left. According to him the Government, the Law , Immigration, Education, the Arts, Media etc have all been taken over by the left and the country is going to the dogs. How on earth can he say he is like Murdoch whose speech celebrated America. Just run down his blogs  and ask yourself what single positive thing did Andrew Bolt have to say today?

 Oh Yes one my boss delivered an awsome  speech. I'm Andrew Bolt Mr Murdoch.

 

 

 

Liberals at war: Abbott accuses Bishop of falsehoods

Turnbull is not weak. Andrew Bolt's carping over the past weeks certainly doesn't make him a friend of the party or government. Bolt has been trying to give Julie Bishop's reputation a battering and has spent several weeks promoting the myth that a major division exists 9 Conservatives make a significant number.

 Given the history of Abbott's broken promises made before the 2013 election and those broken during reign as leader Bishop soars head and shoulders over him when it comes to trust. If what Abbott says is true  his dignity is lost he has no stature. If false he really looks a person unworthy of being a Conservative leader let alone the party leader. Basically Bolt makes Abbott look a loser either way with his simpering.  There seems little backbone in Bolt's declaration of "war". It remins us that Abbott had Hanson jailed  and later said sorry which didn't wash. He tried to do the same to his once mate Peter Slipper as well an sent him mad. Abbott might have a scrappers instinct but definitely not a leaders.

 

 

 

 

How well is Turnbull really doing?

What Bolt fails to deliver is that the the Greens and independents have  11 and 9 points  between them leaving the LNP with a 9 point lead over Labour hardly a challenge. When Bolt is lost for words you know his argument is weak

 

 

Sexism alert: abusive Clementine Ford applauds sacking of abusive man

It seems Bolt doesn't appreciate women acting as  the equals of bawdy men swearing aside  Bolt may not be bawdy but he's done much the same  and has  gone out of his way to have people sacked 3  come to mind in the past 18 months. Here Bolt  the provocateur is  provoked and calling for the sacking of Ford.What can be more pathetic than  listening to Bolt the media bully, vilifier, ultra racist  plead "Why are there no consequences for Ford’s actions?" We  may well ask the same question of  News Corp  however without the lilting whine.

 

 

 

 

 

   Global Warming ‘Pause’ Was A Myth All Along, Says New Study | IFLScience

" To reduce the confusion, we were exclusively concerned with the first question: is there, or has there recently been, a pause or hiatus in warming? It is this question – and only this question – that we answer with a clear and unambiguous “no”."

 

 

 

 

 

If Bhutan is the warmists’ “role model”, start worrying

Bolt's slap down  and scoffs at Bhutan but fails to mention that it's in fact a 75% exporter of clean energy, electricity, to India which accounts for 19% of it's GDP. 

Yes it's a developing country and it's coaless. The fact that it is a developing country seems a joke to Bolt. Who actually believes by importing coal generated electricity their lifestyle problems would all be solved overnight. 

 Bolt loves to turn peoples social problems in on themselves and he laughs at their disadvantage. Because they aren't more like us. He'd believes it would be better if they allowed developers to strip their current land mass of 75% forests one generation at least might profit for the short term. What other resources can be rapidly plundered by rapacious foreign companies? Bolt's cynical attitude to poor nations like Bhutan says more about him than them. "Let’s check the happiness factor in the warmists’ “role model”, which lacks the wicked emissions of a thriving economy." Bolt  

 The long term ambition and GNH measure is something the people of Bhutan are proud of along with their culture. But then Bolt is proud of his ability as well to over consume and dispose of the food ,  the whiskey,  art and the Peter Jackson look he holds so dear. Bolt hates state run Charity he prefers the Shane Warne Model when it comes to Foreign Aid and Welfare. 

"With an estimated capacity of 30 GW, hydropower is the mainstay of the electricity sector, and also the main source of revenues for the Government, as it accounts for 19% of total GDP (Second National Communication). Bhutan is a net exporter of electricity, even though 40% of the population does not have access to it (Irena, Country profiles, 2009 data). In fact, the high cost of grid extension (roughly 14000 U$ per Km) has hindered energy access domestically. As a result, 75% of domestic electric capacity is exported to India (Dorji et al. 2012). In such a context, in 2005, the Government implemented the “Rural Electrification Master Plan“, which aims to achieve a 100% electrification rate. Despite emissions from electricity generation being negligible (as the hydropower is considered as carbon-neutral), further extension of the existing grid capacity will lead to higher GHG emissions.  If the grid emission factor is accounted for, emissions from electricity sector are projected to reach 2.2 MtCO2 in 2020 (Second National Communication). Also the cement industry is an important driver of GHG emissions that could reach 1.4 MtCO2 in 2020, if additional policies will be not put in place (Second National Communication)."


Bolt advice cut down your trees and well supply you with Coal and a couple of doctors as a throw in depending how much they cost. Do you know Bhutan has dengue fever it's a growing disease in Australia particularly Qld ask Andrew if rid our selves of trees we might nip that problem in the bud.

 

 

 

Europe grants Turks easier entry

" Some 850,000 people [illegal immigrants] have entered the European Union this year, more than half of them landing in Greece…"

Bolt pays respect to immigration figures like he does his principles they are all over the place.  Germany was to take 1.5 million, then 1 million, now the whole of the EU has 850,000 or approximately a flood of 0.1% Hardly the figures that collapsed the Roman empire. Given Bolt's high of 1.5 million Can we assume 650,000 have all gone catching  boats back?

 588 million tourists arrived in the EU in 2014 reaching an expected 610 million in 2015 Now that's a flood and a very welcomed one. However with regard the free flow of Turks to the EU can we assume that there is no real problem with ISIS as Turkey assists them with their battle against the Kurds and Assad. That in fact we have just been propagandizing an enemy which we really support? Something smells very fishy in this deal with Turkey. Given that Bolt doesn't raise it it's even fishier. Putin certainly has.

 

 

 

Bernard Keane’s contempt for soldiers who served this nation  

"Keane owes Nikolic and Hastie an apology."He certainly doesn't owe these young men an apology they are fine examples however of the futility of war. Each and every war fought by Australians since WW2 apart maybe for East Timor was lost.

 We talk of 'well trained soldiers' but not intelligent ones. Furthermore  we've seen the contempt Andrew Bolt holds for Major Colonel Andrew Wilkie simply because he pointed to the lies being delivered us by John Howard in sending us to Iraq.

 

 

Why aren’t these “refugees” fighting like the Kurds?

It's quite simple Andrew Bolt Muslims realize it's not Islam but politics driving the war between clans and tribes. That there are  significantly different political drivers in Iraq and Syria. Why is Turkey bombing the Andrew Kurds their Sunnis and allies Andrew? It's not Islam!!!!

 Why aren't Australian Christians up in arms over the massacre at the abortion clinic in the US. Because white  Christian terrorism they know is not about Christianity. Why aren't  Jews marching against Israeli support of Al-Qaeda in Syria? Because the know it's not anything to do with Judaism. Why are Muslims with some 190 langauages and 60 nationalities not up in arms because it's not Islam Andrew Bolt.  Only you who deliver you ignorance of them says it is.  So to repeat why aren't Christian's up in arms about the ludicrous statements of GOP candidates? Because it's not Christianity it's politics and politics these days as you often make clear has no principles.

 

 

Pick which way is best: speaking honestly about Islam, speaking like Burke and Dreyfus?

Let's speak the truth about Islam in the modern day. In Saddam's Iraq pre- invasion 90% of children went to school and not to madrasas but to secular schools. Girls were educated, the hijab was not compulsory and women worked not in just in menial jobs but in the professions. They drove cars and could go out unescorted. Yes Saddam was a strong armed fascist dictator. Much like the ones the US tolerated in Latin America.  Like Tito in Yugoslavia he held  the country together and it functioned as a Secular Islamic State with a national identity the majority of the country recognized Iraq.

Post 2003 and the invasion called on by the born again Christian neocons Bush Blair and Howard under the guise of the great lie about WMDs  and against the advice of Intelligence with and for the unmentioned support of Israel's fear of the growth of Secular Arab Nationalism  they invaded Iraq. Of course they also  needed oil which would pay for the US lead war along with the business it created. 

 1 million Iraqis were left dead and injured and half the country displaced 60% of the children a generation are now left uneducated Medical facilities in tatters women to frightened to go out. The coalition set back a nation  not to the middle ages but to poverty anarchy and tribal discontent chaos under the Shiia fist of the fabricated US supported faux government of Malaki. The US coalition created the political vacuum anarchy, chaos, tribal revenge and allowed for the growth of fundamentalism to be used where it didn't exist before all for the sake of  self interest and politics not Islam. Islam became their excuse to hide behind a gross error of judgement. As it became a tool to be used to recruit and pay for a lost generation of uneducated kids whose average age today is 27 and who need families to feed. The US and Israel prefer this state than one with a singular nationalistic bent an access to weapons and the  army of a single state. What they didn't tell us was the same  rational would occur in Libya, Egypt and Syria wherever secular dictatorships existed and armies were growing

Islam today has become the excuse for the US coalition and Israeli failure. The  plan to destroy the growth of Secular Arab Nationalism across the Middle East and Nth Africa has got out of control.  Where there was once secular education these Western Neocons drove the kids into the hands of the madrasas used now as tools for the win at all cost extremists the Sunni rebellion they support but can't control as they thought they could. Israel who created this war by proxy is no better off  a Shiia crescent stretching from Iran/Iraq/ Syria and to Lebanon. Any wonder it wants a war with Iran and is actively helping AL-Qaeda in Syria.

 To talk of Islam as the villain  in all of this is to say Judaism is the villan in the actions of Israel or Christianity is to blame for white terror, the KKK, the Anti -Abortion terror in the US. Or that Christianity is to blame for maniacal claims of the current Republican base. For Christ-sake Trump ,Carson etc use Christianity for their political purpose and that's what's dangerous.

Yes it's time we stopped speaking about Islam but started to listen to it and Australia is a good start if only the Bolt's of this country allowed them to get a word in. Former Military Chief: Iraq War Was A 'Failure' That Helped Create ISIS

 

 

 

 

Who is your big hope of the conservative side?

There is no hope on the conservative side of politics because as with the extreme left reasoned thinking and debate fly out the window. I don't know what Frydenberg stands for but Bolt is certainly defining him for his own purpose and dumping him in it as head Conservative. Does Frydenberg know he's a tool? Bolt's exaggeration of "So many Liberals are Conservatives and standing up against Turnbull" is as believable as his claim of the 18 year hiatus in global warming. The truth of  Bolt is however  the disgusting crass front page of the Herald Sun yesterday screaming "Islam must Change". 

Remember when Bolt went into fits about Zacky Mullah being a terrorist supporter, a supporter of the rebel Al -Nusra Front. Josh Frydenberg is and so is Andrew Bolt  because they both support Israel who assists the AL-Nusra Front in their fight against Assad. In fact they not only supply them with weapons but act as a defacto air force for  bombing Assad's military out posts while land grabbing and stealing the Golan heights. Will Shari Markson confirm what Israel wants kept secret on the Bolt Report?  These hypocrites attack a Muslim on the ABC for speaking his truth as they do the Grand Mufti but they never mention the truth in their statements. Who are the two faced pricks

 

Remember when Bolt went into fits about Zacky Mullah being a terrorist supporter, a supporter of the rebel Al -Nusra Front. Josh Frydenberg is and so is Andrew Bolt  because they both support Israel who assists the AL-Nusra Front in their fight against Assad. In fact they not only supply them with weapons but act as a defacto air force for  bombing Assad's military out posts while land grabbing and stealing the Golan heights. Will Shari Markson confirm what Israel wants kept secret on the Bolt Report?  These hypocrites attack a Muslim on the ABC for speaking his truth as they do the Grand Mufti but they never mention the truth in their statements. Who are the two faced pricks.'Huge Error': Former US Military Chief Admits Iraq Invasion Spawned ISIS

 

 

 

 

Standing up for the law - and for our culture

 " It is important that on all fronts we now stand up for our culture. We cannot keep teaching the children of immigrants that Australia is a racist and land-raping country founded on theft and genocide, even stealing the children of Aboriginal parents"

Bolt is demanding the death of democracy we must close our eyes and take it up the arse for Queen and Country. It's time to accept we are a United Patriotic Front UPF. The problem with that is Bolt will continue to exclude those he declares liars and  tell us  about those that don't belong. If Indigenous close your eyes bend over and shut up it's not happening. Our teachers must train all kids to believe that as they might just grow up to find it's not true.

 

"ISLAMIC extremist Milad bin Ahmad-Shah al-Ahmadzai could face contempt charges"

As for Andrew Bolt declaring  Milad bin Ahmad-Shah al-Ahmadzai  guilty for testing his right of "free speech" in a courtroom by calling him an "Islamic Extremist" even before the judge has made her decision he'd be declared in contempt if said in the court itself.  Bolt saw himself entitled to whinge about the court process when applied to him finding him guilty of racism but he doesn't defend Ahmad- Shah expressing his right.  His hypocrisy alone justifies him not being heard  

 

 

 

 

Turnbull promises $1 billion of your money to global warming scare

No Andrew Bolt Journalist and media have said quite enough reporting the Science it's time for Scientists  to report the findings of peer reviewed  science not persons like yourself who seem to be hysterically involved in reporting something quite other than scientific findings. Scientific method has been the most prudent epistemological means we have devised for discovering the world around us. When there is a 97% consensus of those in the field to the peer-reviewed testing of the results provided. The 3% are as you say left out and in the cold so as to speak excuse the pun.  So yes let the scientists debate  the issue and give proportionate time to each. I believe it's what 196 national leaders have been listening to and not Andrew Bolt who tends to cherry pick findings to suit his very unscientific generalizations to prove science is only secondary to profit.

Remember when Bolt thought Greg Hunt was such a great Minister how the worm turns.

No matter what Bolt's daughter says about herself and schoolies week Bolt won't listen. He will tell her what's best for her as he does everyone. It's NZ or nothing kid.

 

 

 

 

 

Fairfax admits its papers are part of a warmist lobby group

"That makes Fairfax papers - The Age and Sydney Morning Herald - just propaganda sheets for an activist group pushing global warming. Do not expect any balance or impartiality in their coverage. " 

It would be funny if coming from anyone other than Andrew Bolt Global Warming ‘Pause’ Was A Myth All Along, Says New Study | IFLScience

Andrew Bolt's Blog,19/11/15; Israelis plant knives on Palestinians; Bolt's trolls and Syrian politics; Bolt continues to misquote Abbott; Bolt abuses but doesn't reason; Abuse is easy not intelligent; Tent Preacher declares himself Prophet; Bolt a wiser man than a Mufti or a Pope; The law according to Bolt needs to be less systematic.

 

 

Obama tells Turnbull not to keep him in dark: “Let us know next time.”

Link Murdoch's AFR headline  

'Let us know next time': How Obama chided Turnbull over Darwin port sale

Andre Bolts conclusion

 "Of course “sources” would say it was friendly."

What a prick Andrew Bolt is and you couldn't expect him to be anything but a low life putting a negative spin on anything Malcolm Turnbull does simply because Rupert Murdoch and he have a past. It beggars belief that Bolt can spin a story with such negative innuendo. Given the poor reputation Tony Abbott gave us when it came to foreign policy. Malcolm Turnbull was wise the shrug off the incident. Turnbull and President Hilary Clinton will also continue have a wonderful relationship after 2016. It really doesn't bear well for Murdoch's future print profits or his ability to steal ABC digital.

The reality we are an independent country. The US has a military capacity in 174 countries. Many of which are secret and not known to the rest of the world or us. All however are there to maintain an influence. Are we actually informed of those relationships, not at all. Given many of these relationships are covert and commercial in their government contracts Bolt's OMG posturing are little more than spin. Spin with little reality to truth. Ask your self this When the Americans have just sined another $1.29 billion arms contract with the Saudis were we informed. Ask yourself how is it ISIS without planes or drones continues to have access to shiny new Western world weapons then ask yourself have we ever been informed?Then ask your self how naieve was Andrew Bolt when he tried to push Tony Abbott into the extreme right wing position that even Abbott refused to answer or agree with?

 

 

 

Claim: Islamic State supporters stab Jew in France

  "The teacher was stabbed by three people claiming to be supporters of Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL, Marseille prosecutors said."That's sufficient for Bolt to promote the claim because ISIS supporters always tell the truth. It couldn't be hoons.
Claim Back at you Andrew Bolt the Israeli army is planting knives on Palestinians they have killed and even arrested. So can I leap to the conclusion taht
the more Jews in Israel the less safe are Palestinians?
Do the math and body count ask who is more terrified. Allegations Arise That Israeli Soldiers May Be Planting Knives on Palestinians - Truthdig

 

Fleeing, not fighting for their country

  “Is it too much to ask that the Syrians lead the fight to retake Syria?” 

So who is Andrew Bolt referring to? Assad or the rebels or neither just Syrians in general? It appears it's just Syrians all cowards.  Is Bolts troll referring to those being bombed? None in Damascus of course. So are they those we once supported and gave weapons to for over 3 years or those we have double crossed and are now bombing. Do Bolt trolls even know where Syria is. Are Syrian politics too hard to fathom and fatuous comments easy? Bolt certainly doesn't care they are all Muslims it's why he posted it. 

 "If you don't like refugees maybe you shouldn't support having their countries destroyed to the point of having nothing being left to stay for."

 

 

 

 

Column - Bishop’s verbaling of Abbott suggests she can’t defend Turnbull’s strange plan

 Bolt's like a dog with rabies barking and frothing at the mouth ready to attack anyone and everyone. He head bangs the wheels of passing cars. Tony Abbott distinctly opposed Andrew Bolt's every suggestion on Sunday's Bolt Report including the one suggesting more soldiers are needed in the Middle East than we have already. Furthermore it was Abbott wh said the  decision was not in the hands of Australia. What doesn't Bolt  understand it's quite clear and simple. Bolt simply refuses to acknowledge what Abbott actually said on the Bolt Report preferring to quote Abbott's past statements as if nothing has changed. Why might that be? Keeping us up to date is not in Bolt's interest. Saying what Bolt wants is and using whatever means he wants to support it also is and it's fine  if it means distorting the actual views of a friend . With a friend like Bolt no need of enemies.

"Yet 15 months of the desultory US-led operation against IS suggest Abbott is right."  is Bolt suggesting that Abbott said we must go it alone? He should replay his  interview with Abbott. He looked the fool.

 

 

Column - If the Mufti represents our Muslims we have a problem

There is no problem with the Mufti whatsoever the problem is all Bolt who simply refuses to accept any opinions other than his. He's called for the sacking of the Pope  and the heads of all our major Cultural institutions. He disparages Indigenous leaders the ABC and leaders of the Arts. He doesn't provide any critiques when he debates he either  comes out with the formulaic comments of a Tea party conservative or just disparages people. In this case as with Waleed Aly it's disparagement without analysis. It's just bullying not worth reading.

This is:

 

 

 

 

Turnbull does a Chamberlain: urges political deal involving Islamic State

What we have here is Bolt calling Turnbull "insane""stupid" "unvengeful" an " Obama" and "pathetically weak ". Is this the sign of a reasoned thinker or a firebrand  preacher. Bolt sounds like the fruit cake general out of Dr Strangelove it was funny when a movie.  Muslims are after his bodily fluids. Bolt wants revenge nothing less w a Guernica, a Dressden even a Hiroshima poured on Raqqa.  Revenge is all he sees  as the solution rather than anything after no compromise will do.

He even  calls on a journalist as ignorant as he is  for support one who claims Syria and Iraq are the same when they aren't.  He also quotes a retired GOP general with political agenda rather than one actively involved in finding a solution to the problem. He might well have asked his postman.

"Meanwhile the farcical air war continues, this time with France pretending to be tough:"

Bolt dreams of John Wayne the Green Beret and wants escalation no political solution for him.

 

 

 

 

No, not “DIY” terrorists. So beware false prophets claiming the Islamic State isn’t a big problem

 Andrew Bolt  declares himself the prophet. By the length of this blog one can guess  it will be a disconnected  cut and paste.  A selection of unconnected events to prove some point that he knows should convince us more  troops are needed on the ground.  Look at me I'm Andrew Bolt.

 So what a surprise to find him jumping around like a flea from one  event to another just to try to discredit  Walleed Aly. He's gone to all this trouble not for any reason but put down Aly. Bolt has even turned to chaos theory and uncorrelated events  to tell us ISIS is an immensly organized force. Don't let Waleed Aly tell you otherwise he is a false prophet and a Muslim to boot with an agenda.  Who out of the two is supporting ISIS here? Aly or Bolt?

"No surprise at all. But maybe it is to Aly, adopted by much of the media as the guru of peace and reason in this age of terror.

"Check again his record of minimising the real threat, and urging us not to resist the Islamic State in Iraq or Syria."

"I really don’t understand why more people in the media aren’t awake to Aly’s record of minimising the threat of Islamism and maximising Western guilt and culpability."

Unfortunately all of Bolt's self promotion as a guru is simply repetitive and is modeled on the tactics of the fascist media of yesteryear . Goebbels blamed the Jews for not only Germany's problems but the world's.  Right wing media groups did the same when Franco was in power. The Communists wanted to destroy the world and they were everywhere  a hidden international force. Like Senator McCarthy the subtext of Bolt's writing is to search for and eradicate Islam because  that's where the Isamists hide. Don't mention politics or that Sunnis are persecuted in Iraq and now in Syria it's Islam. Bolt doesn't do the same in the cases of Christians Bhuddists, Hindus or Israeli terror is not all the same then for Andrew Bolt.  Bolt is literally asking us to tear the house down at home taking control and bomb ISIS back to the stone age in a repeat Guernica in Raqqa. 

So given Bolt's argument ISIS has already won because according to him they are everywhere hidden among Muslims and protected by sympathetic lefties.  That's what Bolt demands we believe  and it's what ISIS wants us to believe. The difference between he and Waleed Aly. Aly doesn't give ISIS the credence Bolt does. He doesn't couch things in such simplistic and ideological terms. He doesn't deny their existence or their intent let alone their wish for the power to achieve their goals. He is far more realistic and reasoned than Bolt. Like radical extremists in Latin America they are dangerous but have not taken over the continent or the radical Hindus in India they exist. Ali doesn't give ISIS the credit Bolt does. That doesn't mean they don't have sympathizers capable of doing domestic damage but neither does it mean a call for the internment of  all Australian Muslims which no doubt Bolt would like.  

This whole long blog is  Bolt grandstanding and disparaging Aly who has far more credibility than he does. When we are faced with incredibly complex situations Bolt simply relies on sweeping generalizations.However this is something he wont tell us.

Is the Bible the same as the Koran? Yes and did plagarism occurr?

 Syrian Passports Found at Paris Attacks Scene Confirmed Fake AnonHQ

 

 

 

 

Much that passes as idealism is disguised hatred or disguised love of power

How is it Andrew Bolt is little more than a Fox News Parrot. He has no ideas of his own only those he imports from right wing central Fox News.  The only racism that exists in the USA is the reverse racism by the minorities taking over  American campuses and the left  supports them. The police should go in and restore order.

"Are these people out to address a wrong or flex their power over others?"

 

 

No excuse for the Mufti

Bolt prefers to attack the Mufti the Pope the Judicial system all from some vague  high moral high ground of his own choosing. That's his individualism there is no such thing as society, the community, or the group only Andrew Bolt and the very few who agree with him. It's what makes him a very ugly Australian who is never satisfied unless everyone does his bidding. That's a fascist mentality.

Paris for Bolt is the war against Islam not a war against home grown French extremists. The French certainly are treating it as such they aren't doing a Bolt what Bolt is hoping for. Australia is treating it as such and aren't doing a Bolt either.  Obama is pathetic. Bolt however is doing a great job in radicalizing himself and calling on others to become has hateful to Muslims here. He knows if he can encourage a backlash the Gray Zone will be reduced. Isn't that what Baghdadi is calling out for a backlash against Muslims and not just terrorists.  Destroy the infidels if they don't convert to Islam. Bolt is crying out destroy the Muslims if they don't become more like "me" and renounce their faith, reform it . Bolt believes he's the prophet.

"But, second, against the Left that preaches that we have nothing to defend, or little right to defend it."

Crying out I'm the victim here is Andrew Bolt. The spoilt brat in the school yard.

The chance we should give is not to the offender but his next victims

Bolt seems to believe the judicial system should be changed daily that it should no longer be systematic treating everyone equally. It should be flexible enough to meet the arbitrary whims of those in judgement of the circumstances. Sentencing by referendum instead of a judiciary would be prferable Sentencing by Bolt even more so. Isn't that the same as handing suspected criminals over to vigilantes?   Maybe it would be better we checked the weather first  before carrying out sentences by opinion. There needs to be some consistency in carrying out the law, hands up.

" Some women and children have paid a ghastly price for our legal system’s insistence on giving a known menace a second chance:"

Unfortunately equality under the law serves justice far better than making it up as you go. Systems are never perfect but they are more likely to be Just .